On-line individual differences in statistical learning predict language processing

被引:118
作者
Misyak, Jennifer B. [1 ]
Christiansen, Morten H. [1 ]
Tomblin, J. Bruce [2 ]
机构
[1] Cornell Univ, Dept Psychol, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
[2] Univ Iowa, Dept Commun Sci & Disorders, Iowa City, IA USA
关键词
statistical learning; language processing; individual differences; serial-reaction time; artificial grammar; relative clauses; CAPACITY THEORY; WORKING-MEMORY; IMPLICIT; SEQUENCE; ADJACENT; COMPREHENSION; EXPERIENCE; FREQUENCY; ATTENTION;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00031
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Considerable individual differences in language ability exist among normally developing children and adults. Whereas past research have attributed such differences to variations in verbal working memory or experience with language, we test the hypothesis that individual differences in statistical learning may be associated with differential language performance. We employ a novel paradigm for studying statistical learning on-line, combining a serial-reaction time task with artificial grammar learning. This task offers insights into both the timecourse of and individual differences in statistical learning. Experiment 1 charts the micro-level trajectory for statistical learning of nonadjacent dependencies and provides an on-line index of individual differences therein. In Experiment 2, these differences are then shown to predict variations in participants' on-line processing of long-distance dependencies involving center-embedded relative clauses. The findings suggest that individual differences in the ability to learn from experience through statistical learning may contribute to variations in linguistic performance.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1993, IMPLICIT LEARNING TA
[2]   Segmenting dynamic human action via statistical structure [J].
Baldwin, Dare ;
Andersson, Annika ;
Saffran, Jenny ;
Meyer, Meredith .
COGNITION, 2008, 106 (03) :1382-1407
[3]  
Bates E., 1995, Handbook of child language, P96
[4]   IMPLICIT LEARNING OF A NONVERBAL SEQUENCE IN YOUNGER AND OLDER ADULTS [J].
CHERRY, KE ;
STADLER, MA .
PSYCHOLOGY AND AGING, 1995, 10 (03) :379-394
[5]   Implicit learning: news from the front [J].
Cleeremans, A ;
Destrebecqz, A ;
Boyer, M .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 1998, 2 (10) :406-416
[6]   LEARNING THE STRUCTURE OF EVENT SEQUENCES [J].
CLEEREMANS, A ;
MCCLELLAND, JL .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 1991, 120 (03) :235-253
[7]   ATTENTION AND STRUCTURE IN SEQUENCE LEARNING [J].
COHEN, A ;
IVRY, RI ;
KEELE, SW .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 1990, 16 (01) :17-30
[8]   Implicit statistical learning in language processing: Word predictability is the key [J].
Conway, Christopher M. ;
Bauernschmidt, Althea ;
Huang, Sean S. ;
Pisoni, David B. .
COGNITION, 2010, 114 (03) :356-371
[9]   Can sequence learning be implicit? New evidence with the process dissociation procedure [J].
Destrebecqz, A ;
Cleeremans, A .
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2001, 8 (02) :343-350
[10]   CORRELATIONAL ANALYSES OF PROCEDURAL AND DECLARATIVE LEARNING-PERFORMANCE [J].
FELDMAN, J ;
KERR, B ;
STREISSGUTH, AP .
INTELLIGENCE, 1995, 20 (01) :87-114