Simulation of nitrate, sulfate, and ammonium aerosols over the United States

被引:104
作者
Walker, J. M. [1 ]
Philip, S. [3 ]
Martin, R. V. [3 ,4 ]
Seinfeld, J. H. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] CALTECH, Dept Environm Sci & Engn, Pasadena, CA 91125 USA
[2] CALTECH, Dept Chem Engn, Pasadena, CA 91125 USA
[3] Dalhousie Univ, Dept Phys & Atmospher Sci, Halifax, NS, Canada
[4] Harvard Smithsonian Ctr Astrophys, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
关键词
TROPOSPHERIC EMISSION SPECTROMETER; DRY DEPOSITION; ATMOSPHERIC AMMONIA; MODEL; NITROGEN; IMPACTS;
D O I
10.5194/acp-12-11213-2012
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Atmospheric concentrations of inorganic gases and aerosols (nitrate, sulfate, and ammonium) are simulated for 2009 over the United States using the chemical transport model GEOS-Chem. Predicted aerosol concentrations are compared with surface-level measurement data from the Interagency Monitoring of Protected Visual Environments (IMPROVE), the Clean Air Status and Trends Network (CASTNET), and the California Air Resources Board (CARB). Sulfate predictions nationwide are in reasonably good agreement with observations, while nitrate and ammonium are over-predicted in the East and Midwest, but under-predicted in California, where observed concentrations are the highest in the country. Over-prediction of nitrate in the East and Midwest is consistent with results of recent studies, which suggest that nighttime nitric acid formation by heterogeneous hydrolysis of N2O5 is over-predicted based on current values of the N2O5 uptake coefficient, gamma, onto aerosols. After reducing the value of gamma by a factor of 10, predicted nitrate levels in the US Midwest and East still remain higher than those measured, and over-prediction of nitrate in this region remains unexplained. Comparison of model predictions with satellite measurements of ammonia from the Tropospheric Emissions Spectrometer (TES) indicates that ammonia emissions in GEOS-Chem are underestimated in California and that the nationwide seasonality applied to ammonia emissions in GEOS-Chem does not represent California very well, particularly underestimating winter emissions. An ammonia sensitivity study indicates that GEOS-Chem simulation of nitrate is ammonia-limited in southern California and much of the state, suggesting that an underestimate of ammonia emissions is likely the main cause for the under-prediction of nitrate aerosol in many areas of California. An approximate doubling of ammonia emissions is needed to reproduce observed nitrate concentrations in southern California and in other ammonia sensitive areas of California. However, even a tenfold increase in ammonia emissions yields predicted nitrate concentrations that are still biased low in the central valley of California. The under-prediction of nitrate aerosol in the central valley of California may arise in part from an under-prediction of both ammonia and nitric acid in this region. Since nitrate aerosols are particularly sensitive to mixed layer depths, owing to the gas-particle equilibrium, the nitrate under-prediction could also arise in part from a potential regional overestimate of GEOS-5 mixed layer depths in the central valley due to unresolved topography in this region.
引用
收藏
页码:11213 / 11227
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Large near-term projected snowpack loss over the western United States
    Fyfe, John C.
    Derksen, Chris
    Mudryk, Lawrence
    Flato, Gregory M.
    Santer, Benjamin D.
    Swart, Neil C.
    Molotch, Noah P.
    Zhang, Xuebin
    Wan, Hui
    Arora, Vivek K.
    Scinocca, John
    Jiao, Yanjun
    NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2017, 8
  • [32] Fine-scale simulation of ammonium and nitrate over the South Coast Air Basin and San Joaquin Valley of California during CalNex-2010
    Kelly, James T.
    Baker, Kirk R.
    Nowak, John B.
    Murphy, Jennifer G.
    Markovic, Milos Z.
    VandenBoer, Trevor C.
    Ellis, Raluca A.
    Neuman, J. Andrew
    Weber, Rodney J.
    Roberts, James M.
    Veres, Patrick R.
    de Gouw, Joost A.
    Beaver, Melinda R.
    Newman, Sally
    Misenis, Chris
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2014, 119 (06) : 3600 - 3614
  • [33] Insights from an Evaluation of Nitrate Load Estimation Methods in the Midwestern United States
    Park, Daeryong
    Um, Myoung-Jin
    Markus, Momcilo
    Jung, Kichul
    Keefer, Laura
    Verma, Siddhartha
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (13)
  • [34] Numerical simulation of the interaction between ammonium nitrate aerosol and convective boundary-layer dynamics
    Barbaro, E.
    Krol, M. C.
    de Arellano, J. Vila-Guerau
    ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2015, 105 : 202 - 211
  • [35] Widespread Pollution From Secondary Sources of Organic Aerosols During Winter in the Northeastern United States
    Shah, Viral
    Jaegle, Lyatt
    Jimenez, Jose L.
    Schroder, Jason C.
    Campuzano-Jost, Pedro
    Campos, Teresa L.
    Reeves, John M.
    Stell, Meghan
    Brown, Steven S.
    Lee, Ben H.
    Lopez-Hilfiker, Felipe D.
    Thornton, Joel A.
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2019, 46 (05) : 2974 - 2983
  • [36] Simulation of particle formation and number concentration over the Eastern United States with the WRF-Chem plus APM model
    Luo, G.
    Yu, F.
    ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2011, 11 (22) : 11521 - 11533
  • [37] Increasing large wildfires over the western United States linked to diminishing sea ice in the Arctic
    Zou, Yufei
    Rasch, Philip J.
    Wang, Hailong
    Xie, Zuowei
    Zhang, Rudong
    NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2021, 12 (01)
  • [38] Subseasonal Clustering of Atmospheric Rivers Over the Western United States
    Slinskey, Emily A.
    Hall, Alex
    Goldenson, Naomi
    Loikith, Paul C.
    Norris, Jesse
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2023, 128 (22)
  • [39] Preconditions for extreme wet winters over the contiguous United States
    Hoell, Andrew
    Hoerling, Martin
    Eischeid, Jon
    Barsugli, Joseph
    WEATHER AND CLIMATE EXTREMES, 2021, 33
  • [40] Projected Changes in Climate Extremes over the Northeastern United States
    Ning, Liang
    Riddle, Emily E.
    Bradley, Raymond S.
    JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2015, 28 (08) : 3289 - 3310