Efficacy and tolerability of vortioxetine versus agomelatine, categorized by previous treatment, in patients with major depressive disorder switched after an inadequate response

被引:16
作者
Papakostas, George, I [1 ]
Nielsen, Rebecca Z. [2 ]
Dragheim, Marianne [2 ]
Tonnoir, Brigitte [2 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Med Sch, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[2] H Lundbeck & Co AS, Ottiliavej 9, DK-2500 Copenhagen, Denmark
关键词
Agomelatine; Inadequate response; Major depressive disorder; Switch; Vortioxetine; STAR-ASTERISK-D; ANTIDEPRESSANT; NONRESPONSE; UPDATE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jpsychires.2018.02.017
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
This study aimed to evaluate if efficacy and tolerability of switching to vortioxetine is independent of previous SSRI or SNRI treatment in patients who had been inadequately treated for their current major depressive episode. Patients from a double-blind, 12-week comparator study were randomized (1:1) to vortioxetine (10-20 mg/day) or agomelatine (25-50 mg/day). The pre-defined primary efficacy endpoint was change from baseline to week 8 in MADRS total score analyzed by MMRM. An ANCOVA-LOCF was conducted as a sensitivity analysis. These analyses were repeated in subgroups according to previous antidepressant treatment. In the overall population, vortioxetine (n = 252) was significantly superior to agomelatine (n = 241) by -2.2 MADRS points (p < 0.01) at week 8. similar to 77% (n = 189/vortioxetine, n = 188/agomelatine) were previously treated with an SSRI (citalopram, escitalopram, paroxetine, sertraline) and similar to 23% (n = 62/vortioxetine, n = 52/agomelatine) with an SNRI (duloxetine, venlafaxine). Baseline characteristics were similar in all subgroups. Treatment differences (MMRM) in MADRS total score were - 2.6 and - 2.3 (n = 164/vortioxetine, n = 150/agomelatine) (p < 0.01) for patients switching from an SSRI and -1.8 and -1.5 (n = 56/vortioxetine, n = 40/agomelatine) (p > 0.05) from an SNRI at weeks 8 and 12, respectively; non-significant improvements were seen for each of the 6 previous antidepressants. Improvements in HAM-A, CGI-I, and EQ-5D scales were significant for the SSRI subgroup and non-significant for the SNRI subgroup. Withdrawal and adverse event rates were similar, regardless of previous SSRI or SNRI treatment. These subgroup analyses showed statistical superiority of vortioxetine to agomelatine in inadequate responders to SSRIs and statistically non-significant improvements in the smaller SNRI subgroup, while being equally well tolerated.
引用
收藏
页码:72 / 79
页数:8
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [21] STAR*D: What have we learned?
    Rush, A. John
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2007, 164 (02) : 201 - 204
  • [22] Acute and longer-term outcomes in depressed outpatients requiring one or several treatment steps: A STAR*D report
    Rush, A. John
    Trivedi, Madhukar H.
    Wisniewski, Stephen R.
    Nierenberg, Andrew A.
    Stewart, Jonathan W.
    Warden, Diane
    Niederehe, George
    Thase, Michael E.
    Lavori, Philip W.
    Lebowitz, Barry D.
    McGrath, Patrick J.
    Rosenbaum, Jerrold F.
    Sackeim, Harold A.
    Kupfer, David J.
    Luther, James
    Fava, Maurizio
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2006, 163 (11) : 1905 - 1917
  • [23] Bupropion-SR, sertraline, or venlafaxine-XR after failure of SSRIs for depression
    Rush, AJ
    Trivedi, MH
    Wisniewski, SR
    Stewart, JW
    Nierenberg, AA
    Thase, ME
    Ritz, L
    Biggs, MM
    Warden, D
    Luther, JF
    Shores-Wilson, K
    Niederehe, G
    Fava, M
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2006, 354 (12) : 1231 - 1242
  • [24] Vortioxetine, a novel antidepressant with multimodal activity: Review of preclinical and clinical data
    Sanchez, Connie
    Asin, Karen E.
    Artigas, Francesc
    [J]. PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2015, 145 : 43 - 57
  • [25] Santaguida P., 2012, Treatment for depression after unsatisfactory response to SSRIs
  • [26] Transgenic elimination of high-affinity antidepressant and cocaine sensitivity in the presynaptic serotonin transporter
    Thompson, Brent J.
    Jessen, Tammy
    Henry, L. K.
    Field, Julie R.
    Gamble, Karen L.
    Gresch, Paul J.
    Carneiro, Ana M.
    Horton, Rebecca E.
    Chisnell, Peter J.
    Belova, Yekaterina
    McMahon, Douglas G.
    Daws, Lynette C.
    Blakely, Randy D.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2011, 108 (09) : 3785 - 3790