Randomized Controlled Trial of Polyethylene Glycol versus Oral Sodium Phosphate for Bowel Preparation in Unsedated Colonoscopy

被引:7
作者
Yang, Dong [1 ]
Tao, Ke [1 ]
Chen, Geng [1 ]
Zhang, Luping [1 ]
He, Qingying [1 ]
Xu, Hong [1 ]
机构
[1] First Hosp Jilin Univ, Dept Gastroenterol, 1 Xinmin St, Changchun 130021, Peoples R China
关键词
CARBON-DIOXIDE INSUFFLATION; QUALITY INDICATORS; METAANALYSIS; INSERTION; EFFICACY; TABLETS;
D O I
10.1155/2020/6457079
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Aim. To identify the most effective laxative for bowel preparation in unsedated colonoscopy.Methods. Between April 2019 and April 2020, a total of 586 outpatients scheduled for unsedated colonoscopy at the First Hospital of Jilin University (Changchun, China) were randomized into one of two groups, namely, the polyethylene glycol (PEG) group or the oral sodium phosphate solution (OSP) group. The cleaning efficiency and other relevant clinical parameters were compared between the two groups.Results.Each group consisted of 293 patients. There were no significant differences in gender, body mass index, and history of abdominal surgery between the two groups. There were more cases of laxative intolerance in the PEG group than in the OSP group (7.5% vs. 0.7%,P<0.05). After tube insertion, we found that the cleaning efficiency of OSP was better than that of PEG (P<0.05). After cleaning, there was no significant difference in bowel cleanliness between the two groups (P>0.05). The colonoscopic insertion time of the PEG group was significantly shorter than that of the OSP group (10.0 vs. 12.0 min,P=0.002), and colonoscopic insertion was more difficult in the OSP group than in the PEG group (P=0.036). The VAS score of the PEG group patients was significantly lower than that of OSP group patients (4.0 +/- 1.3vs.5.2 +/- 1.7,P <= 0.001). There were no significant differences in the cecal intubation rate and the detection rate of polyps and ulcers/erosion between the two groups.Conclusion.The cleaning efficiency and tolerability of OSP were preferable to those of PEG, but there was no significant difference in bowel cleanliness after washing the colon and suctioning the fluid. Compared with patients of the OSP group, those of the PEG group required a shorter colonoscopic insertion time and reported a more comfortable experience. Therefore, for cases that are tolerant of PEG, PEG is a better choice for unsedated colonoscopy.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   Meta-analysis: the relative efficacy of oral bowel preparations for colonoscopy 1985-2010 [J].
Belsey, J. ;
Crosta, C. ;
Epstein, O. ;
Fischbach, W. ;
Layer, P. ;
Parente, F. ;
Halphen, M. .
ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2012, 35 (02) :222-237
[2]   Association Between Oral Sodium Phosphate Bowel Preparations and Kidney Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis [J].
Brunelli, Steven M. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 2009, 53 (03) :448-456
[3]   Modifiable factors associated with patient-reported pain during and after screening colonoscopy [J].
Bugajski, Marek ;
Wieszczy, Paulina ;
Hoff, Geir ;
Rupinski, Maciej ;
Regula, Jaroslaw ;
Kaminski, Michal Filip .
GUT, 2018, 67 (11) :1958-1964
[4]   Phosphate tablets or polyethylene glycol for preparation to colonoscopy? A multicentre non-inferiority randomized controlled trial [J].
Chaussade, Stanislas ;
Schmoecker, Christoph ;
Toulemonde, Pierre ;
Munoz-Navas, Miguel ;
O'Mahony, Valerie ;
Henri, Franck .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2017, 31 (05) :2166-2173
[5]   Carbon dioxide insufflation does not reduce pain scores during colonoscope insertion in unsedated patients: a randomized, controlled trial [J].
Chen, Peng-Jen ;
Li, Chung-Hsien ;
Huang, Tien-Yu ;
Shih, Yu-Lueng ;
Chu, Heng-Cheng ;
Chang, Wei-Kuo ;
Hsieh, Tsai-Yuan .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2013, 77 (01) :79-89
[6]   Quantification of Adequate Bowel Preparation for Screening or Surveillance Colonoscopy in Men [J].
Clark, Brian T. ;
Protiva, Petr ;
Nagar, Anil ;
Imaeda, Avlin ;
Ciarleglio, Maria M. ;
Deng, Yanhong ;
Laine, Loren .
GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2016, 150 (02) :396-405
[7]   What Level of Bowel Prep Quality Requires Early Repeat Colonoscopy: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Impact of Preparation Quality on Adenoma Detection Rate [J].
Clark, Brian T. ;
Rustagi, Tarun ;
Laine, Loren .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2014, 109 (11) :1714-1723
[8]   Randomized controlled trial comparing Moviprep® and Phosphoral® as bowel cleansing agents in patients undergoing colonoscopy [J].
Haas, S. ;
Andersen, L. M. ;
Sommer, T. .
TECHNIQUES IN COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2014, 18 (10) :929-935
[9]   Bowel preparation for colonoscopy: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline - Update 2019 [J].
Hassan, Cesare ;
East, James ;
Radaelli, Franco ;
Spada, Cristiano ;
Benamouzig, Robert ;
Bisschops, Raf ;
Bretthauer, Michael ;
Dekker, E. ;
Dinis-Ribeiro, Mario ;
Ferlitsch, Monika ;
Fuccio, Lorenzo ;
Awadie, Halim ;
Gralnek, Ian ;
Jover, Rodrigo ;
Kaminski, Michal F. ;
Pellise, Maria ;
Triantafyllou, Konstantinos ;
Vanella, Giuseppe ;
Mangas-Sanjuan, Carolina ;
Frazzoni, Leonardo ;
Van Hooft, Jeanin E. ;
Dumonceau, Jean-Marc .
ENDOSCOPY, 2019, 51 (08) :775-794
[10]   Bowel preparations as quality indicators for colonoscopy [J].
Jang, Jae Young ;
Chun, Hoon Jai .
WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2014, 20 (11) :2746-2750