Ecological restoration modifies the value of biodiversity indicators in resident boreal forest birds

被引:14
作者
Versluijs, Martijn [1 ]
Hjalten, Joakim [1 ]
Roberge, Jean-Michel [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Swedish Univ Agr Sci SLU, Dept Wildlife Fish & Environm Studies, SE-90183 Umea, Sweden
[2] Swedish Forest Agcy, Box 284, SE-90106 Umea, Sweden
关键词
Biodiversity indicators; Ecological restoration; Resident birds; Middle/northern boreal forest; UMBRELLA-SPECIES CONCEPT; BIOTIC INTERACTIONS; HABITAT ASSOCIATIONS; 3-TOED WOODPECKERS; TOP PREDATORS; CONSERVATION; NESTEDNESS; COMPLEXITY; VEGETATION; DIVERSITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.10.020
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
A wide range of different biodiversity indicators have been identified in different biomes and types of environments. However, we currently lack a clear understanding under which circumstances proposed biodiversity indicators are valid indicators and when they are not. Here we conducted a large-scale restoration experiment by emulating natural disturbances through prescribed burning and gap-cutting. From this experiment data of resident forest birds was used to, (1) identify biodiversity indicators in the middle and northern boreal zone, (2) test the effect of forest restoration practices on biodiversity indicators and (3) explore the patterns when biodiversity indicator analyses are performed across a wider range of forest types including both restored and unrestored sites. Additionally, to understand the occurrence of species we correlated their occurrence with local habitat structures across different forest types. We found that both the three-toed woodpecker (Picoides tri-dactylus) and Siberian jay (Perisoreus infaustus) were important biodiversity indicators for the middle/northern boreal zone. The occurrence of these species can generally be used to identify species rich areas across different forest types. However, the three-toed woodpecker, the best indicator for unrestored forest, lost its indicator value after prescribed burning; in these stands the goldcrest (Regulus regulus) was the best biodiversity indicator. Based on habitat associations, we suggest that biodiversity indicators in boreal forest not only indicate high species richness but also structural habitat complexity. Our results draw attention to the fact that one must be careful about using previously identified biodiversity indicators in ecosystems subjected to ecological restoration.
引用
收藏
页码:104 / 111
页数:8
相关论文
共 78 条
  • [1] Ahti T., 1968, Annales Botanici Fennici, V5, P168
  • [2] A consistent metric for nestedness analysis in ecological systems: reconciling concept and measurement
    Almeida-Neto, Mario
    Guimaraes, Paulo
    Guimaraes, Paulo R., Jr.
    Loyola, Rafael D.
    Ulrich, Werner
    [J]. OIKOS, 2008, 117 (08) : 1227 - 1239
  • [3] Andersen J., 2017, STRATEGIES, P1
  • [4] Angelstam P., 2004, Ecological Bulletins, V51, P427
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2016, PACKAGE VEGAN
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2017, R LANG ENV STAT COMP
  • [7] The importance of biotic interactions for modelling species distributions under climate change
    Araujo, Miguel B.
    Luoto, Miska
    [J]. GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND BIOGEOGRAPHY, 2007, 16 (06): : 743 - 753
  • [8] THE MEASURE OF ORDER AND DISORDER IN THE DISTRIBUTION OF SPECIES IN FRAGMENTED HABITAT
    ATMAR, W
    PATTERSON, BD
    [J]. OECOLOGIA, 1993, 96 (03) : 373 - 382
  • [9] Forest restoration to attract a putative umbrella species, the white-backed woodpecker, benefited saproxylic beetles
    Bell, David
    Hjalten, Joakim
    Nilsson, Christer
    Jorgensen, Dolly
    Johansson, Therese
    [J]. ECOSPHERE, 2015, 6 (12):
  • [10] Farmland biodiversity: is habitat heterogeneity the key?
    Benton, TG
    Vickery, JA
    Wilson, JD
    [J]. TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2003, 18 (04) : 182 - 188