The Auckland Optotypes: An open-access pictogram set for measuring recognition acuity

被引:17
作者
Hamm, Lisa M. [1 ,2 ]
Yeoman, Janice P. [1 ,2 ]
Anstice, Nicola [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Dakin, Steven C. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Auckland, Sch Optometry & Vis Sci, Auckland, New Zealand
[2] Univ Auckland, New Zealand Natl Eye Ctr, Auckland, New Zealand
[3] Univ Canberra, Optometry & Vis Sci, Canberra, ACT, Australia
[4] UCL, UCL Inst Ophthalmol, London, England
来源
JOURNAL OF VISION | 2018年 / 18卷 / 03期
关键词
acuity; optotypes; recognition; children's vision; TEST-RETEST VARIABILITY; VISUAL-ACUITY; LEA SYMBOLS; LETTER-CHART; DIABETIC-RETINOPATHY; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; VANISHING OPTOTYPES; TERMINATION RULES; TESTING PROTOCOL; OPTICAL DEFOCUS;
D O I
10.1167/18.3.13
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
When measuring recognition acuity in a research setting, the most widely used symbols are the Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) set of 10 Sloan letters. However, the symbols are not appropriate for patients unfamiliar with letters, and acuity for individual letters is variable. Alternative pictogram sets are available, but are generally comprised of fewer items. We set out to develop an open-access set of 10 pictograms that would elicit more consistent estimates of acuity across items than the ETDRS letters from visually normal adults. We measured monocular acuity for individual uncrowded optotypes within a newly designed set (The Auckland Optotype [TAO]), the ETDRS set, and Landolt Cs. Eleven visually normal adults were assessed on regular and vanishing formats of each set. Inter-optotype reliability and ability to detect subtle differences between participants were assessed using intraclass correlations (ICC) and fractional rank precision (FRP). The TAO vanishing set showed the strongest performance (ICC = 0.97, FRP = 0.90), followed by the other vanishing sets (Sloan ICC = 0.88, FRP = 0.74; Landolt ICC = 0.86, FRP = 0.80). Within the regular format, TAO again outperformed the existing sets (TAO ICC = 0.77, FRP = 0.75; Sloan ICC = 0.65, FRP = 0.64; Landolt ICC = 0.48, FRP = 0.63). For adults with normal visual acuity, the new optotypes (in both regular and vanishing formats) are more equally legible and sensitive to subtle individual differences than their Sloan counterparts. As this set does not require observers to be able to name Roman letters, and is freely available to use and modify, it may have wide application for measurement of acuity.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 63 条
  • [1] THE CARDIFF TEST - A NEW VISUAL-ACUITY TEST FOR TODDLERS AND CHILDREN WITH INTELLECTUAL IMPAIRMENT - A PRELIMINARY-REPORT
    ADOH, TO
    WOODHOUSE, JM
    ODUWAIYE, KA
    [J]. OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE, 1992, 69 (06) : 427 - 432
  • [2] Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity for individual Sloan letters
    Alexander, KR
    Xie, W
    Derlacki, DJ
    [J]. VISION RESEARCH, 1997, 37 (06) : 813 - 819
  • [3] Do picture- based charts overestimate visual acuity? Comparison of Kay Pictures, Lea Symbols, HOTV and Keeler logMAR charts with Sloan letters in adults and children
    Anstice, Nicola S.
    Jacobs, Robert J.
    Simkin, Samantha K.
    Thomson, Melissa
    Thompson, Benjamin
    Collins, Andrew V.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (02):
  • [4] The measurement of visual acuity in children: an evidence-based update
    Anstice, Nicola S.
    Thompson, Benjamin
    [J]. CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPTOMETRY, 2014, 97 (01) : 3 - 11
  • [5] ARDITI A, 1993, INVEST OPHTH VIS SCI, V34, P120
  • [6] Visual acuity testing. From the laboratory to the clinic
    Bailey, Ian L.
    Lovie-Kitchin, Jan E.
    [J]. VISION RESEARCH, 2013, 90 : 2 - 9
  • [7] BAILEY IL, 1976, AM J OPTOM PHYS OPT, V53, P740
  • [8] A computerized method of visual acuity testing: Adaptation of the early treatment of diabetic retinopathy study testing protocol
    Beck, RW
    Moke, PS
    Turpin, AH
    Ferris, FL
    Sangiovanni, JP
    Johnson, CA
    Birch, EE
    Chandler, DL
    Cox, TA
    Blair, RC
    Kraker, RT
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2003, 135 (02) : 194 - 205
  • [9] Bennett A G, 1965, Br J Physiol Opt, V22, P238
  • [10] The psychophysics toolbox
    Brainard, DH
    [J]. SPATIAL VISION, 1997, 10 (04): : 433 - 436