EMCS-SVR: Hybrid efficient and accurate enhanced simulation approach coupled with adaptive SVR for structural reliability analysis

被引:79
作者
Luo, Changqi [1 ]
Keshtegar, Behrooz [2 ]
Zhu, Shun-Peng [1 ,3 ]
Niu, Xiaopeng [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Elect Sci & Technol China, Sch Mech & Elect Engn, Chengdu 611731, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Zabol, Fac Engn, Dept Civil Engn, PB 9861335856, Zabol, Iran
[3] UESTC Guangdong, Inst Elect & Informat Engn, Dongguan 523808, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Hybrid enhanced sampling methods; Uniform sampling approach; Structural reliability analysis; Support vector regression; Dynamical adaptive strategy; RESPONSE-SURFACE METHOD; PROBABILITY; APPROXIMATE; FAILURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.cma.2022.115499
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
In structural reliability analysis, robust and efficient sampling methods that address low failure probabilities are vital challenges. In this paper, a novel dynamical adaptive enhanced simulation method coupled with support vector regression (SVR) is proposed. Firstly, a more general and efficient approximation formula is proposed as an improved scheme. Furthermore, a dynamical adaptive simulation strategy for Monte Carlo simulation and an active training methodology basis SVR are developed. The dynamical active region for improving the efficiency and robustness of structural reliability analysis is applied for training the SVR models which are utilized for accurate estimating the failure probability by simulation methods. Analytical methods and crude Monte Carlo simulation are used for comparison, validation and discussion with the proposed hybrid simulation method using four numerical examples and four engineering problems. Through coupling SVR with dynamical active region, an accurate failure probability prediction with robust and low-computational cost is achieved. The proposed adaptive strategy applied in hybrid enhanced simulation approaches provided the accurate results with low-computational burden and these hybrid methods are robust than the analytical approaches. The proposed methods have shown strong capability for application in engineering problems with complex nonlinear performance functions. (c) 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:29
相关论文
共 66 条
  • [11] Structural reliability analysis for implicit performance functions using artificial neural network
    Deng, J
    Gu, DS
    Li, XB
    Yue, ZQ
    [J]. STRUCTURAL SAFETY, 2005, 27 (01) : 25 - 48
  • [12] Du X., 2005, Probabilistic Engineering Design, First Order and Second Reliability Methods, P1
  • [13] Saddlepoint approximation for sequential optimization and reliability analysis
    Du, Xiaoping
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN, 2008, 130 (01)
  • [14] Structural reliability assessment based on particles swarm optimization
    Elegbede, C
    [J]. STRUCTURAL SAFETY, 2005, 27 (02) : 171 - 186
  • [15] Elvira V., 2021, WILEY STATSREF STAT, P1, DOI DOI 10.1002/9781118445112.STAT08284
  • [16] A CRITICAL PLANE APPROACH TO MULTIAXIAL FATIGUE DAMAGE INCLUDING OUT-OF-PHASE LOADING
    FATEMI, A
    SOCIE, DF
    [J]. FATIGUE & FRACTURE OF ENGINEERING MATERIALS & STRUCTURES, 1988, 11 (03) : 149 - 165
  • [17] First order control variates algorithm for reliability analysis of engineering structures
    Ghalehnovi, Mansour
    Rashki, Mohsen
    Ameryan, Ala
    [J]. APPLIED MATHEMATICAL MODELLING, 2020, 77 : 829 - 847
  • [18] A robust iterative algorithm for structural reliability analysis
    Gong, Jin-Xin
    Yi, Ping
    [J]. STRUCTURAL AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION, 2011, 43 (04) : 519 - 527
  • [19] Hybrid support vector regression and crow search algorithm for modeling and multiobjective optimization of microalgae-based wastewater treatment
    Hossain, S. M. Zakir
    Sultana, Nahid
    Mohammed, M. Ezzudin
    Razzak, Shaikh A.
    Hossain, Mohammad M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2022, 301
  • [20] Second-order reliability methods: a review and comparative study
    Hu, Zhangli
    Mansour, Rami
    Olsson, Marten
    Du, Xiaoping
    [J]. STRUCTURAL AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION, 2021, 64 (06) : 3233 - 3263