Human contrast-detail performance with declining contrast

被引:1
|
作者
Walz-Flannigan, Alisa [2 ]
Babcock, Ben [3 ]
Kagadis, George C. [1 ]
Wang, Jihong [4 ]
Langer, Steve G. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Patras, Sch Med, Dept Med Phys, GR-26504 Rion, Greece
[2] Mayo Clin, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[3] Amer Registry Radiol Technologists, Mendota Hts, MN 55120 USA
[4] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
ambient lighting; contrast/detail performance; observer studies; display; GSDF; luminance; human visual system; DIGITAL CHEST RADIOGRAPHS; MONITOR LUMINANCE CHANGE; OBSERVER PERFORMANCE; DISPLAY SYSTEMS; AMBIENT LIGHT; SENSITIVITY; ILLUMINATION; RESOLUTION;
D O I
10.1118/1.4742851
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: How do display settings and ambient lighting affect contrast detection thresholds for human observers? Can recalibrating a display for high ambient lighting improve object detection? Methods: Contrast/detail (CD) threshold detection performance was measured for observers using four color displays with varying overall contrast (e.g., differing maximum luminance and ambient lighting conditions). Detailed mapping of contrast detection performance (for fixed object size) was tracked as a function of: display maximum luminance, ambient lighting changes (with and without recalibrating for the higher ambience), and the performance of radiologists vs. nonradiologists. Results: The initial phase was analyzed with a hierarchical linear model of observer performance using: background gray level, maximum display luminance, and radiologist vs. nonradiologist. The only statistically significant finding was a maximum luminance of 100 cd/m(2) display performing worse than a baseline peak of 400 cd/m(2). The second phase examined ambient lighting effects on detection thresholds. Background gray level and maximum display luminance were examined coupled with ambient lighting for: baseline at 30, 435 uncorrected, and 435 lx with display recalibration for the ambient conditions. Results showed ambient correction improved sensitivity for small background digital driving level, but not at higher luminance backgrounds. Conclusions: For CD study, nonradiologist observers can be used without loss of applicability. Contrast detection thresholds improved significantly between displays with peak luminance from 100 cd/m(2) to 200 cd/m(2), but improvement beyond that was not statistically significant for contrast detection thresholds in a reading room environment. Applying a calibration correction at high ambience (435 lx) improved detection tasks primarily in the darker background regions. (c) 2012 American Association of Physicists in Medicine. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.4742851]
引用
收藏
页码:5446 / 5456
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The Performance of Sensitivity-Maps Method in Reconstructing Low Contrast and Multi-Contrast Objects for Microwave Imaging Applications
    Basari, Syahrul
    Ramdani, Syahrul
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ONLINE AND BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2023, 19 (08) : 175 - 193
  • [32] Contrast Sensitivity of ON and OFF Human Retinal Pathways in Myopia
    Poudel, Sabina
    Jin, Jianzhong
    Rahimi-Nasrabadi, Hamed
    Dellostritto, Stephen
    Dul, Mitchell W.
    Viswanathan, Suresh
    Alonso, Jose-Manuel
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2024, 44 (03)
  • [33] Comparison of low-contrast detail perception on storage phosphor radiographs and digital flat panel detector images
    Peer, S
    Neitzel, U
    Giacomuzzi, SM
    Peer, R
    Gassner, E
    Steingruber, I
    Jaschke, W
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 2001, 20 (03) : 239 - 242
  • [34] Effects of Resolution, Range, and Image Contrast on Target Acquisition Performance
    Hollands, Justin G.
    Terhaar, Phil
    Pavlovic, Nada J.
    HUMAN FACTORS, 2018, 60 (03) : 363 - 383
  • [35] Contrast sensitivity and visual acuity in animals
    Harmening, W. M.
    OPHTHALMOLOGE, 2017, 114 (11): : 986 - 996
  • [36] Differential changes in perceived contrast following contrast adaptation in humans
    Hietanen, M. A.
    Cloherty, S. L.
    Clifford, C. W. G.
    Ibbotson, M. R.
    VISION RESEARCH, 2010, 50 (01) : 12 - 19
  • [37] Contrast discrimination in images of natural scenes
    Jarvis, John
    Triantaphillidou, Sophie
    Gupta, Gaurav
    JOURNAL OF THE OPTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA A-OPTICS IMAGE SCIENCE AND VISION, 2022, 39 (06) : B50 - B64
  • [38] Endogenous attention enhances contrast appearance regardless of stimulus contrast
    Luo, Zi-Xi
    Pan, Wang-Nan
    Zeng, Xiang-Jun
    Gong, Liang-Yu
    Cai, Yong-Chun
    ATTENTION PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2024, 86 (06) : 1883 - 1896
  • [39] Measuring resolution in the contrast domain: The small letter contrast test
    Rabin, J
    Wicks, J
    OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE, 1996, 73 (06) : 398 - 403
  • [40] A neurophysiologically plausible population code model for human contrast discrimination
    Goris, Robbe L. T.
    Wichmann, Felix A.
    Henning, G. Bruce
    JOURNAL OF VISION, 2009, 9 (07):