Validity and reliability of the community integration program questionnaire

被引:1
|
作者
Glenn, Mel
Goldstein, Richard
Selleck, Elizabeth
Rotman, Michelle
Jacob, Loyal
机构
[1] Spaulding Rehabil Hosp, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
brain injury; community integration; validity; reliability;
D O I
10.1097/01.mrr.0000191848.18564.cc
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
The Community Integration Program Questionnaire was developed to measure various quantifiable characteristics of community integration programs for people with brain injury. There are three versions: one for outpatient facility-based, one for residential and one for home programs. In this study questionnaires were administered to directors and associate directors of seven programs. A research assistant then went on-site to collect corresponding data using patient records, planning books and schedules, annual and quarterly reports, employee lists, staff curricula vitae, census data, insurance payment data, team meeting notes, incident reports, and staff logs. Matching criteria between questionnaire and on-site data were established before either was collected. The survey data matched data acquired on-site in 42.2, 56.4, and 56.8% of questions in the three versions, respectively. Interviewers and a second listener recorded the same information 91.5% of the time across seven program interviews. For two programs, comparisons between a Program Director and Program Coordinator yielded matches on 42.8 and 40.6% of questions, respectively. In conclusion, the Community Integration Program Questionnaire does not have acceptable construct validity and inter-rater reliability. Researchers requiring information about quantifiable characteristics of community integration programs should go on-site to collect the data.
引用
收藏
页码:117 / 121
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] THE ALCOHOL-PROBLEMS QUESTIONNAIRE - RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY
    WILLIAMS, BTR
    DRUMMOND, DC
    DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE, 1994, 35 (03) : 239 - 243
  • [22] The Validity and Reliability of the Trypophobia Questionnaire Turkish Form
    Yilmaz, Onur
    Kilicarslan, Tezer
    Boyraz, Rabia Kevser
    Parlakkaya, Busra
    Deveci, Erdem
    Ozturk, Ahmet
    TURK PSIKIYATRI DERGISI, 2020, 31 (04) : 244 - 251
  • [23] Emotional Abuse Questionnaire: a validity and reliability study
    Celik, Melike Yavas
    Elmaoglu, Erhan
    SOCIAL WORK IN HEALTH CARE, 2022, : 483 - 498
  • [24] Reliability and validity of the Satisfaction with Hospital Care Questionnaire
    Hendriks, AAJ
    Oort, FJ
    Vrielink, MR
    Smets, EMA
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 2002, 14 (06) : 471 - 482
  • [25] The multidimensional relationship questionnaire:: A study of reliability and validity
    Büyüksahin, A
    TURK PSIKIYATRI DERGISI, 2005, 16 (02) : 97 - 105
  • [26] Validity and reliability study for the Turkish version of the community integration scale for adults with psychiatric disorders
    Atay, Eda Acikgoz
    Gencarslan, Derya Ozbas
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC NURSING, 2023, 14 (04): : 298 - 304
  • [27] The validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire
    S. Sarmer
    S. Ergin
    G. Yavuzer
    Rheumatology International, 2000, 20 : 9 - 12
  • [28] Reliability and Validity of the Questionnaire for Autism Environment: A pilot survey
    Ghazali, Roslinda
    Sakip, Siti Rasidah Md
    Samsuddin, Ismail
    ENVIRONMENT-BEHAVIOUR PROCEEDINGS JOURNAL, 2020, 5 (15): : 205 - 212
  • [29] Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire
    Akmaz, Hazel Ekin
    Uyar, Meltem
    Yildirim, Yasemin Kuzeyli
    Korhan, Esra Akin
    BALKAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2018, 35 (03) : 238 - 244
  • [30] Reliability and validity of the sexual life quality questionnaire (SLQQ)
    Jean M.B. Woodward
    Steven L. Hass
    Paul J. Woodward
    Quality of Life Research, 2002, 11 : 365 - 377