Human contrast-detail performance with declining contrast

被引:1
|
作者
Walz-Flannigan, Alisa [2 ]
Babcock, Ben [3 ]
Kagadis, George C. [1 ]
Wang, Jihong [4 ]
Langer, Steve G. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Patras, Sch Med, Dept Med Phys, GR-26504 Rion, Greece
[2] Mayo Clin, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[3] Amer Registry Radiol Technologists, Mendota Hts, MN 55120 USA
[4] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
ambient lighting; contrast/detail performance; observer studies; display; GSDF; luminance; human visual system; DIGITAL CHEST RADIOGRAPHS; MONITOR LUMINANCE CHANGE; OBSERVER PERFORMANCE; DISPLAY SYSTEMS; AMBIENT LIGHT; SENSITIVITY; ILLUMINATION; RESOLUTION;
D O I
10.1118/1.4742851
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: How do display settings and ambient lighting affect contrast detection thresholds for human observers? Can recalibrating a display for high ambient lighting improve object detection? Methods: Contrast/detail (CD) threshold detection performance was measured for observers using four color displays with varying overall contrast (e.g., differing maximum luminance and ambient lighting conditions). Detailed mapping of contrast detection performance (for fixed object size) was tracked as a function of: display maximum luminance, ambient lighting changes (with and without recalibrating for the higher ambience), and the performance of radiologists vs. nonradiologists. Results: The initial phase was analyzed with a hierarchical linear model of observer performance using: background gray level, maximum display luminance, and radiologist vs. nonradiologist. The only statistically significant finding was a maximum luminance of 100 cd/m(2) display performing worse than a baseline peak of 400 cd/m(2). The second phase examined ambient lighting effects on detection thresholds. Background gray level and maximum display luminance were examined coupled with ambient lighting for: baseline at 30, 435 uncorrected, and 435 lx with display recalibration for the ambient conditions. Results showed ambient correction improved sensitivity for small background digital driving level, but not at higher luminance backgrounds. Conclusions: For CD study, nonradiologist observers can be used without loss of applicability. Contrast detection thresholds improved significantly between displays with peak luminance from 100 cd/m(2) to 200 cd/m(2), but improvement beyond that was not statistically significant for contrast detection thresholds in a reading room environment. Applying a calibration correction at high ambience (435 lx) improved detection tasks primarily in the darker background regions. (c) 2012 American Association of Physicists in Medicine. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.4742851]
引用
收藏
页码:5446 / 5456
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Two contrast adaptation processes: Contrast normalization and shifting, rectifying contrast comparison
    Wolfson, S. Sabina
    Graham, Norma
    JOURNAL OF VISION, 2009, 9 (04):
  • [22] Spatial contrast sensitivity and grating acuity of barn owls
    Harmening, Wolf M.
    Nikolay, Petra
    Orlowski, Julius
    Wagner, Hermann
    JOURNAL OF VISION, 2009, 9 (07):
  • [23] Comparison of low-contrast detail detectability with five different conventional and digital radiographic imaging systems
    Neitzel, U
    Böhm, A
    Maack, I
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2000: IMAGE PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 2000, 3981 : 216 - 223
  • [24] Resolution requirements for monitor viewing of digital flat-panel detector radiographs: a contrast detail analysis
    Peer, S
    Giacomuzzi, SM
    Peer, R
    Gassner, E
    Steingruber, I
    Jaschke, W
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2003, 13 (02) : 413 - 417
  • [25] Evaluating SEM Performance from the Contrast Transfer Function
    Joy, David C.
    Michael, Joseph
    Griffin, Brendan
    METROLOGY, INSPECTION, AND PROCESS CONTROL FOR MICROLITHOGRAPHY XXIV, 2010, 7638
  • [26] Effects of eccentricity on color contrast
    Vanston, John E.
    Crognale, Michael A.
    JOURNAL OF THE OPTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA A-OPTICS IMAGE SCIENCE AND VISION, 2018, 35 (04) : B122 - B129
  • [27] Method for the measurement of chromatic contrast
    Lin, Kai
    Liao, Ningfang
    Zhao, Dazun
    Li, Hongsong
    OPTICAL ENGINEERING, 2015, 54 (03)
  • [28] Attentional Modulation of Temporal Contrast Sensitivity in Human Vision
    Motoyoshi, Isamu
    PLOS ONE, 2011, 6 (04):
  • [29] EFFECT OF FLUORESCENT LIGHT SOURCES ON HUMAN CONTRAST SENSITIVITY
    Samu, Krisztian
    Nagy, Balazs Vince
    Ludas, Zsuzsanna
    Abraham, Gyoergy
    27TH SESSION OF THE CIE, VOL. 1, PTS 1 AND 2, 2011, : 931 - 935
  • [30] Preferential Loss of Contrast Decrement Responses in Human Glaucoma
    Norcia, Anthony M.
    Yakovleva, Alexandra
    Jehangir, Naz
    Goldberg, Jeffrey L.
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2022, 63 (11) : 16