Risk and governance in water recycling public acceptance revisited

被引:66
作者
Stenekes, N [1 ]
Colebatch, HK [1 ]
Waite, TD [1 ]
Ashbolt, NJ [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ New S Wales, Sch Civil & Environm Engn, Kensington, NSW 2033, Australia
关键词
water recycling; institutional approach; risk; public acceptance; community engagement;
D O I
10.1177/0162243905283636
中图分类号
D58 [社会生活与社会问题]; C913 [社会生活与社会问题];
学科分类号
摘要
Public acceptance is often seen as a key reason why water-recycling technology is (accepted or) rejected. A common assumption is that projects fail because the general public is unable to comprehend specialist information about risk and the belief that if the public were better informed, they would accept change more readily. This article suggests that rhetoric about acceptance is counterproductive in progressing sustainability as it does not address issues relating to institutional arrangements and reinforces a dichotomy between expert and lay groups. Instead, it is argued that institutional change is needed to build opportunities for constructive public engagement. The failure to implement sustainable water use through recycling can be understood as the result of several factors including present cost structures for water, institutional conservatism, administrative fragmentation, and inadequate involvement of communities in planning. Achieving sustainable water use through recycling may require better coordination between agencies and integrated government policies.
引用
收藏
页码:107 / 134
页数:28
相关论文
共 91 条
  • [1] *ABC, 2004, ABC NEWS ONL
  • [2] *AC TECHN SCI ENG, 2004, WAT REC AUSTR
  • [3] *AG FRANC PRESS, 2003, BORN B
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2 NAT C WAT REC AUST
  • [5] [Anonymous], 1995, I ORG FDN ORG SCI
  • [6] [Anonymous], 1992, GUID WAT REUS
  • [7] [Anonymous], KNOWLEDGE POWER PART
  • [8] *AUSTR BUR STAT, 2002, AUSTR DEM STAT
  • [9] *AUSTR WAT ASS, 2003, SUBM SEN ENQ AUSTR U
  • [10] Beck U., 1986, RISK SOC