Instrumental and Observational Artifacts in Quiet Sun Magnetic Flux Cancellation Functions

被引:1
作者
Pietarila, A. [1 ]
Graham, J. Pietarila [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Natl Solar Observ, Tucson, AZ 85719 USA
[2] Los Alamos Natl Lab MS B258, Solid Mech & Fluid Dynam T 3, Los Alamos, NM 87545 USA
[3] Los Alamos Natl Lab MS B258, Ctr Nonlinear Studies, Los Alamos, NM 87545 USA
关键词
Solar magnetic fields; Photosphere; Quiet Sun; FIELDS; SIMULATIONS; SPECTRUM; MISSION;
D O I
10.1007/s11207-012-0140-4
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
Under the assumption that the photospheric quiet Sun magnetic field is turbulent, the cancellation function has previously been used to estimate the true, resolutionindependent mean, unsigned vertical flux <vertical bar B-z vertical bar >(true). We show that the presence of network elements, noise, and seeing complicate the measurement of accurate cancellation functions and their power law exponents kappa. Failure to exclude network elements previously led to estimates that were too low for both the cancellation exponent kappa and <vertical bar B-z vertical bar >(true). However, both kappa and <vertical bar Bz vertical bar >(true) are overestimated due to noise in magnetograms. While no conclusive value can be derived with data from current instruments, our Hinode/SP results of kappa less than or similar to 0.38 and <vertical bar B-z vertical bar >(true) less than or similar to 270 gauss can be taken as upper bounds.
引用
收藏
页码:389 / 404
页数:16
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   Pre-flare changes in current helicity and turbulent regime of the photospheric magnetic field [J].
Abramenko, V .
MAGNETIC HELICITY AT THE SUN, IN SOLAR WIND AND MAGNETOSPHERES: VISTAS FROM X-RAY OBSERVATORIES, 2003, 32 (10) :1937-1942
[2]   INTERMITTENCY AND MULTIFRACTALITY SPECTRA OF THE MAGNETIC FIELD IN SOLAR ACTIVE REGIONS [J].
Abramenko, Valentyna ;
Yurchyshyn, Vasyl .
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2010, 722 (01) :122-130
[3]   MAGNETIC ENERGY SPECTRA IN SOLAR ACTIVE REGIONS [J].
Abramenko, Valentyna ;
Yurchyshyn, Vasyl .
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2010, 720 (01) :717-722
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1964, Soviet Astronomy
[5]   FRACTAL LEVEL SETS AND MULTIFRACTAL FIELDS IN DIRECT SIMULATIONS OF TURBULENCE [J].
BRANDENBURG, A ;
PROCACCIA, I ;
SEGEL, D ;
VINCENT, A .
PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 1992, 46 (08) :4819-4828
[6]   FLUX TUBES AND SCALING IN MHD DYNAMO SIMULATIONS [J].
BRANDENBURG, A .
CHAOS SOLITONS & FRACTALS, 1995, 5 (10) :2023-&
[7]   MULTIFRACTAL MODELS OF SMALL-SCALE SOLAR MAGNETIC-FIELDS [J].
CADAVID, AC ;
LAWRENCE, JK ;
RUZMAIKIN, AA ;
KAYLENGKNIGHT, A .
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 1994, 429 (01) :391-399
[8]  
Frisch U., 1995, TURBULENCE LEGACY AN, p[136, 185]
[9]   Are Solar Active Regions with Major Flares More Fractal, Multifractal, or Turbulent Than Others? [J].
Georgoulis, Manolis K. .
SOLAR PHYSICS, 2012, 276 (1-2) :161-181
[10]   TOWARD A THEORY OF INTERSTELLAR TURBULENCE .2. STRONG ALFVENIC TURBULENCE [J].
GOLDREICH, P ;
SRIDHAR, S .
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 1995, 438 (02) :763-775