Human contrast-detail performance with declining contrast

被引:1
|
作者
Walz-Flannigan, Alisa [2 ]
Babcock, Ben [3 ]
Kagadis, George C. [1 ]
Wang, Jihong [4 ]
Langer, Steve G. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Patras, Sch Med, Dept Med Phys, GR-26504 Rion, Greece
[2] Mayo Clin, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[3] Amer Registry Radiol Technologists, Mendota Hts, MN 55120 USA
[4] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
ambient lighting; contrast/detail performance; observer studies; display; GSDF; luminance; human visual system; DIGITAL CHEST RADIOGRAPHS; MONITOR LUMINANCE CHANGE; OBSERVER PERFORMANCE; DISPLAY SYSTEMS; AMBIENT LIGHT; SENSITIVITY; ILLUMINATION; RESOLUTION;
D O I
10.1118/1.4742851
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: How do display settings and ambient lighting affect contrast detection thresholds for human observers? Can recalibrating a display for high ambient lighting improve object detection? Methods: Contrast/detail (CD) threshold detection performance was measured for observers using four color displays with varying overall contrast (e.g., differing maximum luminance and ambient lighting conditions). Detailed mapping of contrast detection performance (for fixed object size) was tracked as a function of: display maximum luminance, ambient lighting changes (with and without recalibrating for the higher ambience), and the performance of radiologists vs. nonradiologists. Results: The initial phase was analyzed with a hierarchical linear model of observer performance using: background gray level, maximum display luminance, and radiologist vs. nonradiologist. The only statistically significant finding was a maximum luminance of 100 cd/m(2) display performing worse than a baseline peak of 400 cd/m(2). The second phase examined ambient lighting effects on detection thresholds. Background gray level and maximum display luminance were examined coupled with ambient lighting for: baseline at 30, 435 uncorrected, and 435 lx with display recalibration for the ambient conditions. Results showed ambient correction improved sensitivity for small background digital driving level, but not at higher luminance backgrounds. Conclusions: For CD study, nonradiologist observers can be used without loss of applicability. Contrast detection thresholds improved significantly between displays with peak luminance from 100 cd/m(2) to 200 cd/m(2), but improvement beyond that was not statistically significant for contrast detection thresholds in a reading room environment. Applying a calibration correction at high ambience (435 lx) improved detection tasks primarily in the darker background regions. (c) 2012 American Association of Physicists in Medicine. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.4742851]
引用
收藏
页码:5446 / 5456
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Contrast-detail curves in chest radiography
    Ogden, K
    Scalzetti, E
    Huda, W
    Saluja, J
    Lavallee, R
    Medical Imaging 2005: Image Perception, Observer Performance, and Technology Assessment, 2005, 5749 : 263 - 271
  • [2] ULTRASOUND CONTRAST-DETAIL ANALYSIS - A PRELIMINARY-STUDY IN HUMAN OBSERVER PERFORMANCE
    HALL, TJ
    INSANA, MF
    SOLLER, NM
    HARRISON, LA
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1993, 20 (01) : 117 - 127
  • [3] CONTRAST-DETAIL CURVES FOR LIVER CT
    JUDY, PF
    SWENSSON, RG
    NAWFEL, RD
    CHAN, KH
    SELTZER, SE
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1992, 19 (05) : 1167 - 1174
  • [4] The application of Markov theory to contrast-detail analysis
    Imai, K
    Ikeda, M
    Niimi, T
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2006, 13 (02) : 152 - 158
  • [5] A comparative contrast-detail study of five medical displays
    Samei, Ehsan
    Ranger, Nicole T.
    Delong, David M.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2008, 35 (04) : 1358 - 1364
  • [6] ULTRASOUND CONTRAST-DETAIL ANALYSIS - A COMPARISON OF LOW-CONTRAST DETECTABILITY AMONG SCANHEAD DESIGNS
    HALL, TJ
    INSANA, MF
    HARRISON, LA
    SOLLER, NM
    SCHLEHR, KJ
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1995, 22 (07) : 1117 - 1125
  • [7] Contrast-detail analysis of three flat panel detectors for digital radiography
    Borasi, Giovanni
    Samei, Ehsan
    Bertolini, Marco
    Nitrosi, Andrea
    Tassoni, Davide
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2006, 33 (06) : 1707 - 1719
  • [8] FLATTENING OF THE CONTRAST-DETAIL CURVE FOR LARGE LESIONS ON LIVER CT IMAGES
    SELTZER, SE
    JUDY, PF
    SWENSSON, RG
    CHAN, KH
    NAWFEL, RD
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1994, 21 (10) : 1547 - 1555
  • [9] Optimization of the exposure parameters in digital mammography using contrast-detail metrics
    Rojas, Leidy J.
    Fausto, Agnes M. F.
    Mol, Anderson W.
    Velasco, Fermin G.
    Abreu, P. O. S.
    Henriques, G.
    Furquim, T. A. C.
    PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2017, 42 : 13 - 18
  • [10] A SOFTWARE TOOL TO COMPARE CONTRAST-DETAIL DETECTION IN UNIFORM AND IN REAL MAMMOGRAPHIC BACKGROUNDS
    Prieto, Gabriel
    Chevalier, Margarita
    Guibelalde, Eduardo
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2011: IMAGE PERCEPTION, OBSERVER PERFORMANCE, AND TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, 2011, 7966