Treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis with epidural steroid injections: A retrospective outcome study

被引:83
作者
Delport, EG
Cucuzzella, AR
Marley, JK
Pruitt, CM
Fisher, JR
机构
[1] Christiana Spine Center, Newark, DE
[2] Newark, DE 19713
来源
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION | 2004年 / 85卷 / 03期
关键词
epidural injections; fluoroscopy; rehabilitation; spinal stenosis; steroids; treatment outcome;
D O I
10.1016/S0003-9993(03)00472-6
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Objective: To determine patient satisfaction, relief of pain, frequency of injections, change of function, and subsequent surgical rate in patients who received epidural steroid injections (ESIs) for the diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). Design: Retrospective review conducted using a standard set of questions asked over the telephone, 6 to 36 months after the patient received an ESI. Setting: An outpatient spine center. Participants: One hundred forty patients at or over the age of 55 years diagnosed with LSS who received ESI(s). Intervention: Transforaminal or caudal fluoroscopically guided ESIs with 60 to 100mg of triamcinalone in combination with local anesthetic or normal saline. Main Outcome Measures: Duration and amount of pain relief, change in functional status, patient satisfaction, and surgical rate, assessed by a 5-item questionnaire. Results: Of the 140 participants, 32% reported more than 2 months of pain relief, 39% reported less than 2 months of pain relief, and 29% reported no relief from the injection(s). Twenty percent subsequently had surgery. Fifty-three percent reported improvement in their functional abilities. Seventy-four percent where at least somewhat satisfied with ESI as a form of treatment. Conclusions: ESI is a reasonable treatment for LSS, providing one third of our patient population with sustained relief and more than half with sustained improvement in function.
引用
收藏
页码:479 / 484
页数:6
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
Agresti A., 1984, Analysis of Ordinal Categorical Data
[2]  
Agresti A., 1990, Analysis of categorical data
[3]   Lumbar spinal stenosis:: Conservative or surgical management?: A prospective 10-year study [J].
Amundsen, T ;
Weber, H ;
Nordal, HJ ;
Magnaes, B ;
Abdelnoor, M ;
Lilleås, F .
SPINE, 2000, 25 (11) :1424-1435
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1976, ADV PAIN RES THERAPY
[5]   The Maine Lumbar Spine Study .3. 1-year outcomes of surgical and nonsurgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis [J].
Atlas, SJ ;
Deyo, RA ;
Keller, RB ;
Chapin, AM ;
Patrick, DL ;
Long, JM ;
Singer, DE .
SPINE, 1996, 21 (15) :1787-1794
[6]   Surgical and nonsurgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis - Four-year outcomes from the Maine lumbar spine study [J].
Atlas, SJ ;
Keller, RB ;
Robson, D ;
Deyo, RA ;
Singer, DE .
SPINE, 2000, 25 (05) :556-562
[7]  
Beliveau P, 1971, Rheumatol Phys Med, V11, P40, DOI 10.1093/rheumatology/11.1.40
[8]   A CONTROLLED-STUDY OF CAUDAL EPIDURAL INJECTIONS OF TRIAMCINOLONE PLUS PROCAINE FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF INTRACTABLE SCIATICA [J].
BUSH, K ;
HILLIER, S .
SPINE, 1991, 16 (05) :572-575
[9]   CAUDAL EPIDURAL BLOCKS FOR ELDERLY PATIENTS WITH LUMBAR CANAL STENOSIS [J].
CIOCON, JO ;
GALINDOCIOCON, D ;
AMARANATH, L ;
GALINDO, D .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 1994, 42 (06) :593-596
[10]   THE USE OF EPIDURAL STEROIDS IN THE TREATMENT OF LUMBAR RADICULAR PAIN - A PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND-STUDY [J].
CUCKLER, JM ;
BERNINI, PA ;
WIESEL, SW ;
BOOTH, RE ;
ROTHMAN, RH ;
PICKENS, GT .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1985, 67A (01) :63-66