Laparoendoscopic single-site varicocelectomy compared with conventional laparoscopic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:5
作者
Wu, Tao [1 ]
Duan, Xi [2 ]
Yang, Xuesong [1 ]
Deng, Xianzhong [1 ]
Cui, Shu [1 ]
机构
[1] North Sichuan Med Coll, Dept Urol, Affiliated Hosp, Nanchong 637000, Peoples R China
[2] North Sichuan Med Coll, Affiliated Hosp, Dept Dermatovenereol, Nanchong 637000, Peoples R China
来源
SPRINGERPLUS | 2016年 / 5卷
关键词
Varicocelectomy; Laparoscopic; Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery; Meta-analysis; MICROSCOPIC VARICOCELECTOMY; MALE-INFERTILITY; LIGATION; MEN; NEPHRECTOMY; UROLOGY; LESS;
D O I
10.1186/s40064-016-3178-1
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Purpose: To present a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing laparoendoscopics single-site varicocelectomy (LESS-V) versus conventional laparoscopic surgery (CTL-V). Methods: A literature search was performed using The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Science Citation Index Expanded and Google Scholar. Literature reviewed included meta-analyses, and randomized and nonrandomized prospective studies. We utilized weight mean difference (WMD) to measure hospital stay, time to return normal activity, postoperative pain and improvement of semen parameters and odds ratio (OR) to postoperative complications and cosmetic satisfaction. We used the Cochrane Collaboration's Review Manager 5.1 software for statistical analysis. Results: We identified six publications which strictly met our eligibility criteria. Meta-analysis of extractable data showed that LESS-V was better than CTL-V in postoperative pain (WMD: -0.46; 95 % CI -0.75 to -0.17; p = 0.002), time to convalescence (WMD: -1.4 days; 95 % CI -2.55 to -0.25; p = 0.02) and cosmetic satisfaction (OR 6.86; 95 % CI 2.89-16.28; p < 0.00001). However, CTL-V was better than LESS-V in operative time (WMD 1.96 min, 95 % CI 0.96-2.96; p = 0.0001). There were no differences between LESS-V and CTL-V in hospital stay (WMD: -0.02 days, 95 % CI -0.39 to 0.35; p = 0.92) and postoperative complications (OR 1.13, 95 % CI 0.57-2.21; p = 0.73). Conclusions: This meta-analysis comparing the efficacy of LESS-V and CTL-V showed that LESS-V was safe, with significantly reduced postoperative pain, shorter recovery time, and better cosmetic outcome.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] Comparison of outcomes of different varicocelectomy techniques: Open inguinal, laparoscopic, and subinguinal microscopic varicocelectomy: A randomized clinical trial
    Al-Kandari, Ahmed M.
    Shabaan, Hani
    Ibrahim, Hamdi M.
    Elshebiny, Yehya H.
    Shokeir, Ahmed A.
    [J]. UROLOGY, 2007, 69 (03) : 417 - 420
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2017, The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses
  • [3] Laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) vs laparoscopic living-donor nephrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Autorino, Riccardo
    Brandao, Luis Felipe
    Sankari, Bashir
    Zargar, Homayoun
    Laydner, Humberto
    Akca, Oktay
    De Sio, Marco
    Mirone, Vincenzo
    Chueh, Shih-Chieh J.
    Kaouk, Jihad H.
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 115 (02) : 206 - 215
  • [4] Laparoendoscopic Single-site and Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery in Urology: A Critical Analysis of the Literature
    Autorino, Riccardo
    Cadeddu, Jeffrey A.
    Desai, Mihir M.
    Gettman, Matthew
    Gill, Inderbir S.
    Kavoussi, Louis R.
    Lima, Estevao
    Montorsi, Francesco
    Richstone, Lee
    Stolzenburg, Jens U.
    Kaouk, Jihad H.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2011, 59 (01) : 26 - 45
  • [5] Varicocele and Male Factor Infertility Treatment: A New Meta-analysis and Review of the Role of Varicocele Repair
    Baazeem, Abdulaziz
    Belzile, Eric
    Ciampi, Antonio
    Dohle, Gert
    Jarvi, Keith
    Salonia, Andrea
    Weidner, Wolfgang
    Zini, Armand
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2011, 60 (04) : 796 - 808
  • [6] Pediatric Varicocelectomy: A Comparative Study of Conventional Laparoscopic and Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Approaches
    Bansal, Danesh
    Riachy, Edward
    DeFoor, W. Robert, Jr.
    Reddy, Pramod P.
    Minevich, Eugene A.
    Alam, Shumyle
    Noh, Paul H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2014, 28 (05) : 513 - 516
  • [7] Laparoscopic vs open varicocelectomy in children and adolescents: review of the recent literature and meta-analysis
    Borruto, Francesca Astra
    Impellizzeri, Pietro
    Antonuccio, Pietro
    Finocchiaro, Alessandra
    Scalfari, Gianfranco
    Arena, Francesco
    Esposito, Ciro
    Romeo, Carmelo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY, 2010, 45 (12) : 2464 - 2469
  • [8] Treatment of Palpable Varicocele in Infertile Men: A Meta-analysis to Define the Best Technique
    Cayan, Selahittin
    Shavakhabov, Shavkat
    Kadioglu, Ates
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANDROLOGY, 2009, 30 (01): : 33 - 40
  • [9] INCIDENCE OF VARICOCELE IN NORMAL MEN AND AMONG MEN OF DIFFERENT AGES
    CLARKE, BG
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1966, 198 (10): : 1121 - &
  • [10] Varicocelectomy improves intrauterine insemination success rates in men with varicocele
    Daitch, JA
    Bedaiwy, MA
    Pasqualotto, EB
    Hendin, BN
    Hallak, J
    Falcone, T
    Thomas, AJ
    Nelson, DR
    Agarwal, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2001, 165 (05) : 1510 - 1513