Drainage versus resection in chronic pancreatitis predominantly involving the head of the pancreas: A randomized study

Drainage and resection are the principles of surgery in chronic pancreatitis. The techniques of duodenum-preserving resection of the head of the pancreas as described by Beger and Frey combine both to different degrees. In a prospective randomized trial both procedures were compared: 74 patients were randomly allocated to either Beger's (n = 38) or Frey's (n = 36) group. In addition to routine pancreatic diagnostic work-up a multidimensional psychometric quality-of-life questionnaire and a pain score were used. Assessment of endocrine and exocrine function included oral glucose tolerance test, serum concentrations of insulin, C-peptide, and HbA(1c), as well as fecal chymotrypsin and pancreolauryl test. The mean interval between symptoms and surgery was 5.1 years (1-12 years). The median follow-up was 30 months. There was no mortality. Overall morbidity was 27 % (32 % Beger, 22 % Frey). Complications from adjacent organs were definitively resolved in 91 % (92 % Beger, 91 % Frey). A decrease in pain score of 95 % and 93 % after Beger's and Frey's procedure, respectively, and an increase of 67 % in the overall quality-of-life index in both groups were observed. Endocrine and exocrine function did not differ between the two groups. Both techniques of duodenum-preserving resection of the head of the pancreas are equally safe and effective with regard to pain relief, improvement of quality of life, and control of complications affecting adjacent organs. Neither procedure leads to further deterioration of endocrine and exocrine pancreatic function.