Validation of acute kidney injury according to the modified KDIGO criteria in infants after cardiac surgery for congenital heart disease

Aim We aimed to validate the incidence of, risk factors for, and postoperative outcomes of acute kidney injury (AKI) according to the modified Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (m-KDIGO) criteria and compare this criteria with both the paediatric Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss, End-stage disease (pRIFLE) and Acute Kidney Injury Network (AKIN) criteria in infants after cardiac surgery. Methods We retrospectively enrolled 145 consecutive infants who underwent open-heart surgery at Kagoshima University Hospital. Results Acute kidney injury was present in 55 (37.9%), 111 (75.9%), and 95 (65.5%) patients according to the m-KDIGO, pRIFLE, and AKIN criteria, respectively. Among these, 71.9% of patients pRIFLE Risk patients and 60.5% of AKIN 1 patients were categorized in the 'no-AKI' group according to the m-KDIGO criteria. Low body weight (m-KDIGO odds ratio [OR], 0.73; P = 0.015; pRIFLE OR, 0.66; P = 0.001; AKIN OR 0.69, P = 0.002) and prolonged cross-clamp time (m-KDIGO OR, 1.02; <P = 0.001; pRIFLE OR, 1.02; P = 0.003; AKIN OR, 1.02; P = 0.001) were independent risk factors for the development of AKI. Further, m-KDIGO-based AKI grade was more strongly associated with higher incidence of requiring renal replacement therapy and mortality than both the pRIFLE- and AKIN- based AKI grade. Conclusion Application of the three criteria resulted in different AKI incidences, but each criterion could be useful for detecting risk factors for AKI. Notably, using m-KDIGO criteria provides more important subsequent postoperative outcomes. The m-KDIGO AKI criteria describe clinically relevant AKI in infants after cardiac surgery.