Validity and reliability of the community integration program questionnaire

被引:1
|
作者
Glenn, Mel
Goldstein, Richard
Selleck, Elizabeth
Rotman, Michelle
Jacob, Loyal
机构
[1] Spaulding Rehabil Hosp, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
brain injury; community integration; validity; reliability;
D O I
10.1097/01.mrr.0000191848.18564.cc
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
The Community Integration Program Questionnaire was developed to measure various quantifiable characteristics of community integration programs for people with brain injury. There are three versions: one for outpatient facility-based, one for residential and one for home programs. In this study questionnaires were administered to directors and associate directors of seven programs. A research assistant then went on-site to collect corresponding data using patient records, planning books and schedules, annual and quarterly reports, employee lists, staff curricula vitae, census data, insurance payment data, team meeting notes, incident reports, and staff logs. Matching criteria between questionnaire and on-site data were established before either was collected. The survey data matched data acquired on-site in 42.2, 56.4, and 56.8% of questions in the three versions, respectively. Interviewers and a second listener recorded the same information 91.5% of the time across seven program interviews. For two programs, comparisons between a Program Director and Program Coordinator yielded matches on 42.8 and 40.6% of questions, respectively. In conclusion, the Community Integration Program Questionnaire does not have acceptable construct validity and inter-rater reliability. Researchers requiring information about quantifiable characteristics of community integration programs should go on-site to collect the data.
引用
收藏
页码:117 / 121
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Reliability and validity of Turkish translation of the pediatric sleep questionnaire
    Oner, Pinar
    Barut, Yasar
    Oner, Ozgur
    Uneri, Ozden Sukran
    Bodur, Sahin
    Turgut, Sevil
    Munir, Kerim M.
    KLINIK PSIKOFARMAKOLOJI BULTENI-BULLETIN OF CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2009, 19 (04): : 382 - 395
  • [42] TURKISH VERSION OF THE WORKING MEMORY QUESTIONNAIRE: RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY
    Aksoy, Cihan Caner
    Saracoglu, Ismail
    Akkurt, Lutfiye
    JOURNAL OF BASIC AND CLINICAL HEALTH SCIENCES, 2022, 6 (02): : 67 - 73
  • [43] Reliability and validity of a brief sleep questionnaire for children in Japan
    Masakazu Okada
    Shingo Kitamura
    Yoshitaka Iwadare
    Hisateru Tachimori
    Yuichi Kamei
    Shigekazu Higuchi
    Kazuo Mishima
    Journal of Physiological Anthropology, 36
  • [44] Reliability and Validity of the Mobile Phone Usability Questionnaire (MPUQ)
    Ryu, Young Sam
    Smith-Jackson, Tonya L.
    JOURNAL OF USABILITY STUDIES, 2006, 2 (01) : 39 - 53
  • [45] The Adolescent Insomnia Questionnaire: the Turkish validity and reliability study
    Tekcan, Pinar
    Erdem, Emine
    REVISTA DA ASSOCIACAO MEDICA BRASILEIRA, 2024, 70 (07):
  • [46] Reliability and validity of television food advertising questionnaire in Malaysia
    Zalma, Abdul Razak
    Safiah, Md. Yusof
    Ajau, Danis
    Anuar, Md. Isa Khairil
    HEALTH PROMOTION INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 30 (03) : 523 - 530
  • [47] Validity and reliability of the Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire in German
    Plath, Michaela
    Sand, Matthias
    van de Weyer, Philipp S.
    Baierl, Kilian
    Praetorius, Mark
    Plinkert, Peter K.
    Baumann, Ingo
    Zaoui, Karim
    HNO, 2022, 70 (06) : 422 - 435
  • [48] The validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire
    Sarmer, S
    Ergin, S
    Yavuzer, G
    RHEUMATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2000, 20 (01) : 9 - 12
  • [49] Reliability and validity study of parental feeding style questionnaire
    Ozcetin, Mustafa
    Yilmaz, Resul
    Erkorkmaz, Uenal
    Esmeray, Haluk
    TURK PEDIATRI ARSIVI-TURKISH ARCHIVES OF PEDIATRICS, 2010, 45 (02): : 124 - 131
  • [50] Reliability and Validity of the German Version of the Emotional Style Questionnaire
    Jekauc, Darko
    Muelberger, Lea
    Weyland, Susanne
    Ennigkeit, Fabienne
    Wunsch, Kathrin
    Krell-Roesch, Janina
    Fritsch, Julian
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 12