Efficacy and Safety of Bevacizumab for the Treatment of Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review of Phase II Trials

被引:85
作者
Fang, Ping [1 ]
Hu, Jin-hua [2 ]
Cheng, Zhi-gang [3 ]
Liu, Zhe-feng [1 ]
Wang, Jin-liang [1 ]
Jiao, Shun-chang [1 ]
机构
[1] Peoples Liberat Army Gen Hosp, Inst Canc, Dept Oncol, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Shandong Prov Hosp, Dept Digest, Jinan, Peoples R China
[3] Peoples Liberat Army Gen Hosp, Inst Canc, Dept Ultrasound Intervent, Beijing, Peoples R China
来源
PLOS ONE | 2012年 / 7卷 / 12期
关键词
PLUS ERLOTINIB; THERAPY; CANCER; COMBINATION; CHEMOTHERAPY; PERSPECTIVES; CHALLENGES; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0049717
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a common cancer associated with a poor prognosis. Bevacizumab is a monoclonal antibody that binds vascular endothelial growth factor, a mediator of tumor angiogenesis. Bevacizumab is currently under investigation as treatment for HCC. We performed a systematic review of the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab for the treatment of advanced HCC. Methods: PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar were searched using the terms "bevacizumab AND hepatocellular carcinoma AND (advanced OR unresectable)". Phase II trials of bevacizumab for the treatment of advanced HCC were included. Outcomes of interest included progression-free and overall survival (PFS and OS), tumor response, and toxicities. Results: A total of 26 records were identified. Of these, 18 were excluded. Hence, eight trials involving 300 patients were included. Bevacizumab was given as monotherapy (n = 1 trial) or in combination with erlotinib (n = 4 trials), capecitabine (n = 1 trial), capecitabine+oxaliplatin (n = 1 trial), or gemcitabine+oxaliplatin (n = 1 trial). Most trials (five of eight) reported median PFS and OS between 5.3 months and 9.0 months and 5.9 and 13.7 months, respectively. The disease control rate was consistent in five of eight trials, ranging from 51.1% to 76.9%. The response and partial response rates ranged from 0 to 23.7%, but were around 20% in four trials. Only one patient had a complete response. Frequently reported Grade 3/4 toxicities were increased aspartate transaminase/alanine transaminase (13%), fatigue (12%), hypertension (10%), diarrhea (8%), and neutropenia (5%). Thirty patients experienced gastrointestinal bleeding (grade 1/2 = 18, grade 3/4 = 12), typically due to esophageal varices. Conclusions: Bevacizumab shows promise as an effective and tolerable treatment for advanced HCC. The reported efficacy of bevacizumab appears to compare favorably with that of sorafenib, the only currently approved treatment for unresectable HCC. Phase III trials are warranted to comprehensively examine the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab for treatment of advanced HCC.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Efficacy and safety of Gemogenovatucel-T (Vigil) immunotherapy for advanced ovarian carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Zhang, Yixin
    Zhang, Li
    Zhao, Yuli
    Wang, Sen
    Feng, Li
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12
  • [32] Efficacy and safety of chemotherapy regimens for first-line treatment of advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in Asia: a systematic review
    Xu, Jianming
    Bai, Yuxian
    Li, Enxiao
    Xu, Nong
    Shi, Danfeng
    Qian, Jing
    EXPERT REVIEW OF ANTICANCER THERAPY, 2022, 22 (09) : 981 - 998
  • [33] Trials of bevacizumab in breast cancer - a safety review
    Kumler, Iben
    Nielsen, Dorte Lisbet
    EXPERT OPINION ON DRUG SAFETY, 2012, 11 : S37 - S48
  • [34] Efficacy and safety of veliparib plus chemotherapy for the treatment of lung cancer: A systematic review of clinical trials
    Daei Sorkhabi, Amin
    Fazlollahi, Asra
    Sarkesh, Aila
    Aletaha, Reza
    Feizi, Hamidreza
    Mousavi, Seyed Ehsan
    Nejadghaderi, Seyed Aria
    Sullman, Mark J. M.
    Kolahi, Ali-Asghar
    Safiri, Saeid
    PLOS ONE, 2023, 18 (09):
  • [35] Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review
    Lin, Shibo
    Hoffmann, Katrin
    Schemmer, Peter
    LIVER CANCER, 2012, 1 (3-4) : 144 - 158
  • [36] Comparison of the safety and efficacy of hepatic resection and radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of single small hepatocellular carcinoma: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wang, Ke
    Wang, Rui
    Liu, Siqin
    Peng, Guoqing
    Yu, Huan
    Wang, Xiaomei
    TRANSLATIONAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2022, 11 (03) : 580 - 590
  • [37] Efficacy and safety of bevacizumab plus erlotinib versus bevacizumab or erlotinib alone in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhang, Shu
    Mao, Xiao-dong
    Wang, Hai-tao
    Cai, Feng
    Xu, Jing
    BMJ OPEN, 2016, 6 (06):
  • [38] Efficacy, Safety, and Survival Factors for Sorafenib Treatment in Japanese Patients with Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma
    Nakano, Masahito
    Tanaka, Masatoshi
    Kuromatsu, Ryoko
    Nagamatsu, Hiroaki
    Sakata, Kenji
    Matsugaki, Satoru
    Kajiwara, Masahiko
    Fukuizumi, Kunitaka
    Tajiri, Nobuyoshi
    Matsukuma, Norito
    Sakai, Terufumi
    Ono, Noriyuki
    Yano, Yoichi
    Koga, Hironori
    Kurogi, Junichi
    Takata, Akio
    Sumie, Shuji
    Satani, Manabu
    Yamada, Shingo
    Niizeki, Takashi
    Aino, Hajime
    Iwamoto, Hideki
    Torimura, Takuji
    Sata, Michio
    ONCOLOGY, 2013, 84 (02) : 108 - 114
  • [39] Safety and efficacy of partial hepatectomy for huge (≥10 cm) hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review
    Zhou, Yan-Ming
    Li, Bin
    Xu, Dong-Hui
    Yang, Jia-Mei
    MEDICAL SCIENCE MONITOR, 2011, 17 (03): : RA76 - RA83
  • [40] Efficacy and Safety Profile of PD-1 Inhibitors Versus Chemotherapy in the Second-Line Treatment of Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Jin, Zhao
    Zhao, Minghe
    JOURNAL OF IMMUNOTHERAPY, 2023, 46 (07) : 262 - 270