Comparison of health service accreditation programs in low- and middle-income countries with those in higher income countries: a cross-sectional study

被引:43
作者
Braithwaite, Jeffrey [1 ]
Shaw, Charles D.
Moldovan, Max
Greenfield, David
Hinchcliff, Reece
Mumford, Virginia
Kristensen, Marie Brunn
Westbrook, Johanna
Nicklin, Wendy [2 ]
Fortune, Triona [3 ]
Whittaker, Stuart [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ New S Wales, Australian Inst Hlth Innovat, Ctr Clin Governance Res, Fac Med, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
[2] Accreditat Canada, Ottawa, ON K1J 7S9, Canada
[3] Int Soc Qual Hlth Care, Dublin 2, Ireland
[4] Council Hlth Serv Accreditat So Africa, ZA-7450 Cape Town, South Africa
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
low- and middle-income countries; higher income countries; accreditation; healthcare standards; political circumstances; HOSPITAL ACCREDITATION; QUALITY MANAGEMENT; PATIENT SAFETY; PERFORMANCE; CULTURE;
D O I
10.1093/intqhc/mzs064
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective. The study aim was twofold: to investigate and describe the organizational attributes of accreditation programmes in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) to determine how or to what extent these differ from those in higher-income countries (HICs) and to identify contextual factors that sustain or are barriers to their survival. Design. Web-based questionnaire survey. Participants. National healthcare accreditation providers and those offering international services. In total, 44 accreditation agencies completed the survey. Main outcome measure(s). Income distinctions, accreditation programme features, organizational attributes and cross-national divergence. Results. Accreditation programmes of LMICs exhibit similar characteristics to those of HICs. The consistent model of accreditation worldwide, centres on promoting improvements, applying standards and providing feedback. Where they do differ, the divergence is over specialized features rather than the general logic. LMICs were less likely than HICs to include an evaluation component to programmes, more likely to have certification processes for trainee surveyors and more likely to make decisions on the accreditation status based on a formulaic, mathematically oriented approach. Accreditation programme sustainability, irrespective of country characteristics, is influenced by ongoing policy support from government, a sufficient large healthcare market size, stable programme funding, diverse incentives to encourage participation in accreditation by Health Care Organizations as well as the continual refinement and improvement in accreditation agency operations and programme delivery. Conclusions. Understanding the similarities, differences and factors that sustain accreditation programmes in LMICs, and HICs, can be applied to benefit programmes around the world. A flourishing accreditation programme is one element of the institutional basis for high-quality health care.
引用
收藏
页码:568 / 577
页数:10
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   Evaluation of accreditation program in non-governmental organizations' health units in Egypt: short-term outcomes [J].
Al Tehewy, Mahi ;
Salem, Bssiouni ;
Habil, Ihab ;
El Okda, Sayed .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 2009, 21 (03) :183-189
[2]   Assessment of the accreditation standards of the Central Board for Accreditation of Healthcare Institutions in Saudi Arabia against the principles of the International Society for Quality in Health Care (ISQua) [J].
AlKhenizan, Abdullah ;
Shaw, Charles .
ANNALS OF SAUDI MEDICINE, 2010, 30 (05) :386-389
[3]  
[Anonymous], INT J QUALITY HLTH C
[4]  
[Anonymous], INT J QUALITY UNPUB
[5]  
[Anonymous], INT J QUAL HLTH CARE
[6]  
[Anonymous], J MED SCI
[7]  
[Anonymous], QUAL ACCR HLTH SERV
[8]  
[Anonymous], CONTINUOUS QUALITY I
[9]  
[Anonymous], RJMS
[10]  
[Anonymous], ACREDITACAO