Developing a measure of provider adherence to improve the implementation of behavioral health services in primary care: a Delphi study

被引:33
作者
Beehler, Gregory P. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Funderburk, Jennifer S. [4 ,5 ,6 ]
Possemato, Kyle [4 ,5 ]
Vair, Christina L. [1 ,7 ]
机构
[1] VA WNY Healthcare Syst, VA Ctr Integrated Healthcare, Buffalo, NY USA
[2] SUNY Buffalo, Sch Nursing, Buffalo, NY 14260 USA
[3] SUNY Buffalo, Sch Publ Hlth & Hlth Profess, Buffalo, NY 14260 USA
[4] Syracuse VA Med Ctr, VA Ctr Integrated Healthcare, Syracuse, NY USA
[5] Syracuse Univ, Dept Psychol, Syracuse, NY USA
[6] Univ Rochester, Dept Psychiat, Rochester, NY USA
[7] Univ Colorado, Dept Psychol, Colorado Springs, CO 80933 USA
来源
IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE | 2013年 / 8卷
关键词
Primary healthcare; Mental health services; Guideline adherence; Delphi technique; INTEGRATED PRIMARY-CARE; MENTAL-HEALTH; FIDELITY; FRAMEWORK; INTERVENTIONS; FOUNDATION; ACCESS;
D O I
10.1186/1748-5908-8-19
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The integration of behavioral health services into primary care is increasingly popular, yet fidelity of implementation in this area has been infrequently assessed due to the few measurement tools available. A sentinel indicator of fidelity of implementation is provider adherence, or utilization of prescribed procedures and engagement in model-specific behaviors. This study aimed to develop the first self-report measure of behavioral health provider adherence for co-located, collaborative care, a commonly adopted model of behavioral health service delivery in primary care. Methods: A preliminary 56-item measure was developed by the research team to represent critical components of adherence among behavioral health providers. To ensure the content validity of the measure, a modified Delphi study was conducted using a panel of co-located, collaborative care model experts. During three rounds of emailed surveys, panel members provided qualitative feedback regarding item content while rating each item's relevance for behavioral health provider practice. Items with consensus ratings of 80% or greater were included in the final adherence measure. Results: The panel consisted of 25 experts representing the Department of Veterans Affairs, the Department of Defense, and academic and community health centers (total study response rate of 76%). During the Delphi process, two new items were added to the measure, four items were eliminated, and a high level of consensus was achieved on the remaining 54 items. Experts identified 38 items essential for model adherence, six items compatible (although not essential) for model adherence, and 10 items that represented prohibited behaviors. Item content addressed several domains, but primarily focused on behaviors related to employing a time-limited, brief treatment model, the scope of patient concerns addressed, and interventions used by providers. Conclusions: This study yielded the first content valid self-report measure of critical components of collaborative care adherence for use by behavioral health providers in primary care. Although additional psychometric evaluation is necessary, this measure may assist implementation researchers in clarifying how provider behaviors contribute to clinical outcomes. This measure may also assist clinical stakeholders in monitoring implementation and identifying ways to support frontline providers in delivering high quality services.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2008, Treatment of common hip fractures. Evidence report/technology assessment no. 184 (prepared by the Minnesota evidence-based practice center under contract no. HHSA 290 2007 10064 1)
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2002, The Delphi Method
[3]   Patient exit interviews for assessing fidelity to the VA VISN 2 Integrated Primary Care Model: Results from a pilot feasibility study [J].
Beehler, Gregory P. ;
Finnell, Deborah S. ;
Foltz, Kelly ;
Edwards, Dawn .
JOURNAL OF INTERPROFESSIONAL CARE, 2010, 24 (03) :323-326
[4]   Enhancing treatment fidelity in health behavior change studies: Best practices and recommendations from the NIH behavior change consortium [J].
Bellg, AJ ;
Borrelli, B ;
Resnick, B ;
Hecht, J ;
Minicucci, DS ;
Ory, M ;
Ogedegbe, G ;
Orwig, D ;
Ernst, D ;
Czajkowski, S .
HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 23 (05) :443-451
[5]  
Blount A, 1998, INTEGRATED PRIMARY CARE, P1
[6]   Addressing the Workforce Crisis in Integrated Primary Care [J].
Blount, F. Alexander ;
Miller, Benjamin F. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY IN MEDICAL SETTINGS, 2009, 16 (01) :113-119
[7]   A new tool to assess treatment fidelity and evaluation of treatment fidelity across 10 years of health behavior research [J].
Borrelli, B ;
Sepinwall, D ;
Ernst, D ;
Bellg, AJ ;
Czajkowski, S ;
Breger, R ;
DeFrancesco, C ;
Levesque, C ;
Sharp, DL ;
Ogedegbe, G ;
Resnick, B ;
Orwig, D .
JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2005, 73 (05) :852-860
[8]   St. Louis Initiative for Integrated Care Excellence (SLI2CE): Integrated-Collaborative Care on a Large Scale Model [J].
Brawer, Peter A. ;
Martielli, Richard ;
Pye, Patrice L. ;
Manwaring, Jamie ;
Tierney, Anna .
FAMILIES SYSTEMS & HEALTH, 2010, 28 (02) :175-187
[9]   Impact of Behavioral Health Consultant Interventions on Patient Symptoms and Functioning in an Integrated Family Medicine Clinic [J].
Bryan, Craig J. ;
Morrow, Chad ;
Appolonio, Kathryn Kanzler .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 65 (03) :281-293
[10]   A conceptual framework for implementation fidelity [J].
Carroll, Christopher ;
Patterson, Malcolm ;
Wood, Stephen ;
Booth, Andrew ;
Rick, Jo ;
Balain, Shashi .
IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2007, 2