3D gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography of the carotid arteries

被引:71
|
作者
Cloft, HJ [1 ]
Murphy, KJ [1 ]
Prince, MR [1 ]
Brunberg, JA [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV MICHIGAN,DEPT RADIOL,ANN ARBOR,MI 48109
关键词
arteries; MR; magnetic resonance (MR); flow artifact; contrast enhancement; vascular studies; carotid arteries; stenosis or obstruction;
D O I
10.1016/0730-725X(96)00091-4
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To compare gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) of the carotid bifurcation with 2D time-of-flight (TOF) MR angiography with regard to image quality and duration of examination. Materials and Methods: Gadolinium contrast was administered intravenously during 3D MR imaging at 1.5 Tesla in 46 patients presenting with suspected carotid occlusive disease. 2D time-of-flight MR angiography of the carotid bifurcation had been performed in each patient prior to gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. Results: Gadolinium MRA eliminated slice misregistration and in-plane saturation artifacts that occasionally degrades 2D TOF MR angiography. Gadolinium MRA required less than 4 min to image from the aortic arch to the skull base compared to 11 min for 2D TOF with comparable signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). Postprocessing was required to eliminate overlapping venous enhancement, Both techniques had susceptibility related artifactual loss of signal at the skull base and both demonstrated a linear artifact paralleling the long axis of arteries. Conclusion: Gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography is a promising technique for the evaluation of patients with carotid occlusive disease because it rapidly images the carotid arteries from the aortic arch to the skull base and eliminates some of the artifacts that degrade 2D TOF MR angiography.
引用
收藏
页码:593 / 600
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography of the carotid arteries
    Enochs, WS
    Ackerman, RH
    Kaufman, JA
    Candia, M
    JOURNAL OF NEUROIMAGING, 1998, 8 (04) : 185 - 190
  • [2] Gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography of the carotid arteries: A. small step, a giant leap?
    Rofsky, NM
    Adelman, MA
    RADIOLOGY, 1998, 209 (01) : 31 - 34
  • [3] GADOLINIUM-ENHANCED MAGNITUDE CONTRAST MR ANGIOGRAPHY OF POPLITEAL AND TIBIAL ARTERIES
    LOSSEF, SV
    RAJAN, SS
    PATT, RH
    CARVLIN, M
    CALCAGNO, D
    GOMES, MN
    BARTH, KH
    RADIOLOGY, 1992, 184 (02) : 349 - 355
  • [4] Value of image subtraction in 3D gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography of the renal arteries
    Leung, DA
    Pelkonen, P
    Hany, TF
    Zimmermann, G
    Pfammatter, T
    Debatin, JF
    JMRI-JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 1998, 8 (03): : 598 - 602
  • [5] Intraarterial gadolinium-enhanced 2D and 3D MR angiography: A preliminary study
    Omary, RA
    Frayne, R
    Unal, O
    Grist, TM
    Strother, CM
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 1999, 10 (10) : 1315 - 1321
  • [6] Carotid artery stenosis: Prospective comparison of CT, three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR, and conventional angiography
    Randoux, B
    Marro, B
    Koskas, F
    Duyme, M
    Sahel, M
    Zouaoui, A
    Marsault, C
    RADIOLOGY, 2001, 220 (01) : 179 - 185
  • [7] Gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography of the lower extremity arteries with on automated table-feed technique.
    Lenhart, M
    Djavidani, B
    Völk, M
    Strotzer, M
    Manke, C
    Requardt, M
    Nitz, WR
    Kasprzak, P
    Feuerbach, S
    Link, J
    ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 1999, 171 (06): : 442 - 449
  • [8] GADOLINIUM-ENHANCED MR AORTOGRAPHY
    PRINCE, MR
    RADIOLOGY, 1994, 191 (01) : 155 - 164
  • [9] Hepatic lesions: Morphologic and functional characterization with multiphase breath-hold 3D gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography - Initial results
    Hawighorst, H
    Schoenberg, SO
    Knopp, MV
    Essig, M
    Miltner, P
    van Kaick, G
    RADIOLOGY, 1999, 210 (01) : 89 - 96
  • [10] Test bolus examination in the carotid artery at dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography
    Kim, JK
    Farb, RI
    Wright, GA
    RADIOLOGY, 1998, 206 (01) : 283 - 289