The spider does not always win the fight for attention: Disengagement from threat is modulated by goal set

被引:31
作者
Vromen, Joyce M. G. [1 ]
Lipp, Ottmar V. [1 ,2 ]
Remington, Roger W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Sch Psychol, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia
[2] Sch Psychol & Speech Pathol, Bentley, WA, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Stimulus-driven; Goal-driven; Threat; Attention; Fear; FEAR-RELEVANT STIMULI; TOP-DOWN; SELECTIVE ATTENTION; VISUAL-ATTENTION; CONTROL SETTINGS; CAPTURE; EMOTION; CONTINGENT; PICTURES; SEARCH;
D O I
10.1080/02699931.2014.969198
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Stimulus-driven preferential attention to threat can be modulated by goal-driven attention. However, it remains unclear how this goal-driven modulation affects specific attentional components implied in threat interference. We hypothesise that goal-driven modulation most strongly impacts delayed disengagement from threat. A spatial cueing task was used that disentangles delayed disengagement from attentional capture by tightly manipulating the locus of attention at the time of target onset. Different top-down goals were induced by instructing participants to identify bird/fish targets (Experiment 1) or spider/cat targets (Experiment 2) among animal non-targets. Delayed disengagement from a non-target spider was observed only when the spider was part of the target set, not when it was task-irrelevant. This corroborates evidence that threat stimuli do not necessarily override goal-driven attentional control and that extended processing of threatening distractors is not obligatory.
引用
收藏
页码:1185 / 1196
页数:12
相关论文
共 53 条
  • [1] Angry faces hold the eyes
    Belopolsky, Artem V.
    Devue, Christel
    Theeuwes, Jan
    [J]. VISUAL COGNITION, 2011, 19 (01) : 27 - 36
  • [2] What is top-down about contingent capture?
    Belopolsky, Artem V.
    Schreij, Daniel
    Theeuwes, Jan
    [J]. ATTENTION PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2010, 72 (02) : 326 - 341
  • [3] Emotion Improves and Impairs Early Vision
    Bocanegra, Bruno R.
    Zeelenberg, Rene
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2009, 20 (06) : 707 - 713
  • [4] Should I Stay or Should I Go? Attentional Disengagement From Visually Unique and Unexpected Items at Fixation
    Brockmole, James R.
    Boot, Walter R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 2009, 35 (03) : 808 - 815
  • [5] That baby caught my eye... Attention capture by infant faces
    Brosch, Tobias
    Sander, David
    Scherer, Klaus R.
    [J]. EMOTION, 2007, 7 (03) : 685 - 689
  • [6] The costs of switching attentional sets
    Dombrowe, Isabel
    Donk, Mieke
    Olivers, Christian N. L.
    [J]. ATTENTION PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2011, 73 (08) : 2481 - 2488
  • [7] The Roles of Feature-Specific Task Set and Bottom-Up Salience in Attentional Capture: An ERP Study
    Eimer, Martin
    Kiss, Monika
    Press, Clare
    Sauter, Disa
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 2009, 35 (05) : 1316 - 1328
  • [8] Additivity of abrupt onset effects supports nonspatial distraction, not the capture of spatial attention
    Folk, Charles L.
    Remington, Roger W.
    Wu, Shu-Chieh
    [J]. ATTENTION PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2009, 71 (02) : 308 - 313
  • [9] INVOLUNTARY COVERT ORIENTING IS CONTINGENT ON ATTENTIONAL CONTROL SETTINGS
    FOLK, CL
    REMINGTON, RW
    JOHNSTON, JC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 1992, 18 (04) : 1030 - 1044
  • [10] Better safe than sorry: Simplistic fear-relevant stimuli capture attention
    Forbes, Sarah J.
    Purkis, Helena M.
    Lipp, Ottmar V.
    [J]. COGNITION & EMOTION, 2011, 25 (05) : 794 - 804