Use of electronic medical records differs by specialty and office settings

被引:51
作者
Kokkonen, Erik W. J. [1 ]
Davis, Scott A. [1 ]
Lin, Hsien-Chang [2 ]
Dabade, Tushar S. [1 ]
Feldman, Steven R. [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Fleischer, Alan B., Jr. [1 ]
机构
[1] Wake Forest Sch Med, Ctr Dermatol Res, Dept Dermatol, Winston Salem, NC 27157 USA
[2] Indiana Univ, Dept Appl Hlth Sci, Sch Publ Hlth, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA
[3] Wake Forest Sch Med, Ctr Dermatol Res, Dept Pathol, Winston Salem, NC 27157 USA
[4] Wake Forest Sch Med, Ctr Dermatol Res, Dept Publ Hlth Sci, Winston Salem, NC 27157 USA
关键词
HEALTH INFORMATION-TECHNOLOGY; AMBULATORY-CARE; PHYSICIANS; SYSTEMS; BENEFITS; ADOPTION; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001609
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Objective To assess differences in the use of electronic medical records (EMRs) among medical specialties and practice settings. Methods A cross-sectional retrospective study using nationally representative data from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey for the period 2003-2010 was performed. Bivariate and multivariate analyzes compared EMR use among physicians of 14 specialties and assessed variation by practice setting. Differences in EMR use by geographic region, patient characteristics, and physician office settings were also assessed. Results Bivariate and multivariate analysis demonstrated increased EMR use from 2003 to 2010, with 16% reporting at least partial use in 2003, rising to 52% in 2010 (p<0.001). Cardiologists, orthopedic surgeons, urologists, and family/general practitioners had higher frequencies of EMR use whereas psychiatrists, ophthalmologists, and dermatologists had the lowest EMR use. Employed physicians had higher EMR uptake than physicians who owned their practice (48% vs 31%, p<0.001). EMR uptake was lower among solo practitioners (23%) than non-solo practitioners (42%, p<0.001). Practices owned by Health Maintenance Organizations had higher frequencies of EMR use (83%) than practices owned by physicians, community health centers, or academic centers (all < 45%, p<0.001). Patient demographics did not affect EMR use (p>0.05). Conclusions Uptake of EMR is increasing, although it is significantly slower in dermatology, ophthalmology, and psychiatry. Solo practitioners and owners of a practice have low frequencies of EMR use compared with non-solo practitioners and those who do not own their practice. Despite incentives for EMR adoption, physicians should carefully weigh which, if any, EMR to adopt in their practices.
引用
收藏
页码:E33 / E38
页数:6
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] Audet Anne-Marie, 2004, MedGenMed, V6, P2
  • [2] Stimulating the Adoption of Health Information Technology.
    Blumenthal, David
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2009, 360 (15) : 1477 - 1479
  • [3] Bowens Felicia M, 2010, Perspect Health Inf Manag, V7, p1d
  • [4] The Benefits Of Health Information Technology: A Review Of The Recent Literature Shows Predominantly Positive Results
    Buntin, Melinda Beeuwkes
    Burke, Matthew F.
    Hoaglin, Michael C.
    Blumenthal, David
    [J]. HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2011, 30 (03) : 464 - 471
  • [5] Which physicians and practices are using electronic medical records?
    Burt, CW
    Sisk, JE
    [J]. HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2005, 24 (05) : 1334 - 1343
  • [6] A knowledge-based taxonomy of critical factors for adopting electronic health record systems by physicians: a systematic literature review
    Castillo, Victor H.
    Martinez-Garcia, Ana I.
    Pulido, J. R. G.
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING, 2010, 10
  • [7] Electronic health records in ambulatory care - A national survey of physicians
    DesRoches, Catherine M.
    Campbell, Eric G.
    Rao, Sowmya R.
    Donelan, Karen
    Ferris, Timothy G.
    Jha, Ashish
    Kaushal, Rainu
    Levy, Douglas E.
    Rosenbaum, Sara
    Shields, Alexandra E.
    Blumenthal, David
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2008, 359 (01) : 50 - 60
  • [8] DOLAN PL, 2011, AM MED NEWS 0620
  • [9] DOLAN PL, 2010, AM MED NEWS 1122
  • [10] Gadd CS, 2001, J AM MED INFORM ASSN, P194