Effects and potential of water-saving irrigation for rice production in China

被引:124
作者
Zhuang, Yanhua [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Liang [1 ]
Li, Sisi [1 ]
Liu, Hongbin [2 ]
Zhai, Limei [2 ]
Zhou, Feng [3 ]
Ye, Yushi [4 ]
Ruan, Shuhe [5 ]
Wen, Weijia [5 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Geodesy & Geophys, Hubei Prov Engn Res Ctr Nonpoint Source Pollut Co, Wuhan 430077, Hubei, Peoples R China
[2] Minist Agr, Key Lab Nonpoint Source Pollut Control, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
[3] Peking Univ, Coll Urban & Environm Sci, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China
[4] Changjiang Water Resources Commiss, Changjiang River Sci Res Inst, Wuhan 430010, Hubei, Peoples R China
[5] Wuhan Univ, Sch Resource & Environm Sci, Wuhan 430079, Hubei, Peoples R China
关键词
Rice paddy; Water-saving irrigation (WSI); Yield increasing; Non-point source (NPS) pollution; Source-sink transformation; Sustainable agriculture; PADDY FIELD; AGRONOMIC PERFORMANCE; NITROGEN; MANAGEMENT; YIELD; REGIME; GROWTH; EMISSIONS; LOSSES; RUNOFF;
D O I
10.1016/j.agwat.2019.03.010
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Water-saving irrigation (WSI) is a promising management practice for sustainable rice production. Shallow-wet irrigation (SWI), controlled irrigation (CI), intermittent irrigation (II), and rain-gathering irrigation (RGI) are four common WSI regimes used in China. Their water saving, pollutant reducing, and yield increasing effects were analysed based on literature survey from multi-site field studies across China. An index system considering the applicability and effect of different WSI regimes was developed to identify their potential distributions across China. The potential overall effect of WSI practices at the country level was then estimated. Results showed that CI had the highest average water saving rate (WSR) of 35.12% and the highest average pollutant reducing rate (PRR) of 54.97%, followed by RGI, SWI, and II; while CI had the lowest average yield increasing rate (YIR) (0.79%), followed by II (5.40%), SWI (8.12%), and RGI (11.80%). Overall, the larger the WSR, the larger higher PRR; but the yield increasing effect will be diminished when the WSR is increased to a certain extent due to the resulting rice water stress. About 94.19% of the total paddy area in China are suitable for WSI practices and the unsuitable ones are mainly due to soil structure deterioration and low soil fertility. SWI is the most applicable WSI regime, suitable for 90.03% of paddy fields, followed by CI and II (23.33%), and RGI (4.16%). By full implementation of appropriate WSI regimes at the country level, the total WSR, PRR, and YIR are likely to reach 22.06-26.41%, 32.11-39.11%, and 5.39-6.87%, respectively. The application of WSI practices in China has noticeable potential to alleviate water shortage and non-point source pollution while ensuring high yield.
引用
收藏
页码:374 / 382
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Has water-saving irrigation recovered groundwater in the Hebei Province plains of China? [J].
Zhang, Hongbo ;
Singh, Vijay P. ;
Sun, Dongyong ;
Yu, Qijun ;
Cao, Wei .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT, 2017, 33 (04) :534-552
[42]   AGRICULTURAL WATER-SAVING POTENTIAL FOR GUANZHONG IRRIGATION AREAS UNDER DIFFERENT GUARANTEED RATES OF PRECIPITATION [J].
Yin, J. ;
Fu, Q. ;
Xing, Z. X. ;
Lu, Y. ;
Ou, Z. F. .
APPLIED ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2017, 15 (04) :1255-1274
[43]   Morpho-physiological adaptations of rice leaf to Water deficit under non-flooded water-saving irrigation [J].
Xu, Junzeng ;
Peng, Shizhang ;
Yang, Shihong ;
Yu, Yanmei ;
Wei, Qi .
RESEARCH ON CROPS, 2013, 14 (03) :637-648
[44]   EFFECTS OF WATER-SAVING IRRIGATION COMBINED WITH CONDITIONER ON YIELD, NUTRIENT ABSORPTION AND QUALITY OF DRY DIRECT SEEDING RICE [J].
Lu, Shuchang ;
LI, Xiawen .
INMATEH-AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING, 2023, 69 (01) :437-448
[45]   Assessment of Blue Water Migration and Efficiency in Water-Saving Irrigation Paddy Rice Fields Using the Water Flow Tracking Method [J].
Wu, Mengyang ;
Cui, Simeng ;
Qiu, Liting ;
Zhang, Pingping ;
Cao, Xinchun .
AGRONOMY-BASEL, 2024, 14 (01)
[46]   Effect of water-saving irrigation on CH4 emissions from rice fields [J].
Li, Daoxi .
ADVANCES IN CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, PTS 1-3, 2012, 396-398 :1950-1958
[47]   Optimizing water-saving irrigation schemes for rice (Oryza sativa L.) using DSSAT-CERES-Rice model [J].
Gao, Shikai ;
Gu, Qiongqiong ;
Gong, Xuewen ;
Li, Yanbin ;
Yan, Shaofeng ;
Li, Yuanyuan .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND BIOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2023, 16 (02) :142-151
[48]   Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Global Warming Potential in Double-Cropping Rice Fields as Influenced by Two Water-Saving Irrigation Modes in South China [J].
Li, Luobu ;
Li, Fusheng ;
Dong, Yanfang .
JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE AND PLANT NUTRITION, 2020, 20 (04) :2617-2630
[49]   Evaluation of Growth, Yield, and Water Productivity of Paddy Rice with Water-Saving Irrigation and Optimization of Nitrogen Fertilization [J].
Mboyerwa, Primitiva Andrea ;
Kibret, Kibebew ;
Mtakwa, Peter W. ;
Aschalew, Abebe .
AGRONOMY-BASEL, 2021, 11 (08)
[50]   Biochar Application Combined with Water-Saving Irrigation Enhances Rice Root Growth and Nitrogen Utilization in Paddy Fields [J].
Zhang, Zuohe ;
Zhang, Zhongxue ;
Gong, Zhenping ;
Li, Tiecheng ;
Nie, Tangzhe ;
Chen, Peng ;
Han, Yu ;
Xue, Li .
AGRONOMY-BASEL, 2024, 14 (05)