Combining physical and economic output data to analyse energy and CO2 emissions trends in industry

被引:22
作者
Cahill, Caiman J. [1 ,2 ]
Gallachoir, Brian P. O. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Coll Cork, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Sustainable Energy Res Grp, Cork, Ireland
[2] Natl Univ Ireland Univ Coll Cork, Environm Res Inst, Cork, Ireland
关键词
Index decomposition analysis; Energy efficiency indicator; Materialisation; DECOMPOSITION ANALYSIS; DIVISIA INDEX; EFFICIENCY; INTENSITY; INDICATORS; PERFECT; POLICY;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2012.06.041
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Index decomposition analysis based on economic output is frequently employed to provide an indication of energy intensity trends in industry. Additionally, composite energy efficiency indicators, calculated using physical output, are used to give a more accurate view of energy efficiency progress. Both approaches are commonly presented in one study but often with a different mathematical basis for each. This may lead to inconsistent results. We demonstrate using practical case studies that when all physical and economic output data are available for industry sub-sectors, these can be combined in a single decomposition analysis that provides an energy efficiency indicator based on physical production and an indicator of the influence of structural change based on value added. Using the same methodology for both results ensures that the results are consistent and provides insights into the effects of changing prices of goods on aggregate energy intensity. In the case studies examined, falling unit values of industrial goods produced over time tend to increase the energy intensity of industry. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:422 / 429
页数:8
相关论文
共 40 条
[21]  
Central Statistics Office, 2010, CENTR STAT OFF DAT D
[22]   A residual-free decomposition of the sources of carbon dioxide emissions: a case of the Korean industries [J].
Chung, HS ;
Rhee, HC .
ENERGY, 2001, 26 (01) :15-30
[23]  
Dal P., 2009, ENERGY EFFICIENCY PO
[24]  
de Arriba Segurado P., 2009, ENERGY EFFICIENCY PO
[25]   Industrial energy efficiency - Indicators for a European cross-country comparison of energy efficiency in the manufacturing industry [J].
Eichhammer, W ;
Mannsbart, W .
ENERGY POLICY, 1997, 25 (7-9) :759-772
[26]  
Farla J.C.M., 2000, Journal of Industrial Ecology, V4, P93, DOI [10.1162/108819800569203, DOI 10.1162/108819800569203]
[27]   The use of physical indicators for the monitoring of energy intensity developments in the Netherlands, 1980-1995 [J].
Farla, JCM ;
Blok, K .
ENERGY, 2000, 25 (07) :609-638
[28]   Comparison of six decomposition methods: Application to aggregate energy intensity for manufacturing in 10 OECD countries [J].
Greening, LA ;
Davis, WB ;
Schipper, L ;
Khrushch, M .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 1997, 19 (03) :375-390
[29]   Comparing structural and index decomposition analysis [J].
Hoekstra, R ;
van der Bergh, JJCJM .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2003, 25 (01) :39-64
[30]  
International Energy Agency, 2004, 30 YEARS EN US IEA C