Single-port laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with transanal resection (transabdominal transanal resection) for low rectal cancer: Initial experience with 22 cases

被引:13
|
作者
Choi, Byung Jo [1 ]
Lee, Sang Chul [1 ]
Kang, Won Kyung [2 ]
机构
[1] Catholic Univ Korea, Daejeon St Marys Hosp, Dept Surg, Taejon, South Korea
[2] Catholic Univ Korea, Dept Surg, Seoul St Marys Hosp, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
Single-port laparoscopic surgery (SPLS); Transabdominal transanal resection (TATAR); Total mesorectal excision (TME); Low rectal cancer; LOW ANTERIOR RESECTION; COLOANAL ANASTOMOSIS; ANAL ANASTOMOSIS; RIGHT COLECTOMY; PULL-THROUGH; SURGERY; APPENDECTOMY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijsu.2013.08.003
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Total mesorectal excisions (TME) with transanal resection and coloanal anastomosis (CAA) represent one of the standard surgical treatments for low rectal cancers. We report our initial experiences with trans-abdominal trans-anal resections (TATAR) with TME, performed using a single-port laparoscopic surgeries (SPLS) approach for low rectal cancers. Methods: Between June 2009 and April 2011, 22 low rectal cancer patients underwent SPLS TATAR with TME. SPLS was performed transumbilically or through predetermined stoma sites. Conventional laparoscopic instruments were used, and the intracorporeal procedures and range of operation did not differ. After a full laparoscopic TME to the pelvic floor muscles, the specimen was pulled through the anus. CAA was completed with transanal hand sewn sutures. Patient and tumor characteristics and operative, pathologic, and postoperative outcomes were studied. Results: SPLS TATAR with TME was successful in all patients. No additional incisions for trocars or conversions to open surgery were performed. The median incision length, operative time, and postoperative length of stay were 2.0 cm (range: 1.5-2.5), 260 min (range: 190-380), and 6 days (range: 4-16), respectively. The median number of harvested lymph nodes was 22 (range: 9-42). The median distal margin from the tumor was 2.0 cm (range: 0.3-4.0). No intraoperative complications were noted. Conclusions: SPLS TATAR with TME was safe and feasible. In addition to cosmetic advantages, oncologic requirements for specimens, including adequate margins and sufficient lymph node harvesting could be fulfilled entirely. However, the technique and oncologic safety warrant further evaluation and prospective randomized studies. (C) 2013 Surgical Associates Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:858 / 863
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Potential sexual function improvement by using transanal mesorectal approach for laparoscopic low rectal cancer excision
    Pontallier, Arnaud
    Denost, Quentin
    Van Geluwe, Bart
    Adam, Jean-Philippe
    Celerier, Bertrand
    Rullier, Eric
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2016, 30 (11): : 4924 - 4933
  • [42] Could Stoma Be Avoided after Laparoscopic Low Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer? Experience with Transanal Tube in 195 Cases
    Sciuto, Antonio
    Peltrini, Roberto
    Andreoli, Federica
    Di Santo Albini, Andrea Gianmario
    Di Nuzzo, Maria Michela
    Pirozzi, Nello
    Filotico, Marcello
    Lauria, Federica
    Boccia, Giuseppe
    D'Ambra, Michele
    Lionetti, Ruggero
    De Werra, Carlo
    Pirozzi, Felice
    Corcione, Francesco
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2022, 11 (09)
  • [43] Down-to-up transanal rectal resection with total mesorectal excision assisted by single-incision laparoscopy - a video vignette
    Dapri, G.
    Grozdev, K.
    Guta, D.
    Cadiere, G. -B.
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2016, 18 (05) : 517 - 518
  • [44] A Step Toward NOTES Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer Endoscopic Transanal Proctectomy
    Tuech, Jean-Jacques
    Karoui, Mehdi
    Lelong, Bernard
    De Chaisemartin, Cecile
    Bridoux, Valerie
    Manceau, Gilles
    Delpero, Jean-Robert
    Hanoun, Laurent
    Michot, Francis
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2015, 261 (02) : 228 - 233
  • [45] Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision (TaTME) versus Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision for Lower Rectal Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis
    Lin, Yueh-Chen
    Kuo, Ya-Ting
    You, Jeng-Fu
    Chern, Yih-Jong
    Hsu, Yu-Jen
    Yu, Yen-Lin
    Chiang, Jy-Ming
    Yeh, Chien-Yuh
    Hsieh, Pao-Shiu
    Liao, Chun-Kai
    CANCERS, 2022, 14 (17)
  • [46] Functional outcomes after resections for low rectal tumors: comparison of Transanal with laparoscopic Total Mesorectal excision
    Rubinkiewicz, Mateusz
    Zarzycki, Piotr
    Witowski, Jan
    Pisarska, Magdalena
    Gajewska, Natalia
    Torbicz, Grzegorz
    Nowakowski, Michal
    Major, Piotr
    Budzynski, Andrzej
    Pedziwiatr, Michal
    BMC SURGERY, 2019, 19 (1)
  • [47] Current Trends in the Management of Low Rectal Tumors: Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision
    Chevallay, Mickael
    Meyer, Jeremy
    Wassmer, Charles-Henri
    Ris, Frederic
    Toso, Christian
    Buchs, Nicolas C.
    CURRENT COLORECTAL CANCER REPORTS, 2019, 15 (03) : 90 - 97
  • [48] Transanal total mesorectal excision and delayed coloanal anastomosis without stoma for low rectal cancer
    Seow-En, I
    Ng, Y. Y-R
    Tan, I. B. H.
    Tan, E. K-W
    TECHNIQUES IN COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2023, 27 (01) : 75 - 81
  • [49] Quality of life after rectal cancer surgery: differences between laparoscopic and transanal total mesorectal excision
    Marloes Veltcamp Helbach
    Thomas W. A. Koedam
    Joep J. Knol
    Simone Velthuis
    H. Jaap Bonjer
    Jurriaan B. Tuynman
    Colin Sietses
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2019, 33 : 79 - 87
  • [50] A meta-analysis comparing transanal vs. laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer
    Martinez-Perez, A.
    de'Angelis, N.
    Brunetti, F.
    EJSO, 2017, 43 (04): : 847 - 848