Modeling Imbalanced Economic Recovery Following a Natural Disaster Using Input-Output Analysis

被引:68
|
作者
Li, Jun [1 ]
Crawford-Brown, Douglas [1 ]
Syddall, Mark [1 ]
Guan, Dabo [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge, Dept Land Econ, 4CMR, Cambridge CB3 9EP, England
[2] Univ Leeds, Sch Earth & Environm, Leeds LS2 9JT, W Yorkshire, England
[3] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Appl Ecol, Shenyang 110016, Peoples R China
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Disaster; dynamic inequalities; input-output analysis; London flooding; rationing schemes; INOPERABILITY;
D O I
10.1111/risa.12040
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Input-output analysis is frequently used in studies of large-scale weather-related (e.g., Hurricanes and flooding) disruption of a regional economy. The economy after a sudden catastrophe shows a multitude of imbalances with respect to demand and production and may take months or years to recover. However, there is no consensus about how the economy recovers. This article presents a theoretical route map for imbalanced economic recovery called dynamic inequalities. Subsequently, it is applied to a hypothetical postdisaster economic scenario of flooding in London around the year 2020 to assess the influence of future shocks to a regional economy and suggest adaptation measures. Economic projections are produced by a macro econometric model and used as baseline conditions. The results suggest that London's economy would recover over approximately 70 months by applying a proportional rationing scheme under the assumption of initial 50% labor loss (with full recovery in six months), 40% initial loss to service sectors, and 10-30% initial loss to other sectors. The results also suggest that imbalance will be the norm during the postdisaster period of economic recovery even though balance may occur temporarily. Model sensitivity analysis suggests that a proportional rationing scheme may be an effective strategy to apply during postdisaster economic reconstruction, and that policies in transportation recovery and in health care are essential for effective postdisaster economic recovery.
引用
收藏
页码:1908 / 1923
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] DISASTER IMPACT AND INPUT-OUTPUT ANALYSIS
    Okuyama, Yasuhide
    Santos, Joost R.
    ECONOMIC SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2014, 26 (01) : 1 - 12
  • [2] On input-output economic models in disaster impact assessment
    Galbusera, Luca
    Giannopoulos, Georgios
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK REDUCTION, 2018, 30 : 186 - 198
  • [3] TIME-VARYING DISASTER RECOVERY MODEL FOR INTERDEPENDENT ECONOMIC SYSTEMS USING HYBRID INPUT-OUTPUT AND EVENT TREE ANALYSIS
    Santos, Joost R.
    Yu, Krista Danielle S.
    Pagsuyoin, Sheree Ann T.
    Tan, Raymond R.
    ECONOMIC SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2014, 26 (01) : 60 - 80
  • [4] The Recovery of the Input-Output Analysis in the Czech Republic
    Sixta, Jaroslav
    STATISTIKA-STATISTICS AND ECONOMY JOURNAL, 2019, 99 (03) : 235 - 245
  • [5] Modeling of Input-output Analysis on Mobile Service
    Zhao, Xiaohong
    Tang, Bingyong
    ICMECG: 2009 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT OF E-COMMERCE AND E-GOVERNMENT, PROCEEDINGS, 2009, : 396 - 399
  • [6] A minimum-disruption approach to input-output disaster analysis
    Li, Mengyu
    Lenzen, Manfred
    Pedauga, Luis E.
    Malik, Arunima
    SPATIAL ECONOMIC ANALYSIS, 2022, 17 (04) : 446 - 470
  • [7] Input-output modeling, outdoor recreation, and the economic impacts of weeds
    Eiswerth, ME
    Darden, TD
    Johnson, WS
    Agapoff, J
    Harris, TR
    WEED SCIENCE, 2005, 53 (01) : 130 - 137
  • [8] Economic impacts of the hotel industry: an input-output analysis
    Kim, Hyojin
    Kim, Byung-Gook
    TOURISM REVIEW, 2015, 70 (02) : 132 - 149
  • [9] The Economic Cost of Unsupplied Diesel Product in Korea Using Input-Output Analysis
    Kim, Myunghwan
    Yoo, Seung-Hoon
    ENERGIES, 2012, 5 (09) : 3465 - 3478
  • [10] Determining Stakeholder Influence Using Input-Output Modeling
    Hester, Patrick T.
    Adams, Kevin MacG.
    COMPLEX ADAPTIVE SYSTEMS: EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES FOR EVOLVING SYSTEMS: SOCIO-TECHNICAL, CYBER AND BIG DATA, 2013, 20 : 337 - 341