Breast Lesions: Diagnosis by Using Proton MR Spectroscopy at 1.5 and 3.0 T-Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:95
作者
Baltzer, Pascal A. T. [1 ]
Dietzel, Matthias [2 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ Vienna, Dept Radiol, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
[2] Univ Hosp Erlangen, Dept Neuroradiol, Erlangen, Germany
关键词
MAGNETIC-RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; POSITIVE PREDICTIVE-VALUE; VIVO H-1 MRS; PUBLICATION BIAS; CHOLINE PEAK; FAT RATIO; CANCER; MALIGNANCY; BENIGN; TUMORS;
D O I
10.1148/radiol.13121856
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate the diagnostic performance of breast proton magnetic resonance (MR) spectroscopy in differentiating benign from malignant lesions and to identify variables that influence the accuracy of MR spectroscopy. Materials and Methods: A comprehensive search of the PubMed database was performed on articles listed until January 6, 2012. The Medical Subject Headings and text words for the terms "breast," "spectroscopy," and " magnetic resonance" were used. Investigations including more than 10 patients at 1.5 T or 3.0 T applying one-dimensional single-voxel MR spectroscopy or spatially resolved MR spectroscopy for differentiation between benign and malignant breast lesions were eligible. A reference standard had to be established either by means of histopathologic examination or imaging follow-up of 12 or more months. Statistical analysis included pooling of diagnostic accuracy, control for data inhomogeneity, and identification of publication bias. Results: Nineteen studies were used for general data pooling. The studies included a total of 1183 patients and 1198 lesions (773 malignant, 452 benign). Pooled sensitivity and specificity were 73% (556 of 761; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 64%, 82%) and 88% (386 of 439; 95% CI: 85%, 91%), respectively. The pooled diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) was 34.30 (95% CI: 16.71, 70.43). For breast cancers versus benign lesions, the area under the symmetric summary receiver operating characteristic curve of MR spectroscopy was 0.88, and the Q* index was 0.81. There was evidence of between-studies heterogeneity regarding sensitivity and DOR (P < .0001). No significant influences of higher field strength, postcontrast acquisition, or qualitative versus quantitative MR spectroscopy measurements were identified. Egger testing confirmed significant publication bias in studies including small numbers of patients (P < .0001). Conclusion: Breast MR spectroscopy shows variable sensitivity and high specificity in the diagnosis of breast lesions, independent from the technical MR spectroscopy approach. Because of significant publication bias, pooled diagnostic measures might be overestimated. (c) RSNA, 2013
引用
收藏
页码:735 / 746
页数:12
相关论文
共 49 条
[41]   Diagnostic architectural and dynamic features at breast MR imaging:: Multicenter study [J].
Schnall, MD ;
Blume, J ;
Bluemke, DA ;
DeAngelis, GA ;
DeBruhl, N ;
Harms, S ;
Heywang-Köbrunner, SH ;
Hylton, N ;
Kuhl, CK ;
Pisano, ED ;
Causer, P ;
Schnitt, SJ ;
Thickman, D ;
Stelling, CB ;
Weatherall, PT ;
Lehman, C ;
Gatsonis, CA .
RADIOLOGY, 2006, 238 (01) :42-53
[42]   Study of normal breast tissue by in vivo volume localized proton MR Spectroscopy: variation of Water-Fat ratio in relation to the heterogeneity of the breast and the menstrual cycle [J].
Sharma, Uma ;
Kumar, Mahesh ;
Sah, Rani G. ;
Jagannathan, Naranamangalam R. .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2009, 27 (06) :785-791
[43]   Diagnostic Usefulness of Water-to-Fat Ratio and Choline Concentration in Malignant and Benign Breast Lesions and Normal Breast Parenchyma: An In Vivo 1H MRS Study [J].
Thakur, Sunitha B. ;
Brennan, Sandra B. ;
Ishill, Nicole M. ;
Morris, Elizabeth A. ;
Liberman, Laura ;
Dershaw, D. David ;
Bartella, Lia ;
Koutcher, Jason A. ;
Huang, Wei .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2011, 33 (04) :855-863
[44]   1H MR Spectroscopy and Diffusion-Weighted Imaging of the Breast: Are They Useful Tools for Characterizing Breast Lesions Before Biopsy? [J].
Tozaki, Mitsuhiro ;
Fukuma, Eisuke .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2009, 193 (03) :840-849
[45]   Characterization of lesions of the breast with proton MR spectroscopy: Comparison of carcinomas, benign lesions, and phyllodes tumors [J].
Tse, GMK ;
Cheung, HS ;
Pang, LM ;
Chu, WCW ;
Law, BKB ;
Kung, FYL ;
Yeung, DKW .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2003, 181 (05) :1267-1272
[46]   Systematic review: Using magnetic resonance imaging to screen women at high risk for breast cancer [J].
Warner, Ellen ;
Messersmith, Hans ;
Causer, Petrina ;
Eisen, Andrea ;
Shumak, Rene ;
Plewes, Donald .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2008, 148 (09) :671-679
[47]   The development of QUADAS: A tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews [J].
Penny Whiting ;
Anne WS Rutjes ;
Johannes B Reitsma ;
Patrick MM Bossuyt ;
Jos Kleijnen .
BMC Medical Research Methodology, 3 (1) :1-13
[48]   Human breast lesions: Characterization with contrast-enhanced in vivo proton MR spectroscopy - Initial results [J].
Yeung, DKW ;
Cheung, HS ;
Tse, GMK .
RADIOLOGY, 2001, 220 (01) :40-46
[49]   Meta-DiSc: A software for meta-analysis of test accuracy data [J].
Zamora J. ;
Abraira V. ;
Muriel A. ;
Khan K. ;
Coomarasamy A. .
BMC Medical Research Methodology, 6 (1)