The Refractive Status and Vision Profile: Evaluation of psychometric properties and comparison of Rasch and summated Likert-scaling

被引:94
作者
Garamendi, E
Pesudovs, K
Stevens, MJ
Elliott, DB
机构
[1] Univ Bradford, Dept Optometry, Bradford BD7 1DP, W Yorkshire, England
[2] Flinders Med Ctr, NH, Bedford Pk, SA 5042, Australia
[3] Flinders Med Ctr, MRC, Ctr Clin Eye Res, Dept Ophthalmol, Bedford Pk, SA 5042, Australia
[4] Flinders Univ S Australia, Bedford Pk, SA 5042, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Rasch analysis; quality of life; validity; psychometric analysis; questionnaire;
D O I
10.1016/j.visres.2005.07.007
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
The psychometric properties of the Refractive Status and Vision Profile (RSVP) questionnaire were evaluated using Rasch analysis. Ninety-one myopic patients from a refractive surgery clinic and general optometric practice completed the RSVP. Rasch analysis of the RSVP ordinal data was performed to examine for unidimensionality and item reduction. The traditional Likert-scoring system was compared with a Rasch-scored RSVP and a reduced item Rasch-scored RSVP. Rasch analysis of the original RSVP showed poor targeting of item difficulty to patient quality of life, items with a ceiling effect and underutilized response categories. Combining the underutilized response scales and removal of redundant and misfitting items improved the internal consistency and targeting of the RSVP, and the reduced 20-item Rasch scored RSVP showed greater relative precision over standard Likert scoring in discriminating between the two subject groups. A Rasch scaled quality of life questionnaire is recommended for use in refractive outcomes research. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1375 / 1383
页数:9
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [1] RATING FORMULATION FOR ORDERED RESPONSE CATEGORIES
    ANDRICH, D
    [J]. PSYCHOMETRIKA, 1978, 43 (04) : 561 - 573
  • [2] Patient satisfaction and visual symptoms after laser in situ keratomileusis
    Bailey, MD
    Mitchell, GL
    Dhaliwal, DK
    Wachler, BSB
    Zadnik, K
    [J]. OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2003, 110 (07) : 1371 - 1378
  • [3] Development of the National Eye Institute refractive error correction quality of life questionnaire - Focus groups
    Berry, S
    Mangione, CM
    Lindblad, AS
    McDonnell, PJ
    [J]. OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2003, 110 (12) : 2285 - 2291
  • [4] STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT
    BLAND, JM
    ALTMAN, DG
    [J]. LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) : 307 - 310
  • [5] WHAT IS COEFFICIENT ALPHA - AN EXAMINATION OF THEORY AND APPLICATIONS
    CORTINA, JM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1993, 78 (01) : 98 - 104
  • [6] Psychometric properties of vision-related quality of life questionnaires:: a systematic review
    de Boer, MR
    Moll, AC
    de Vet, HCW
    Terwee, CB
    Völker-Dieben, HJM
    van Rens, GHMB
    [J]. OPHTHALMIC AND PHYSIOLOGICAL OPTICS, 2004, 24 (04) : 257 - 273
  • [7] DeVellis R., 2017, SCALE DEV THEORY APP
  • [8] Fisher W P Jr, 1997, J Outcome Meas, V1, P329
  • [9] FISHER WP, 1994, OBJECTIVE MEASUREMEN, P36
  • [10] A comparison of Rasch with Likert scoring to discriminate between patients' evaluations of total hip replacement surgery
    Fitzpatrick, R
    Norquist, JM
    Jenkinson, C
    Reeves, BC
    Morris, RW
    Murray, DW
    Gregg, PJ
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2004, 13 (02) : 331 - 338