Simulating COVID-19 in a university environment

被引:70
作者
Gressman, Philip T. [1 ]
Peck, Jennifer R. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Dept Math, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Swarthmore Coll, Dept Econ, Swarthmore, PA 19081 USA
关键词
COVID-19; Coronavirus; SARS-CoV-2; Epidemics; Computational epidemiology; Agent-based modeling; Higher education; Post-secondary education; SPREAD;
D O I
10.1016/j.mbs.2020.108436
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Residential colleges and universities face unique challenges in providing in-person instruction during the COVID-19 pandemic. Administrators are currently faced with decisions about whether to open during the pandemic and what modifications of their normal operations might be necessary to protect students, faculty and staff. There is little information, however, on what measures are likely to be most effective and whether existing interventions could contain the spread of an outbreak on campus. We develop a full-scale stochastic agent-based model to determine whether in-person instruction could safely continue during the pandemic and evaluate the necessity of various interventions. Simulation results indicate that large scale randomized testing, contact-tracing, and quarantining are important components of a successful strategy for containing campus outbreaks. High test specificity is critical for keeping the size of the quarantine population manageable. Moving the largest classes online is also crucial for controlling both the size of outbreaks and the number of students in quarantine. Increased residential exposure can significantly impact the size of an outbreak, but it is likely more important to control non-residential social exposure among students. Finally, necessarily high quarantine rates even in controlled outbreaks imply significant absenteeism, indicating a need to plan for remote instruction of quarantined students.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [1] Modeling behavioral change and COVID-19 containment in Mexico: A trade-off between lockdown and compliance
    Adrian Acuna-Zegarra, Manuel
    Santana-Cibrian, Mario
    Velasco-Hernandez, Jorge X.
    [J]. MATHEMATICAL BIOSCIENCES, 2020, 325 (325)
  • [2] Comparing large-scale computational approaches to epidemic modeling: Agent-based versus structured metapopulation models
    Ajelli, Marco
    Goncalves, Bruno
    Balcan, Duygu
    Colizza, Vittoria
    Hu, Hao
    Ramasco, Jose J.
    Merler, Stefano
    Vespignani, Alessandro
    [J]. BMC INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2010, 10
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2020, IMP COLL LOND
  • [4] Estimates of the reproduction number for seasonal, pandemic, and zoonotic influenza: a systematic review of the literature
    Biggerstaff, Matthew
    Cauchemez, Simon
    Reed, Carrie
    Gambhir, Manoj
    Finelli, Lyn
    [J]. BMC INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2014, 14
  • [5] Blair A., 2020, TESTING LAGS EMERGIN, DOI [10.1101/2020.05.02.20086314, DOI 10.1101/2020.05.02.20086314]
  • [6] Social network-based distancing strategies to flatten the COVID-19 curve in a post-lockdown world
    Block, Per
    Hoffman, Marion
    Raabe, Isabel J.
    Dowd, Jennifer Beam
    Rahal, Charles
    Kashyap, Ridhi
    Mills, Melinda C.
    [J]. NATURE HUMAN BEHAVIOUR, 2020, 4 (06) : 588 - +
  • [7] CDC, 2020, Cases in the U.S.
  • [8] Modelling transmission and control of the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia
    Chang, Sheryl L.
    Harding, Nathan
    Zachreson, Cameron
    Cliff, Oliver M.
    Prokopenko, Mikhail
    [J]. NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2020, 11 (01)
  • [9] Physical distancing, face masks, and eye protection to prevent person-to-person transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chu, Derek K.
    Akl, Elie A.
    Duda, Stephanie
    Solo, Karla
    Yaacoub, Sally
    Schunemann, Holger J.
    [J]. LANCET, 2020, 395 (10242) : 1973 - 1987
  • [10] Cohen AN, 2020, FALSE POSITIVES REVE, DOI [10.1101/2020.04.26.20080911, DOI 10.1101/2020.04.26.20080911]