Effects and potential of water-saving irrigation for rice production in China

被引:120
作者
Zhuang, Yanhua [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Liang [1 ]
Li, Sisi [1 ]
Liu, Hongbin [2 ]
Zhai, Limei [2 ]
Zhou, Feng [3 ]
Ye, Yushi [4 ]
Ruan, Shuhe [5 ]
Wen, Weijia [5 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Geodesy & Geophys, Hubei Prov Engn Res Ctr Nonpoint Source Pollut Co, Wuhan 430077, Hubei, Peoples R China
[2] Minist Agr, Key Lab Nonpoint Source Pollut Control, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
[3] Peking Univ, Coll Urban & Environm Sci, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China
[4] Changjiang Water Resources Commiss, Changjiang River Sci Res Inst, Wuhan 430010, Hubei, Peoples R China
[5] Wuhan Univ, Sch Resource & Environm Sci, Wuhan 430079, Hubei, Peoples R China
关键词
Rice paddy; Water-saving irrigation (WSI); Yield increasing; Non-point source (NPS) pollution; Source-sink transformation; Sustainable agriculture; PADDY FIELD; AGRONOMIC PERFORMANCE; NITROGEN; MANAGEMENT; YIELD; REGIME; GROWTH; EMISSIONS; LOSSES; RUNOFF;
D O I
10.1016/j.agwat.2019.03.010
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Water-saving irrigation (WSI) is a promising management practice for sustainable rice production. Shallow-wet irrigation (SWI), controlled irrigation (CI), intermittent irrigation (II), and rain-gathering irrigation (RGI) are four common WSI regimes used in China. Their water saving, pollutant reducing, and yield increasing effects were analysed based on literature survey from multi-site field studies across China. An index system considering the applicability and effect of different WSI regimes was developed to identify their potential distributions across China. The potential overall effect of WSI practices at the country level was then estimated. Results showed that CI had the highest average water saving rate (WSR) of 35.12% and the highest average pollutant reducing rate (PRR) of 54.97%, followed by RGI, SWI, and II; while CI had the lowest average yield increasing rate (YIR) (0.79%), followed by II (5.40%), SWI (8.12%), and RGI (11.80%). Overall, the larger the WSR, the larger higher PRR; but the yield increasing effect will be diminished when the WSR is increased to a certain extent due to the resulting rice water stress. About 94.19% of the total paddy area in China are suitable for WSI practices and the unsuitable ones are mainly due to soil structure deterioration and low soil fertility. SWI is the most applicable WSI regime, suitable for 90.03% of paddy fields, followed by CI and II (23.33%), and RGI (4.16%). By full implementation of appropriate WSI regimes at the country level, the total WSR, PRR, and YIR are likely to reach 22.06-26.41%, 32.11-39.11%, and 5.39-6.87%, respectively. The application of WSI practices in China has noticeable potential to alleviate water shortage and non-point source pollution while ensuring high yield.
引用
收藏
页码:374 / 382
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   The Economic Value of Gas Exchange in a Paddy Field Ecosystem Using Water-Saving Irrigation [J].
Yang Shihong ;
Xiao Yanan ;
Xu Junzeng .
POLISH JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES, 2018, 27 (05) :2267-2275
[22]   Economic Evaluation of Water-Saving Irrigation Practices for Sustainable Sugarcane Production in Guangxi Province, China [J].
He, Shan-Shan ;
Zeng, Yuan ;
Liang, Zhao-Xu ;
Jing, Yan ;
Tang, ShiYun ;
Zhang, Baoqing ;
Yan, Haifeng ;
Li, Song ;
Xie, Tinglin ;
Tan, Fang ;
Li, Ming .
SUGAR TECH, 2021, 23 (06) :1325-1331
[23]   Precision irrigation perspectives on the sustainable water-saving of field crop production in China: Water demand prediction and irrigation scheme optimization [J].
Peng, Yaoqi ;
Xiao, Yingxin ;
Fu, Zetian ;
Dong, Yuhong ;
Zheng, Yongjun ;
Yan, Haijun ;
Li, Xinxing .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 230 :365-377
[24]   Mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions and reduced irrigation water use in rice production through water-saving irrigation scheduling, reduced tillage and fertiliser application strategies [J].
Faiz-ul Islam, Syed ;
Sander, Bjoern Ole ;
Quilty, James R. ;
de Neergaard, Andreas ;
van Groenigen, Jan Willem ;
Jensen, Lars Stoumann .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 739
[25]   Growth and physiology of basmati rice under conventional and water-saving production systems [J].
Jabran, Khawar ;
Ullah, Ehsan ;
Akbar, Nadeem ;
Yasin, Muhammad ;
Zaman, Umar ;
Nasim, Wajid ;
Riaz, Muhammad ;
Arjumend, Tuba ;
Azhar, Muhammad Farooq ;
Hussain, Mubshar .
ARCHIVES OF AGRONOMY AND SOIL SCIENCE, 2017, 63 (10) :1465-1476
[26]   Economic assessment of different mulches in conventional and water-saving rice production systems [J].
Jabran, Khawar ;
Hussain, Mubshar ;
Fahad, Shah ;
Farooq, Muhammad ;
Bajwa, Ali Ahsan ;
Alharrby, Hesham ;
Nasim, Wajid .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2016, 23 (09) :9156-9163
[27]   Water-saving irrigation practices in rice paddies reverse the impact of root aerenchyma on methane emissions [J].
Li, Siyu ;
Zhang, Yajun ;
Zhao, Jiamei ;
van Groenigen, Kees Jan ;
Shen, Xinya ;
Zhang, Hao ;
Gu, Junfei ;
Zhang, Weiyang ;
Hui, Dafeng ;
Chen, Yun ;
Liu, Lijun .
AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2025, 378
[28]   Deficit Irrigation and Arbuscular Mycorrhiza as a Water-Saving Strategy for Eggplant Production [J].
Badr, M. A. ;
El-Tohamy, W. A. ;
Abou-Hussein, S. D. ;
Gruda, N. S. .
HORTICULTURAE, 2020, 6 (03) :1-17
[29]   Effect of Biochar Amendment on Methane Emissions from Paddy Field under Water-Saving Irrigation [J].
Xiao, Yanan ;
Yang, Shihong ;
Xu, Junzeng ;
Ding, Jie ;
Sun, Xiao ;
Jiang, Zewei .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (05)
[30]   Do water-saving ground cover rice production systems increase grain yields at regional scales? [J].
Liu, Meiju ;
Lin, Shan ;
Dannenmann, Michael ;
Tao, Yueyue ;
Saiz, Gustavo ;
Zuo, Qiang ;
Sippel, Sebastian ;
Wei, Jianjun ;
Cao, Jun ;
Cai, Xianzhong ;
Butterbach-Bahl, Klaus .
FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 2013, 150 :19-28