Tumor Progression After Preoperative Portal Vein Embolization

被引:124
作者
Hoekstra, Lisette T. [1 ]
van Lienden, Krijn P. [2 ]
Doets, Ageeth [1 ]
Busch, Olivier R. C. [1 ]
Gouma, Dirk J. [1 ]
van Gulik, Thomas M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Surg, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Tumor growth rate; liver resection; portal vein embolization (PVE); remnant liver; COLORECTAL LIVER METASTASES; GROWTH-RATE; HEPATOCELLULAR-CARCINOMA; MAJOR HEPATECTOMY; ARTERIAL CHEMOEMBOLIZATION; REGENERATION; CHEMOTHERAPY; RESECTION; RESECTABILITY; BEVACIZUMAB;
D O I
10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182733f09
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To evaluate tumor growth in a series of patients undergoing liver resection after portal vein embolization (PVE). Background: The regenerative response after PVE leading to compensatory hypertrophy of the nonembolized liver segments potentially enhances tumor growth. Methods: Portal vein embolization was performed in 28 patients diagnosed with colorectal metastases between 2004 and 2011. Tumor volume was measured by computed tomography (CT) volumetry before and after PVE. Tumor growth rate (TGR) was measured by CT volumetry and compared with that of a non-PVE control group with colorectal metastases of whom 30 had 2 CT scans preoperatively. Also, newly diagnosed tumors in the future remnant liver (FRL) after PVE and after resection were analyzed. Results: The median TGR of PVE patients was 0.53 mL/d (interquartile range [IQR], 0.02-1.88) versus 0.09 mL/d (IQR, -0.04 to 0.40; P = 0.03) in non-PVE patients. The TGR was 0.15 (IQR, -0.52 to 0.66) mL/d before PVE and 0.85 (IQR, -0.10 to 1.62) mL/d after PVE in the same patients (P = 0.03). Seven patients (25%) showed new tumor lesions in the FRL after PVE, of whom 3 patients (11%) were not resectable. Patients (8 of 19; 42%) after PVE also showed a higher rate of recurrent metastases in the remnant liver at follow-up than non-PVE patients (1 of 28; 4%). Survival was significantly better for non-PVE patients, with a 3-year survival rate of 77% versus 26% in patients undergoing PVE. Conclusions: Portal vein embolization is associated with increased TGR and new tumor in the FRL and recurrent tumor after resection. Short intervals and interval chemotherapy between PVE and resection are, therefore, advised.
引用
收藏
页码:812 / 818
页数:7
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Portal Vein Embolization (Prior to Major Hepatectomy) Effects on Regeneration, Resectability, and Outcome
    Abdalla, Eddie K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2010, 102 (08) : 960 - 967
  • [2] Resection of nonresectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer after percutaneous portal vein embolization
    Azoulay, D
    Castaing, D
    Smail, A
    Adam, R
    Cailliez, V
    Laurent, A
    Lemoine, A
    Bismuth, H
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2000, 231 (04) : 480 - 486
  • [3] Preoperative right portal vein embolization in patients with metastatic liver disease - Metastatic liver volumes after RPVE
    Barbaro, B
    Stasi, CD
    Nuzzo, G
    Vellone, M
    Giuliante, F
    Marano, P
    [J]. ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2003, 44 (01) : 98 - 102
  • [4] Portal vein embolisation prior to hepatic resection for colorectal liver metastases and the effects of periprocedure chemotherapy
    Beal, I. K.
    Anthony, S.
    Papadopoulou, A.
    Hutchins, R.
    Fusai, G.
    Begent, R.
    Davies, N.
    Tibballs, J.
    Davidson, B.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2006, 79 (942) : 473 - 478
  • [5] Systemic chemotherapy and two-stage hepatectomy for extensive bilateral colorectal liver metastases: Perioperative safety and survival
    Chun, Yun Shin
    Vauthey, Jean-Nicolas
    Ribero, Dario
    Donadon, Matteo
    Mullen, John T.
    Eng, Cathy
    Madoff, David C.
    Chang, David Z.
    Ho, Linus
    Kopetz, Scott
    Wei, Steven H.
    Curley, Steven A.
    Abdalla, Eddie K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2007, 11 (11) : 1498 - 1504
  • [6] Lack of evidence for increased operative morbidity after hepatectomy with perioperative use of bevacizumab: A matched case-control study
    D'Angelica, Michael
    Kornprat, Peter
    Gonen, Mithat
    Chung, Ki-Young
    Jarnagin, William R.
    DeMatteo, Ronald P.
    Fong, Yuman
    Kemeny, Nancy
    Blumgart, Leslie H.
    Saltz, Leonard B.
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 14 (02) : 759 - 765
  • [7] Increase in future remnant liver function after preoperative portal vein embolization
    de Graaf, W.
    van Lienden, K. P.
    van den Esschert, J. W.
    Bennink, R. J.
    van Gulik, T. M.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2011, 98 (06) : 825 - 834
  • [8] Induction of Tumor Growth After Preoperative Portal Vein Embolization: Is It a Real Problem?
    de Graaf, Wilmar
    van den Esschert, Jacomina W.
    van Lienden, Krijn P.
    van Gulik, Thomas M.
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 16 (02) : 423 - 430
  • [9] During liver regeneration following right portal embolization the growth rate of liver metastases is more rapid than that of the liver parenchyma
    Elias, D
    de Baere, T
    Roche, A
    Ducreux, M
    Leclere, J
    Lasser, P
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1999, 86 (06) : 784 - 788
  • [10] Portal vein embolization before right hepatectomy - Prospective clinical trial
    Farges, O
    Belghiti, J
    Kianmanesh, R
    Regimbeau, JM
    Santoro, R
    Vilgrain, V
    Denys, A
    Sauvanet, A
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2003, 237 (02) : 208 - 217