Prejudices, memories, expectations and confidence influence experienced accessibility on the Web

被引:28
作者
Aizpurua, Amaia [1 ,2 ]
Arrue, Myriam [1 ]
Vigo, Markel [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Basque Country, Sch Comp Sci, UPV EHU, Donostia San Sebastian, Spain
[2] Univ Manchester, Sch Comp Sci, Manchester, Lancs, England
关键词
Behavioral sciences; Blind users; Screen readers; Web; Web accessibility; User experience; VISUALLY DISABLED USERS;
D O I
10.1016/j.chb.2015.04.035
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Evidence suggests that compliance with accessibility standards does not always guarantee a satisfying user experience on the Web. The literature indicates that addressing the expectations users have about online content and functionalities is crucial to bridge this gap. We examine the role played by subjectiveness, experience and, particularly, expectations on how users experience the accessibility on the Web. To do so, 11 blind participants were enquired through interviews and questionnaires about 12 tasks they completed in four websites. Thematic analysis on the transcriptions reveals that expectations are often built up on previous experiences and preconceived ideas. Particularly, the content which is explicitly labelled as accessible arises the curiosity and creates high expectations about the accessibility of the website. We also find that, in addition to unmet expectations, prejudices on branding issues and the memories evoked by past experiences or emotional bonds does not only affect the way in which users perceive and experience accessibility, but also the overall user experience. Identifying the nature of expectations is key (i) to formalise more exhaustive user testing protocols and (ii) to complement and complete existing accessibility guidelines. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:152 / 160
页数:9
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] The use of guidelines to automatically verify web accessibility
    Abascal J.
    Arrue M.
    Fajardo I.
    Garay N.
    Tomás J.
    [J]. Universal Access in the Information Society, 2004, 3 (1) : 71 - 79
  • [2] Adams A, 2008, RESEARCH METHODS FOR HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION, P138
  • [3] Aizpurua Amaia, 2013, P 15 INT ACM SIGACCE
  • [4] [Anonymous], 1999, WEB CONTENT ACCESSIB
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2007, P 2007 INT CROSS DIS, DOI DOI 10.1145/1243441.1243465
  • [6] [Anonymous], 1998, 924111 ISO
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2010, P 2010 INT CROSS DIS, DOI DOI 10.1145/1805986.1806019
  • [8] Bargas-Avila JA, 2011, 29TH ANNUAL CHI CONFERENCE ON HUMAN FACTORS IN COMPUTING SYSTEMS, P2689
  • [9] Brajnik G, 2006, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V4061, P156
  • [10] Braun V., 2006, QUAL RES PSYCHOL, V3, P77, DOI [DOI 10.1191/1478088706QP063OA, 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa]