Knowledge-inspired operational reliability for optimal LNG production at the offshore site

被引:13
作者
Ali, Wahid [1 ]
Qyyum, Muhammad Abdul [2 ]
Khan, Mohd Shariq [3 ]
Pham Luu Trung Duong [2 ]
Lee, Moonyong [2 ]
机构
[1] Jazan Univ, Dept Chem Engn Technol, Jazan, Saudi Arabia
[2] Yeungnam Univ, Sch Chem Engn, Gyongsan 712749, South Korea
[3] Dhofar Univ, Dept Chem Engn, Salalah, Oman
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Reliability enhancement; Uncertainty quantification; Natural gas liquefaction; LNG; SMR process; GAS LIQUEFACTION PROCESS; EXPANDER REFRIGERATION CYCLE; LIQUEFIED NATURAL-GAS; MIXED-REFRIGERANT; ENERGY-EFFICIENT; DESIGN OPTIMIZATION; UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION; SENSITIVITY; ENHANCEMENT; MODELS;
D O I
10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2018.12.165
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
To develop a safe and profitable process, uncertainty quantification is necessary for a reliability, availability, and maintainability (RAM) analysis. The uncertainties of 3% in each key decision variables are propagated which could bring the system into an unreliable/risk region. Hence, in this study, uncertainty quantification (UQ) with simultaneous determination of sensitivity indices (SI) is proposed using generalized polynomial chaos (gPC) modeling approach. This approach reduces about 90% of the total computational time when compared with the conventional simulation approaches required for a complex first principle based model. Subsequently, a knowledge inspired reliability analysis is carried out using the uncertainty analysis (UA). By using the statistical properties of the process, for example, mean/optimal value at 50% failure give the bound between [0.7174, 0.9496] for LNG product stream. Further, it was found that LNG with 10% end flash gas (or 90% liquefaction rate) can be obtained with a failure probability of 14.43%. This value of reliability is promising for a given specified deviation; hence, the process could be assumed to be near to its reliable optimal operational region.
引用
收藏
页码:19 / 29
页数:11
相关论文
共 54 条
  • [1] Reliability of complex chemical engineering processes
    Abubakar, Usman
    Sriramula, Srinivas
    Renton, Neill C.
    [J]. COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2015, 74 : 1 - 14
  • [2] On possibilistic and probabilistic uncertainty assessment of power flow problem: A review and a new approach
    Aien, Morteza
    Rashidinejad, Masoud
    Fotuhi-Firuzabad, Mahmud
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2014, 37 : 883 - 895
  • [3] Measuring the reliability of a natural gas refrigeration plant: Uncertainty propagation and quantification with polynomial chaos expansion based sensitivity analysis
    Ali, Wahid
    Pham Luu Trung Duong
    Khan, Mohd Shariq
    Getu, Mesfin
    Lee, Moonyong
    [J]. RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2018, 172 : 103 - 117
  • [4] Energy optimization for single mixed refrigerant natural gas liquefaction process using the metaheuristic vortex search algorithm
    Ali, Wahid
    Qyyum, Muhammad Abdul
    Qadeer, Kinza
    Lee, Moonyong
    [J]. APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2018, 129 : 782 - 791
  • [5] [Anonymous], 1991, STOCHASTIC FINITE EL, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-1-4612-3094-6
  • [6] Babendreier T. B. R. Justin, 2017, GUIDANCE DEV EVALUAT
  • [7] An efficient variable screening method for effective surrogate models for reliability-based design optimization
    Cho, Hyunkyoo
    Bae, Sangjune
    Choi, K. K.
    Lamb, David
    Yang, Ren-Jye
    [J]. STRUCTURAL AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION, 2014, 50 (05) : 717 - 738
  • [8] Model uncertainty
    Clyde, M
    George, EI
    [J]. STATISTICAL SCIENCE, 2004, 19 (01) : 81 - 94
  • [9] Dhanak M. R., 2016, SPRINGER HDB OCEAN E
  • [10] Dieck R.H., 2007, MEASUREMENT UNCERTAI