Shear bond strength and microleakage of novel glass-ionomer cements: An In vitro Study

被引:18
作者
Meral, E. [1 ]
Baseren, N. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Hacettepe Univ, Sch Dent, Dept Restorat Dent, TR-06100 Ankara, Turkey
关键词
Glass-carbomer cement; glass-ionomer cements; microleakage; shear bond strength; DENTAL RESTORATIONS; COMPOSITE; DURABILITY; COMPOMER; ADHESION; SEALANT; LEAKAGE; ENAMEL; CARIES;
D O I
10.4103/njcp.njcp_543_18
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: The overall success of dental restorations depends on the materials' ability to bond to dental structures and to eliminate the microleakage. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the shear bond strength (SBS) and microleakage of novel glass-ionomer restorative materials. Materials and Methods: In this study 62 intact molars were used, of which 30 molars were sectioned buccolingually, embedded in acrylic resin, and polished to obtain flat dentin surfaces. Then, glass-ionomer cylinders were built on the specimens (n = 15) with a high-viscosity glass-ionomer cement (GIC) (EQUIA Fil), a glass-carbomer (Glassfill), a zirconia-reinforced GIC (Zirconomer), or a conventional GIC (RivaSelfCure), and SBS testing was performed. For microleakage test, Class V cavities were prepared on buccal and lingual surfaces of the remaining 32 teeth and divided into four groups (n = 16). Each group was restored with one of four GICs and subjected to microleakage testing. The data were statistically analyzed (P = 0.05). Results: The highest SBS values were observed in Glassfill group (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences on the SBS values of other three materials (P 0.05). Regarding microleakage evaluations, no significant differences were observed at enamel margins (P 0.05), whereas at dentin margins, EQUIA Fil and Zirconomer showed less microleakage than Glassfill (P < 0.05). Conclusions: Although the glass-carbomer restorative materials revealed higher SBS, other tested materials might be more reliable in clinical use, as they offer better leakage resistance.
引用
收藏
页码:566 / 572
页数:7
相关论文
共 43 条
[21]   Comparative Evaluation of Fluoride Releasing Ability of Various Restorative Materials after the Application of Surface Coating Agents - An In-vitro Study [J].
Kishore, G. V. S. ;
Sai-Sankar, A. J. ;
Pratap-Gowd, M. J. S. ;
Sridhar, M. ;
Pranitha, Kakarla ;
Sai-Krishna, V. S. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH, 2016, 10 (12) :ZC38-ZC41
[22]   Compressive strength of two newly developed glass-ionomer materials for use with the Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) approach in class II cavities [J].
Koenraads, H. ;
Van der Kroon, G. ;
Frencken, J. E. .
DENTAL MATERIALS, 2009, 25 (04) :551-556
[23]   Longevity of materials for pit and fissure sealing-Results from a meta-analysis [J].
Kuehnisch, Jan ;
Mansmann, Ulrich ;
Heinrich-Weltzien, Roswitha ;
Hickel, Reinhard .
DENTAL MATERIALS, 2012, 28 (03) :298-303
[24]   Noncarious cervical lesions and abfractions - A re-evaluation [J].
Litonjua, LA ;
Andreana, S ;
Bush, PJ ;
Tobias, TS ;
Cohen, RE .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION, 2003, 134 (07) :845-850
[25]   INVITRO STUDY OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES OF A GLASS IONOMER CEMENT [J].
MALDONADO, A ;
SWARTZ, ML ;
PHILLIPS, RW .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION, 1978, 96 (05) :785-791
[26]  
Mali P, 2006, J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent, V24, P15
[27]  
Matis B A, 1996, Quintessence Int, V27, P373
[28]   EVALUATION OF MATERIALS AND TECHNIQUES FOR RESTORATION OF EROSION AREAS [J].
MONTEIRO, S ;
SIGURJONS, H ;
SWARTZ, ML ;
PHILLIPS, RW ;
RHODES, BF .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1986, 55 (04) :434-442
[29]  
Murthy S Srinivasa, 2015, J Int Oral Health, V7, P103
[30]   Modifications in Glass Ionomer Cements: Nano-Sized Fillers and Bioactive Nanoceramics [J].
Najeeb, Shariq ;
Khurshid, Zohaib ;
Zafar, Muhammad Sohail ;
Khan, Abdul Samad ;
Zohaib, Sana ;
Nunez Marti, Juan Manuel ;
Sauro, Salvatore ;
Matinlinna, Jukka Pekka ;
Rehman, Ihtesham Ur .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR SCIENCES, 2016, 17 (07)