This analysis provides a historical context for the debate about "true" and "false" childhood sexual abuse memories: discusses selected literature about conventional understandings of memory and their relevance to this debate: presents an integrative, phenomenological approach to memory in the recovery and rehabilitation of women child sexual abuse survivors: and uses the insights gained to draw conclusions about the authenticity of delayed childhood sexual abuse memories. Edward Casey's phenomenological concepts of reminding, reminiscing, recognition, body memory, place memory, and commemoration are used to illuminate the complexity of traumatic memories and recovery and rehabilitation needs of the survivors of childhood sexual abuse.