Substituting specialist care for patients with severe mental illness with primary healthcare. Experiences in a mixed methods study

被引:7
作者
Beckers, Thijs [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Koekkoek, Bauke [1 ,4 ]
Tiemens, Bea [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Jaeqx-van Tienen, Lia [2 ]
Hutschemaekers, Giel [3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Nijmegen Univ Appl Sci, Hgsk Arnhem, Res Grp Social Psychiat & Mental Hlth Nursing, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] METggz, Roermond, Netherlands
[3] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Inst Behav Sci, Clin Psychol, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[4] Pro Persona, Res Inst, Wolfheze, Netherlands
[5] Indigo, Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
discharge; matched care; primary care; recovery; referral; severe mental illness; SHARED DECISION-MAKING; SELF-STIGMA; TRAINING-PROGRAM; SERVICE USERS; RECOVERY; PROFESSIONALS; PEOPLE; IMPLEMENTATION; DEPENDENCY; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1111/jpm.12499
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Accessible summary What is known on the subject? Care planning and coordination are currently insufficiently based on scientific insights due to a lack of knowledge on this topic. Most patients with severe mental illness receive long-term treatment from specialized mental health services. This long-term, highly intensive treatment is not always the best option for two reasons. Firstly, because as long as a patient receives intensive treatment aimed at safety, it is hard for that patient to take full responsibility for their own life. Secondly, because care is not available unlimitedly, some patients are waiting to receive specialist mental healthcare while others who do not need it anymore still receive it. Most stable patients with severe mental illness can be treated outside of specialized mental health services. Some patients are too dependent on a specific mental healthcare professional to be referred to primary healthcare. In such instances, a referral will most likely lead to destabilization and the referral will therefore be unsuccessful. Patients preferred primary healthcare to specialized mental health services, mainly because of the absence of stigma associated with the latter. There should be more attention for personal recovery (especially the social support system) of patients with severe mental illness who are referred to primary healthcare services. What are the implications for practice? Most stable patients with severe mental illness can be treated in primary healthcare. Professionals in primary healthcare should keep personal recovery in mind when treating patients, focusing on problem solving skills and also making use of social support systems. Abstract Aim/question Care planning and coordination are currently insufficiently based on scientific insights due to a lack of knowledge on this topic. In the United Kingdom and the Netherlands, most patients with severe mental illness receive long-term specialized mental healthcare, even when they are stable. This study aims to explore the outcome of these stable patients when they are referred to primary healthcare. Methods Patients (N=32) receiving specialized mental healthcare that were referred to primary healthcare were interviewed in focus groups, as were the involved professionals (N=6). Results 84% of the participants still received primary healthcare after 12months. Despite the successful referral, the patient's personal recovery did not always profit. The participants of the focus groups agreed that some patients were too dependent on a specific mental healthcare professional to be referred to primary healthcare. Discussion Most stable patients with severe mental illness can be referred to primary healthcare. Personal recovery and dependency on a specific healthcare provider should be considered when referring a patient to primary healthcare. Implications for practice Professionals in community mental healthcare teams should consider a referral to primary mental healthcare in stable patients. Professionals in primary healthcare should keep the patient's personal recovery in mind.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 10
页数:10
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [1] Shared decision-making preferences of people with severe mental illness
    Adams, Jared R.
    Drake, Robert E.
    Wolford, George L.
    [J]. PSYCHIATRIC SERVICES, 2007, 58 (09) : 1219 - 1221
  • [2] [Anonymous], PRIMARY CARE MENTAL
  • [3] [Anonymous], COMMUNITY MENT HLTH
  • [4] Anthony W.A., 1993, Psychosocial Rehabilitation Journal, V16, P11, DOI DOI 10.1037/H0095655
  • [5] Potential predictive factors for successful referral from specialist mental-health services to less intensive treatment: A concept mapping study
    Beckers, Thijs
    Koekkoek, Bauke
    Hutschemaekers, Giel
    Tiemens, Bea
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (06):
  • [6] What does dependency on community mental health services mean? A conceptual review with a systematic search
    Bonavigo, Tommaso
    Sandhu, Sima
    Pascolo-Fabrici, Elisabetta
    Priebe, Stefan
    [J]. SOCIAL PSYCHIATRY AND PSYCHIATRIC EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2016, 51 (04) : 561 - 574
  • [7] Bower P, 2002, BRIT J GEN PRACT, V52, P926
  • [8] A cluster randomised controlled trial and process evaluation of a training programme for mental health professionals to enhance user involvement in care planning in service users with severe mental health issues (EQUIP): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
    Bower, Peter
    Roberts, Chris
    O'Leary, Neil
    Callaghan, Patrick
    Bee, Penny
    Fraser, Claire
    Gibbons, Chris
    Olleveant, Nicola
    Rogers, Anne
    Davies, Linda
    Drake, Richard
    Sanders, Caroline
    Meade, Oonagh
    Grundy, Andrew
    Walker, Lauren
    Cree, Lindsey
    Berzins, Kathryn
    Brooks, Helen
    Beatty, Susan
    Cahoon, Patrick
    Rolfe, Anita
    Lovell, Karina
    [J]. TRIALS, 2015, 16
  • [9] Central committee on research involving human subjects, 2018, YOUR RES DOES IT FAL
  • [10] Davies M., 2006, ADV PSYCHIAT TREATME, V12, P384, DOI DOI 10.1192/APT.12.5.384