Single-port laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with transanal resection (transabdominal transanal resection) for low rectal cancer: Initial experience with 22 cases

被引:13
|
作者
Choi, Byung Jo [1 ]
Lee, Sang Chul [1 ]
Kang, Won Kyung [2 ]
机构
[1] Catholic Univ Korea, Daejeon St Marys Hosp, Dept Surg, Taejon, South Korea
[2] Catholic Univ Korea, Dept Surg, Seoul St Marys Hosp, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
Single-port laparoscopic surgery (SPLS); Transabdominal transanal resection (TATAR); Total mesorectal excision (TME); Low rectal cancer; LOW ANTERIOR RESECTION; COLOANAL ANASTOMOSIS; ANAL ANASTOMOSIS; RIGHT COLECTOMY; PULL-THROUGH; SURGERY; APPENDECTOMY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijsu.2013.08.003
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Total mesorectal excisions (TME) with transanal resection and coloanal anastomosis (CAA) represent one of the standard surgical treatments for low rectal cancers. We report our initial experiences with trans-abdominal trans-anal resections (TATAR) with TME, performed using a single-port laparoscopic surgeries (SPLS) approach for low rectal cancers. Methods: Between June 2009 and April 2011, 22 low rectal cancer patients underwent SPLS TATAR with TME. SPLS was performed transumbilically or through predetermined stoma sites. Conventional laparoscopic instruments were used, and the intracorporeal procedures and range of operation did not differ. After a full laparoscopic TME to the pelvic floor muscles, the specimen was pulled through the anus. CAA was completed with transanal hand sewn sutures. Patient and tumor characteristics and operative, pathologic, and postoperative outcomes were studied. Results: SPLS TATAR with TME was successful in all patients. No additional incisions for trocars or conversions to open surgery were performed. The median incision length, operative time, and postoperative length of stay were 2.0 cm (range: 1.5-2.5), 260 min (range: 190-380), and 6 days (range: 4-16), respectively. The median number of harvested lymph nodes was 22 (range: 9-42). The median distal margin from the tumor was 2.0 cm (range: 0.3-4.0). No intraoperative complications were noted. Conclusions: SPLS TATAR with TME was safe and feasible. In addition to cosmetic advantages, oncologic requirements for specimens, including adequate margins and sufficient lymph node harvesting could be fulfilled entirely. However, the technique and oncologic safety warrant further evaluation and prospective randomized studies. (C) 2013 Surgical Associates Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:858 / 863
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision for Ultralow Rectal Cancer with Transanal Intersphincteric Dissection as a First Step: A Single-surgeon Experience
    Maglio, Riccardo
    Meucci, Massimo
    Muzi, Marco Gallinella
    Maglio, Marianna
    Masoni, Luigi
    AMERICAN SURGEON, 2014, 80 (01) : 26 - 30
  • [32] Quality of life after rectal cancer surgery: differences between laparoscopic and transanal total mesorectal excision
    Helbach, Marloes Veltcamp
    Koedam, Thomas W. A.
    Knol, Joep J.
    Velthuis, Simone
    Bonjer, H. Jaap
    Tuynman, Jurriaan B.
    Sietses, Colin
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2019, 33 (01): : 79 - 87
  • [33] Single incision and reduced port laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer: initial experience in 96 cases
    Jung, Kyung Uk
    Yun, Seong Hyeon
    Cho, Yong Beom
    Kim, Hee Cheol
    Lee, Woo Yong
    Chun, Ho-Kyung
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2016, 86 (05) : 403 - 407
  • [34] Transanal total mesorectal excision with intersphincteric resection and use of fluorescent angiography and a lighted urethral stent for distal rectal cancer
    Mabardy, A.
    Lee, L.
    Valpato, A. P.
    Atallah, S.
    TECHNIQUES IN COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2017, 21 (07) : 581 - 582
  • [35] New perspectives in rectal cancer surgery: Transanal total mesorectal excision
    Papp Geza
    Banky Balazs
    Lakatos Miklos
    Svastics Imre
    Burany Akos
    Bursics Attila
    ORVOSI HETILAP, 2018, 159 (01) : 16 - 22
  • [36] Oncologic Outcomes After Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer
    Maykel, Justin A.
    Hahn, Sue J.
    Beauharnais, Catherine C.
    Meyer, David C.
    Hill, Susanna S.
    Sturrock, Paul R.
    Davids, Jennifer S.
    Alavi, Karim
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2022, 65 (06) : 827 - 836
  • [37] Hybrid NOTES: TEO for transanal total mesorectal excision: intracorporeal resection and anastomosis
    Serra-Aracil, Xavier
    Mora-Lopez, Laura
    Casalots, Alex
    Pericay, Carles
    Guerrero, Raul
    Navarro-Soto, Salvador
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2016, 30 (01): : 346 - 354
  • [38] Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision in Lower Rectal Cancer: Comparison of Short-Term Outcomes with Conventional Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision
    Chang, Tung-Cheng
    Kiu, Kee-Thai
    JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2018, 28 (04): : 365 - 369
  • [39] Single-Port Access Laparoscopic Surgery for Rectal Cancer: Initial Experience With 10 Cases
    Bulut, Orhan
    Nielsen, Claus B.
    Jespersen, Niels
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2011, 54 (07) : 803 - 809
  • [40] Laparoscopic modified double stapling technique with transanal resection for low anterior resection of rectal cancer
    Illuminati, Giulio
    Krizzuk, Dimitri
    Pizzardi, Giulia
    Perotti, Bruno
    Pasqua, Rocco
    Urciuoli, Paolo
    ANNALI ITALIANI DI CHIRURGIA, 2019, 90 (01) : 78 - 82