Does renewable energy policy work? Evidence from a panel data analysis

被引:137
作者
Liu, Wenfeng [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Xingping [1 ,3 ]
Feng, Sida [1 ]
机构
[1] North China Elect Power Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing 102206, Peoples R China
[2] North China Elect Power Univ, Beijing Key Lab New Energy & Low Carbon Dev, Beijing 102206, Peoples R China
[3] Res Ctr Beijing Energy Dev, Beijing 102206, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家社会科学基金;
关键词
Renewable energy policy; Policy effect assessment; Panel data model; WIND POWER;
D O I
10.1016/j.renene.2018.12.037
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper develops a fixed effect model to evaluate the effect of renewable energy policy using a panel dataset covering 29 countries during the period of 2000-2015. The renewable energy policy system in this paper includes seven aggregate policies and twelve specific ones. The empirical results indicate that four of seven aggregate policies, including fiscal and financial incentives, market-based instruments, policy support, and research, development and deployment, are demonstrated to be significant to the improvement of renewable energy capacity. Meanwhile, three of twelve specific policies, including price policy, grants and subsidies, and strategic planning, have positive effects on renewable energy development. This paper assesses the aggregate and specific policies in the same analysis framework, and the empirical results determined that synergy effects existed among specific policies. The empirical results also indicate that the implementation of the Kyoto Protocol in 2005 has had positive impacts on renewable energy development in typical countries. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:635 / 642
页数:8
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   Determinants of renewable energy growth: A global sample analysis [J].
Aguirre, Mariana ;
Ibikunle, Gbenga .
ENERGY POLICY, 2014, 69 :374-384
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2017, BP STAT REV WORLD EN
[3]   Impact of public policy uncertainty on renewable energy investment: Wind power and the production tax credit [J].
Barradale, Merrill Jones .
ENERGY POLICY, 2010, 38 (12) :7698-7709
[4]   Policies and market factors driving wind power development in the United States [J].
Bird, L ;
Bolinger, M ;
Gagliano, T ;
Wiser, R ;
Brown, M ;
Parsons, B .
ENERGY POLICY, 2005, 33 (11) :1397-1407
[5]   State renewable energy electricity policies: An empirical evaluation of effectiveness [J].
Carley, Sanya .
ENERGY POLICY, 2009, 37 (08) :3071-3081
[6]  
de Jager D., 2011, FINANCING RENEWABLE, DOI [10.13140/2.1.3115.2645, DOI 10.13140/2.1.3115.2645]
[7]  
DeJager D., 2008, POLICY INSTRUMENT DE, P142
[8]   Comparing the innovation effects of support schemes for renewable electricity technologies: A function of innovation approach [J].
del Rio, Pablo ;
Bleda, Mercedes .
ENERGY POLICY, 2012, 50 :272-282
[9]   US state policies for renewable energy: Context and effectiveness [J].
Delmas, Magali A. ;
Montes-Sancho, Maria J. .
ENERGY POLICY, 2011, 39 (05) :2273-2288
[10]   Feed-in tariff vs. renewable portfolio standard: An empirical test of their relative effectiveness in promoting wind capacity development [J].
Dong, C. G. .
ENERGY POLICY, 2012, 42 :476-485