Efficacy and tolerability of vortioxetine versus agomelatine, categorized by previous treatment, in patients with major depressive disorder switched after an inadequate response

被引:16
作者
Papakostas, George, I [1 ]
Nielsen, Rebecca Z. [2 ]
Dragheim, Marianne [2 ]
Tonnoir, Brigitte [2 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Med Sch, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[2] H Lundbeck & Co AS, Ottiliavej 9, DK-2500 Copenhagen, Denmark
关键词
Agomelatine; Inadequate response; Major depressive disorder; Switch; Vortioxetine; STAR-ASTERISK-D; ANTIDEPRESSANT; NONRESPONSE; UPDATE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jpsychires.2018.02.017
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
This study aimed to evaluate if efficacy and tolerability of switching to vortioxetine is independent of previous SSRI or SNRI treatment in patients who had been inadequately treated for their current major depressive episode. Patients from a double-blind, 12-week comparator study were randomized (1:1) to vortioxetine (10-20 mg/day) or agomelatine (25-50 mg/day). The pre-defined primary efficacy endpoint was change from baseline to week 8 in MADRS total score analyzed by MMRM. An ANCOVA-LOCF was conducted as a sensitivity analysis. These analyses were repeated in subgroups according to previous antidepressant treatment. In the overall population, vortioxetine (n = 252) was significantly superior to agomelatine (n = 241) by -2.2 MADRS points (p < 0.01) at week 8. similar to 77% (n = 189/vortioxetine, n = 188/agomelatine) were previously treated with an SSRI (citalopram, escitalopram, paroxetine, sertraline) and similar to 23% (n = 62/vortioxetine, n = 52/agomelatine) with an SNRI (duloxetine, venlafaxine). Baseline characteristics were similar in all subgroups. Treatment differences (MMRM) in MADRS total score were - 2.6 and - 2.3 (n = 164/vortioxetine, n = 150/agomelatine) (p < 0.01) for patients switching from an SSRI and -1.8 and -1.5 (n = 56/vortioxetine, n = 40/agomelatine) (p > 0.05) from an SNRI at weeks 8 and 12, respectively; non-significant improvements were seen for each of the 6 previous antidepressants. Improvements in HAM-A, CGI-I, and EQ-5D scales were significant for the SSRI subgroup and non-significant for the SNRI subgroup. Withdrawal and adverse event rates were similar, regardless of previous SSRI or SNRI treatment. These subgroup analyses showed statistical superiority of vortioxetine to agomelatine in inadequate responders to SSRIs and statistically non-significant improvements in the smaller SNRI subgroup, while being equally well tolerated.
引用
收藏
页码:72 / 79
页数:8
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2012, TREATM DEPR UNS RESP
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1996, ICH HARMONISED TRIPA
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2014, EPAR BRINTELLIX PROD
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2009, DEPR TREATM MAN DEPR
  • [5] Discovery of 1-[2-(2,4-Dimethylphenylsulfanyl)phenyl]piperazine (Lu AA21004): A Novel Multimodal Compound for the Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder
    Bang-Andersen, Benny
    Ruhland, Thomas
    Jorgensen, Morten
    Smith, Garrick
    Frederiksen, Kristen
    Jensen, Klaus Gjervig
    Zhong, Huailing
    Nielsen, Soren Moller
    Hogg, Sandra
    Mork, Arne
    Stensbol, Tine Bryan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 2011, 54 (09) : 3206 - 3221
  • [6] World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP) Guidelines for Biological Treatment of Unipolar Depressive Disorders, Part 1: Update 2013 on the acute and continuation treatment of unipolar depressive disorders
    Bauer, Michael
    Pfennig, Andrea
    Severus, Emanuel
    Whybrow, Peter C.
    Angst, Jules
    Moeller, Hans-Juergen
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2013, 14 (05) : 334 - 385
  • [7] Vortioxetine in the treatment of adult patients with major depressive disorder: a meta-analysis of randomized double-blind controlled trials
    Berhan, Asres
    Barker, Alex
    [J]. BMC PSYCHIATRY, 2014, 14
  • [8] Efficacy and tolerability of switching therapy to vortioxetine versus other antidepressants in patients with major depressive disorder
    Brignone, Melanie
    Diamand, Francoise
    Painchault, Caroline
    Takyar, Shweta
    [J]. CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2016, 32 (02) : 351 - 366
  • [9] Davidson Jonathan R T, 2010, J Clin Psychiatry, V71 Suppl E1, pe04, DOI 10.4088/JCP.9058se1c.04gry
  • [10] FDA (US Food and Drug Administration), 2013, BRINT VORT TABL OR U