Developmental Milestones Across the Programmatic Life Cycle Implementing the CDC's Colorectal Cancer Screening Demonstration Program

被引:8
|
作者
Glover-Kudon, Rebecca [1 ,2 ]
DeGroff, Amy [2 ]
Rohan, Elizabeth A. [2 ]
Preissle, Judith [3 ]
Boehm, Jennifer E. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Georgia, Univ Hlth Ctr, Athens, GA 30602 USA
[2] Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Div Canc Prevent & Control, Natl Ctr Chron Dis Prevent & Hlth Promot, Atlanta, GA 30341 USA
[3] Univ Georgia, Qualitat Res Program, Athens, GA 30602 USA
关键词
colorectal cancer screening; program implementation; program evaluation; program development; qualitative methods; multiple case study; technical assistance; HEALTH-PROGRAMS; UNITED-STATES; SUSTAINABILITY; PREVENTION;
D O I
10.1002/cncr.28166
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND In 2005 through 2009, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) funded 5 sites to implement a colorectal cancer screening program for uninsured, low-income populations. These 5 sites composed a demonstration project intended to explore the feasibility of establishing a national colorectal cancer screening program through various service delivery models. METHODS A longitudinal, multiple case study was conducted to understand and document program implementation processes. Using metaphor as a qualitative analytic technique, evaluators identified stages of maturation across the programmatic life cycle. RESULTS Analysis rendered a working theory of program development during screening implementation. In early stages, program staff built relationships with CDC and local partners around screening readiness, faced real-world challenges putting program policies into practice, revised initial program designs, and developed new professional skills. Midterm implementation was defined by establishing program cohesiveness and expanding programmatic reach. In later stages of implementation, staff focused on sustainability and formal program closeout, which prompted reflection about personal and programmatic accomplishments. CONCLUSIONS Demonstration sites evolved through common developmental stages during screening implementation. Findings elucidate ways to target technical assistance to more efficiently move programs along their maturation trajectory. In practical terms, the time and cost associated with guiding a program to maturity may be potentially shortened to maximize return on investment for both organizations and clients receiving service benefits. Cancer 2013;119(15 suppl):2926-39. (c) 2013 American Cancer Society. In a longitudinal qualitative evaluation of 5 sites that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention funded to provide colorectal cancer screening programs for uninsured, low-income populations, a developmental model was discovered to represent the programs' maturation over time. Demonstration sites evolved through common stages during screening implementation, suggesting key areas of technical assistance to more efficiently move programs along their maturation trajectory.
引用
收藏
页码:2926 / 2939
页数:14
相关论文
共 11 条
  • [1] Implementing the CDC's Colorectal Cancer Screening Demonstration Program: Wisdom from the field
    Rohan, Elizabeth A.
    Boehm, Jennifer E.
    DeGroff, Amy
    Glover-Kudon, Rebecca
    Preissle, Judith
    CANCER, 2013, 119 : 2870 - 2883
  • [2] Recruiting Patients into the CDC's Colorectal Cancer Screening Demonstration Program Strategies and Challenges Across 5 Sites
    Boehm, Jennifer E.
    Rohan, Elizabeth A.
    Preissle, Judith
    DeGroff, Amy
    Glover-Kudon, Rebecca
    CANCER, 2013, 119 : 2914 - 2925
  • [3] Lessons learned from the CDC's Colorectal Cancer Screening Demonstration Program
    Seeff, Laura C.
    Rohan, Elizabeth A.
    CANCER, 2013, 119 : 2817 - 2819
  • [4] Clinical outcomes from the CDC's Colorectal Cancer Screening Demonstration Program
    Seeff, Laura C.
    Royalty, Janet
    Helsel, William E.
    Kammerer, William G.
    Boehm, Jennifer E.
    Dwyer, Diane M.
    Howe, William R., Jr.
    Joseph, Djenaba
    Lane, Dorothy S.
    Laughlin, Melinda
    Leypoldt, Melissa
    Marroulis, Steven C.
    Mattingly, Cynthia A.
    Nadel, Marion R.
    Phillips-Angeles, Ellen
    Rockwell, Tanner J.
    Ryerson, A. Blythe
    Tangka, Florence K. L.
    CANCER, 2013, 119 : 2820 - 2833
  • [5] Costs of colorectal cancer screening provision in CDC's Colorectal Cancer Cohtrol Program: Comparisons of colonoscopy and FOBT/FIT based screening
    Subramanian, Sujha
    Tangka, Florence K. L.
    Hoover, Sonja
    Royalty, Janet
    DeGroff, Amy
    Joseph, Djenaba
    EVALUATION AND PROGRAM PLANNING, 2017, 62 : 73 - 80
  • [6] Clinical and programmatic costs of implementing colorectal cancer screening: Evaluation of five programs
    Subramanian, Sujha
    Tangka, Florence K. L.
    Hoover, Sonja
    DeGroff, Amy
    Royalty, Janet
    Seeff, Laura C.
    EVALUATION AND PROGRAM PLANNING, 2011, 34 (02) : 147 - 153
  • [7] Moving forward: Using the experience of the CDCs' Colorectal Cancer Screening Demonstration Program to guide future colorectal cancer programming efforts
    Seeff, Laura C.
    DeGroff, Amy
    Joseph, Djenaba A.
    Royalty, Janet
    Tangka, Florence K. L.
    Nadel, Marion R.
    Plescia, Marcus
    CANCER, 2013, 119 : 2940 - 2946
  • [8] Costs of promoting cancer screening: Evidence from CDC's Colorectal Cancer Control Prograrn (CRCCP)
    Tangka, Florence K. L.
    Subramanian, Sujha
    Hoover, Sonja
    Royalty, Janet
    Joseph, Kristy
    DeGroff, Amy
    Joseph, Djenaba
    Chattopadhyay, Sajal
    EVALUATION AND PROGRAM PLANNING, 2017, 62 : 67 - 72
  • [9] Identifying optimal approaches to scale up colorectal cancer screening: an overview of the centers for disease control and prevention (CDC)'s learning laboratory
    Tangka, Florence K. L.
    Subramanian, Sujha
    Hoover, Sonja
    Lara, Christen
    Eastman, Casey
    Glaze, Becky
    Conn, Mary Ellen
    DeGroff, Amy
    Wong, Faye L.
    Richardson, Lisa C.
    CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL, 2019, 30 (02) : 169 - 175
  • [10] Identifying optimal approaches to scale up colorectal cancer screening: an overview of the centers for disease control and prevention (CDC)’s learning laboratory
    Florence K. L. Tangka
    Sujha Subramanian
    Sonja Hoover
    Christen Lara
    Casey Eastman
    Becky Glaze
    Mary Ellen Conn
    Amy DeGroff
    Faye L. Wong
    Lisa C. Richardson
    Cancer Causes & Control, 2019, 30 : 169 - 175