Bone Microstrain Values of 1-Piece and 2-Piece Implants Subjected to Mechanical Loading

被引:7
作者
Harel, Noga [1 ]
Eshkol-Yogev, Inbar [1 ]
Piek, Dana [1 ]
Livne, Shiri [1 ]
Lavi, David [1 ]
Ormianer, Zeev [1 ]
机构
[1] Tel Aviv Univ, Dept Oral Rehabil, Maurice & Gabriela Goldschleger Sch Dent Med, IL-69978 Tel Aviv, Israel
关键词
bone; microstrain 1-piece implant; FINITE-ELEMENT-ANALYSIS; ORAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; BIOMECHANICAL CONSIDERATIONS; PROSPECTIVE MULTICENTER; STRESS-DISTRIBUTION; FORCE TRANSMISSION; TITANIUM IMPLANTS; NATURAL TEETH; FOLLOW-UP;
D O I
10.1097/ID.0b013e3182926199
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to measure and compare the strain levels in peri-implant bone as generated by 1-piece (1P) and 2-piece (2P) implant systems. Materials and Methods: The implants (1P and 2P) were placed into bovine bone according to the manufacturer's protocol. Four linear strain gauges were placed around each implant neck and apex. Each model was loaded in static loading by a material testing machine in ascending forces ranging from 20 to 120 N. Microstrains (mu epsilon) generated in the surrounding bone were measured by a strain gauge and recorded. Results: Recorded microstrains were significantly higher for 1P implants than for 2P implants. Average recorded microstrain values were significantly lower in the neck (71.6 and 17.3 mu s) compared with the apical (132 and 60 mu s) regions of 1P and 2P implants, respectively (P < 0.0001). Conclusions: Within the limitations of this study, highest microstrains were generated in apical regions regardless of implant design, but the 2P implant appeared to provide a stress-damping effect in both the cervical and apical regions compared with the 1P implant.
引用
收藏
页码:277 / 281
页数:5
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [1] The effect of thread pattern upon implant osseointegration
    Abuhussein, Heba
    Pagni, Giorgio
    Rebaudi, Alberto
    Wang, Hom-Lay
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2010, 21 (02) : 129 - 136
  • [2] Akça K, 2002, INT J PROSTHODONT, V15, P115
  • [3] Akça K, 2008, INT J PERIODONT REST, V28, P391
  • [4] Akça K, 2007, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V22, P101
  • [5] OSSEOINTEGRATED TITANIUM IMPLANTS - REQUIREMENTS FOR ENSURING A LONG-LASTING, DIRECT BONE-TO-IMPLANT ANCHORAGE IN MAN
    ALBREKTSSON, T
    BRANEMARK, PI
    HANSSON, HA
    LINDSTROM, J
    [J]. ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA SCANDINAVICA, 1981, 52 (02): : 155 - 170
  • [6] THE INFLUENCE OF IMPLANT DIAMETER AND LENGTH ON STRESS DISTRIBUTION OF OSSEOINTEGRATED IMPLANTS RELATED TO CRESTAL BONE GEOMETRY: A THREE-DIMENSIONAL FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS
    Baggi, Luigi
    Cappelloni, Ilaria
    Di Girolamo, Michele
    Maceri, Franco
    Vairo, Giuseppe
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2008, 100 (06) : 422 - 431
  • [7] Bernardes SR, 2009, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V24, P781
  • [8] Binon PP, 2000, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V15, P76
  • [9] Evaluation of load transfer characteristics of five different implants in compact bone at different load levels by finite elements analysis
    Bozkaya, D
    Muftu, S
    Muftu, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2004, 92 (06) : 523 - 530
  • [10] Brunski J B, 1988, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, V3, P85