The appendicitis inflammatory response score: A tool for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis that outperforms the Alvarado score

被引:251
作者
Andersson, Manne [1 ]
Andersson, Roland E. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Cty Hosp Ryhov, Dept Surg, S-55185 Jonkoping, Sweden
[2] Univ Hosp, Dept Surg, S-58185 Linkoping, Sweden
关键词
D O I
10.1007/s00268-008-9649-y
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background The clinical diagnosis of appendicitis is a subjective synthesis of information from variables with ill-defined diagnostic value. This process could be improved by using a scoring system that includes objective variables that reflect the inflammatory response. This study describes the construction and evaluation of a new clinical appendicitis score. Methods Data were collected prospectively from 545 patients admitted for suspected appendicitis at four hospitals. The score was constructed from eight variables with independent diagnostic value (right-lower-quadrant pain, rebound tenderness, muscular defense, WBC count, proportion neutrophils, CRP, body temperature, and vomiting) in 316 randomly selected patients and evaluated on the remaining 229 patients. Ordered logistic regression was used to obtain a high discriminating power with focus on advanced appendicitis. Diagnostic performance was compared with the Alvarado score. Results The ROC area of the new score was 0.97 for advanced appendicitis and 0.93 for all appendicitis compared with 0.92 (p = 0.0027) and 0.88 (p = 0.0007), respectively, for the Alvarado score. Sixty-three percent of the patients were classified into the low- or high-probability group with an accuracy of 97.2%, leaving 37% for further investigation. Seventy-three percent of the nonappendicitis patients, 67% of the advanced appendicitis, and 37% of all appendicitis patients were correctly classified into the low- and high-probability zone, respectively. Conclusion This simple clinical score can correctly classify the majority of patients with suspected appendicitis, leaving the need for diagnostic imaging or diagnostic laparoscopy to the smaller group of patients with an indeterminate scoring result.
引用
收藏
页码:1843 / 1849
页数:7
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   A PRACTICAL SCORE FOR THE EARLY DIAGNOSIS OF ACUTE APPENDICITIS [J].
ALVARADO, A .
ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1986, 15 (05) :557-564
[2]   INDICATIONS FOR OPERATION IN SUSPECTED APPENDICITIS AND INCIDENCE OF PERFORATION [J].
ANDERSSON, R ;
HUGANDER, A ;
THULIN, A ;
NYSTROM, PO ;
OLAISON, G .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1994, 308 (6921) :107-110
[3]   Diagnostic value of disease history, clinical presentation, and inflammatory parameters of appendicitis [J].
Andersson, RE ;
Hugander, AP ;
Ghazi, SH ;
Ravn, H ;
Offenbartl, SK ;
Nyström, PO ;
Olaison, GP .
WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1999, 23 (02) :133-140
[4]   Repeated clinical and laboratory examinations in patients with an equivocal diagnosis of appendicitis [J].
Andersson, RE ;
Hugander, A ;
Ravn, H ;
Offenbartl, K ;
Ghazi, SH ;
Nyström, PO ;
Olaison, G .
WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2000, 24 (04) :479-485
[5]   Meta-analysis of the clinical and laboratory diagnosis of appendicitis [J].
Andersson, REB .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2004, 91 (01) :28-37
[6]   Resolving appendicitis is common: Further evidence [J].
Andersson, Roland E. .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2008, 247 (03) :553-553
[7]   The natural history and traditional management of appendicitis revisited: Spontaneous resolution and predominance of prehospital perforations imply that a correct diagnosis is more important than an early diagnosis [J].
Andersson, Roland E. .
WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2007, 31 (01) :86-92
[8]   Acute appendicitis: the continuing role for active observation [J].
Bachoo, P ;
Mahomed, AA ;
Ninan, GK ;
Youngson, GG .
PEDIATRIC SURGERY INTERNATIONAL, 2001, 17 (2-3) :125-128
[9]   THE INADEQUACY OF BINARY MODELS FOR THE CLINICAL REALITY OF 3-ZONE DIAGNOSTIC DECISIONS [J].
FEINSTEIN, AR .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1990, 43 (01) :109-113
[10]   PROBABILITY OF APPENDICITIS BEFORE AND AFTER OBSERVATION [J].
GRAFF, L ;
RADFORD, MJ ;
WERNE, C .
ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1991, 20 (05) :503-507