Organic chemistry students' fragmented ideas about the structure and function of nucleophiles and electrophiles: a concept map analysis

被引:59
作者
Anzovino, Mary E. [1 ]
Bretz, Stacey Lowery [1 ]
机构
[1] Miami Univ, Dept Chem & Biochem, Oxford, OH 45056 USA
关键词
GENERAL-CHEMISTRY; PUSHING FORMALISM; REPRESENTATIONS; CLASSIFICATION; PERFORMANCE; MECHANISMS; THINKING; EXPERT; TOOL;
D O I
10.1039/c6rp00111d
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Organic chemistry students struggle with multiple aspects of reaction mechanisms and the curved arrow notation used by organic chemists. Many faculty believe that an understanding of nucleophiles and electrophiles, among other concepts, is required before students can develop fluency with the electronpushing formalism (EPF). An expert concept map was created to depict an understanding of nucleophiles and electrophiles ideally held by undergraduates. Second year organic chemistry students were interviewed and asked to give examples of nucleophiles and electrophiles and to identify them in reactions. A cognitive map was created to represent each student's understanding. The students' maps were compared to the expert map, revealing that students possess fragmented ideas about the structure and function of nucleophiles and electrophiles.
引用
收藏
页码:1019 / 1029
页数:11
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   An epistemological inquiry into organic chemistry education: exploration of undergraduate students' conceptual understanding of functional groups [J].
Akkuzu, Nalan ;
Uyulgan, Melis Arzu .
CHEMISTRY EDUCATION RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2016, 17 (01) :36-57
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2014, NVIVO QUAL DAT AN SO
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2006, THEORY UNDERLYING CO
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2002, Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2010, LEARNING CREATING US
[6]   Organic chemistry students' ideas about nucleophiles and electrophiles: the role of charges and mechanisms [J].
Anzovino, Mary E. ;
Bretz, Stacey Lowery .
CHEMISTRY EDUCATION RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2015, 16 (04) :797-810
[7]   IN DEFENSE OF VERBAL-LEARNING [J].
AUSUBEL, DP .
EDUCATIONAL THEORY, 1961, 11 (01) :15-25
[8]   It gets me to the product: How students propose organic mechanisms [J].
Bhattacharyya, G ;
Bodner, GM .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL EDUCATION, 2005, 82 (09) :1402-1407
[9]   From Source to Sink: Mechanistic Reasoning Using the Electron-Pushing Formalism [J].
Bhattacharyya, Gautam .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL EDUCATION, 2013, 90 (10) :1282-1289
[10]  
Bretz S. L., 2001, J CHEM EDUC, V78, P1107, DOI DOI 10.1021/ED078P1107.6