A k-Nearest Neighbor Locally Weighted Regression Method for Short-Term Traffic Flow Forecasting

被引:0
作者
Li, Shuangshuang [1 ]
Shen, Zhen [1 ]
Xiong, Gang [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, State Key Lab Management & Control Complex Syst, Beijing Engn Res Ctr Intelligent Syst & Technol, Inst Automat, Beijing 100190, Peoples R China
来源
2012 15TH INTERNATIONAL IEEE CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS (ITSC) | 2012年
关键词
PREDICTION; MODELS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
In this paper, a k-nearest neighbor locally weighted regression method (k-LWR) is proposed to forecast the short-term traffic flow. Inspired by k-nearest neighbor (k-NN) method, the traffic flows which have the same clock time with the current traffic flow are viewed as neighbors. The traffic flows which have the same clock time with the predicted traffic flow are viewed as the outputs of the neighbors. The neighbors most similar to the current traffic flow are viewed as nearest neighbors. It is observed that each nearest neighbor has different similarity with the current traffic flow, and the similarity is relevant to the contribution of the nearest neighbor's output to predicted traffic flow. The greater the similarity is, the greater the contribution is. These contributions of the nearest neighbors' outputs are obtained by the locally weighted regression (LWR) method. In this way, k-LWR uses less data, but uses it more effectively. We use the root mean square error (RMSE) between the actual traffic flow and the predicted traffic flow as the measurement. The proposed method is tested on the actual data from Xingye intersection and Feihu intersection in Jiangsu Province in China. The experimental results show that k-LWR has 20% and 24% improvement over the pattern recognition algorithm (PRA), 26% and 30% improvement over k-NN, for the two intersections, respectively.
引用
收藏
页码:1596 / 1601
页数:6
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
Atkeson CG, 1997, ARTIF INTELL REV, V11, P11, DOI 10.1023/A:1006559212014
[2]  
Davis G.A., 1990, Transportation Research Record, P29
[3]  
Fenghua Zhu, 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Service Operations and Logistics and Informatics (SOLI), P347, DOI 10.1109/SOLI.2011.5986583
[4]   The limitations of artificial neural networks for traffic prediction [J].
Hall, J ;
Mars, P .
THIRD IEEE SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTERS AND COMMUNICATIONS, PROCEEDINGS, 1998, :8-12
[5]  
Kim T, 2005, 2005 IEEE INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS CONFERENCE (ITSC), P965
[6]  
Moorthy C. K., 1988, TRANSPORT PLAN TECHN, V12, P45, DOI [DOI 10.1080/03081068808717359, 10.1080/03081068808717359]
[7]   DYNAMIC PREDICTION OF TRAFFIC VOLUME THROUGH KALMAN FILTERING THEORY [J].
OKUTANI, I ;
STEPHANEDES, YJ .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART B-METHODOLOGICAL, 1984, 18 (01) :1-11
[8]  
SHEN Z, 2011, 14 INT IEEE C INT TR, P145
[9]  
Shuangshuang Li, 2012, 2012 9th IEEE International Conference on Networking, Sensing and Control (ICNSC), P1, DOI 10.1109/ICNSC.2012.6204881
[10]   Comparison of parametric and nonparametric models for traffic flow forecasting [J].
Smith, BL ;
Williams, BM ;
Oswald, RK .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART C-EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES, 2002, 10 (04) :303-321