Bioremediation of hydrocarbon contaminated soil using local organic materials and earthworms

被引:12
作者
Nobili, Sofia [1 ]
Masin, Carolina Elisabet [1 ,2 ]
Zalazar, Cristina Susana [1 ]
Lescano, Maia Raquel [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] UNL CONICET, Inst Desarrollo Tecnol Ind Quim INTEC, Santa Fe, Argentina
[2] Univ Catolica Santa Fe UCSF, Fac Ciencias Salud, Santa Fe, Argentina
[3] Predio CONICET Santa Fe Dr Alberto Cassanoo, Inst Desarrollo Tecnol Ind Quim, Ruta Nacl 168, Km 0 Paraje El Pozo, RA-3000 Santa Fe, Argentina
关键词
Total petroleum hydrocarbons; Earthworms; Soil contamination; Bioremediation; EISENIA-FOETIDA; PETROLEUM-HYDROCARBONS; DIESEL FUEL; COMPOST; REMEDIATION; OIL; VERMICOMPOST; PHYTOREMEDIATION; DEGRADATION; METABOLITES;
D O I
10.1016/j.envpol.2022.120169
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Bioremediation technologies have demonstrated significant success on biological quality recovery of hydrocar-bon contaminated soils, employing techniques among which composting and vermiremediation stand out. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficiency of these processes to remediate diesel-contaminated soil, employing local organic materials and earthworms. During the initial composting stage (75 days), the substrate was made up using contaminated soil, lombricompost, rice hulls and wheat stubbles (60:20:15:5% w/w). Diesel concentration in the contaminated substrate was about 5 g kg -1, equivalent to a Total Petroleum Hidrocarbons (TPH) experimental concentration of 3425 & PLUSMN; 50 mg kg -1. During the later vermiremediation stage (60 days), the earthworm species Eisenia fetida and Amynthas morrisi were evaluated for their hydrocarbon degradation ca-pacity. Physicochemical and biological assays were measured at different times of each stage and ecotoxicity assays were performed at the end of the experiments. TPH concentration reduced 10.91% after composting and from 45.2 to 60.81% in the different treatments after vermiremediation. Compared with TPH degradation in the treatment without earthworms (16.05%), results indicate that earthworms, along with indigenous microorgan-isms, accelerate the remediation process. Vermiremediation treatments did not present phytotoxicity and re-flected high substrate maturity values (> 80% Germination Index) although toxic effects were observed due to E. fetida and A morrisi exposure to diesel. Vermiremediation was an efficient technology for the recovery of substrate biological quality after diesel contamination in a short period. The addition of organic materials and suitable food sources aided earthworm subsistence, promoted the decontamination process and improved the substrate quality for future productive applications.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 65 条
[1]   National inventory of organic wastes for use as growing media for ornamental potted plant production:: case study in Spain [J].
Abad, M ;
Noguera, P ;
Burés, S .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2001, 77 (02) :197-200
[2]   Bioremediation of diesel and gasoline-contaminated soil by covermicomposting amended with activated sludge: Diesel and gasoline degradation and kinetics [J].
Abdollahinejad, Behnaz ;
Pasalari, Hasan ;
Jafari, Ahmad Jonidi ;
Esrafili, Ali ;
Farzadkia, Mahdi .
ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 2020, 263
[3]   Influence of diesel fuel on seed germination [J].
Adam, G ;
Duncan, H .
ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 2002, 120 (02) :363-370
[4]  
Aemere O., 2012, J ENV ANAL TOXICOL, V2, P159, DOI [10.4172/2161-0525.1000159, DOI 10.4172/2161-0525.1000159]
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2011, GREEN GROWTH STUD EN
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2005, SOIL QUAL AV TEST 1
[7]   Phytotoxicity of three plant-based biodiesels, unmodified castor oil, and Diesel fuel to alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.), lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.), radish (Raphanus sativus), and wheatgrass (Triticum aestivum) [J].
Bamgbose, Ifeoluwa ;
Anderson, Todd A. .
ECOTOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY, 2015, 122 :268-274
[8]  
Barrios San Martín Yaima, 2011, Biotecnol Apl, V28, P69
[9]  
Bidoia E., 2018, METHODS PHARM TOXICO, DOI [10.1007/978-1-4939-7425-2, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-7425-2]
[10]  
BREMNER J. M., 1960, JOUR AGRIC SCI, V55, P11, DOI 10.1017/S0021859600021572