When to Run and When to Hide: The Influence of Concealment, Visibility, and Proximity to Refugia on Perceptions of Risk

被引:77
作者
Camp, Meghan J. [1 ]
Rachlow, Janet L. [1 ]
Woods, Bonnie A. [1 ]
Johnson, Timothy R. [2 ]
Shipley, Lisa A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Idaho, Dept Fish & Wildlife Sci, Moscow, ID 83844 USA
[2] Univ Idaho, Dept Stat, Moscow, ID 83844 USA
[3] Washington State Univ, Sch Environm, Pullman, WA 99164 USA
关键词
FLIGHT INITIATION DISTANCE; RABBITS BRACHYLAGUS-IDAHOENSIS; PREDATION RISK; ESCAPE DECISIONS; HABITAT SELECTION; TIME ALLOCATION; BEHAVIOR; VIGILANCE; CRYPSIS; COVER;
D O I
10.1111/eth.12000
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
An animal's ability to avoid predation likely depends on its ability to detect approaching predators, conceal itself, and seek refuge or protection from predators. Habitat, especially vegetation structure, can influence all of these factors concurrently. Binary categorical assessments of habitat as open or closed, however, confound at least two functions of habitat structure that could influence the perceived risk of predation: concealment, which functions to hide an individual, and visibility, which enhances detection of a potential predator. Both can influence predation risk independently and simultaneously. In this study, we decoupled these functional properties of vegetation and studied the effects of concealment, visibility, and proximity to a refuge on the distance at which pygmy rabbits (Brachylagus idahoensis) fled from an approaching threat (flight initiation distance; FID). Concealment by vegetation decreased perceptions of risk; however, pygmy rabbits exhibited elevated risk at high levels of visibility, regardless of the amount of concealment. Proximity to burrow entrances also influenced perceptions of risk, such that risk was significantly lower when rabbits were on or near burrow systems. Disentangling the functional properties of habitat can provide a more comprehensive understanding of the factors that influence perceived risk and escape behaviors of prey and provide insight into how habitat structure mechanistically relates to predation risk.
引用
收藏
页码:1010 / 1017
页数:8
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]  
Altendorf KB, 2001, J MAMMAL, V82, P430, DOI 10.1644/1545-1542(2001)082<0430:AEOPRO>2.0.CO
[2]  
2
[3]   Experimental manipulation of predation risk and food quality: effect on grazing behaviour in a central-place foraging herbivore [J].
Bakker, ES ;
Reiffers, RC ;
Olff, H ;
Gleichman, JM .
OECOLOGIA, 2005, 146 (01) :157-167
[4]   Who are you looking at? Hadeda ibises use direction of gaze, head orientation and approach speed in their risk assessment of a potential predator [J].
Bateman, P. W. ;
Fleming, P. A. .
JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY, 2011, 285 (04) :316-323
[6]  
Blumstein DT, 1998, ETHOLOGY, V104, P501
[7]   Locomotor ability and wariness in yellow-bellied marmots [J].
Blumstein, DT ;
Runyan, A ;
Seymour, M ;
Nicodemus, A ;
Ozgul, A ;
Ransler, F ;
Im, S ;
Stark, T ;
Zugmeyer, C ;
Daniel, JC .
ETHOLOGY, 2004, 110 (08) :615-634
[8]   The influence of distance to burrow on flight initiation distance in the woodchuck, Marmota monax [J].
Bonenfant, M ;
Kramer, DL .
BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY, 1996, 7 (03) :299-303
[9]   Effect of visibility on time allocation and escape decisions in crimson rosellas [J].
Boyer, Jennifer S. ;
Hassa, Laura L. ;
Lurie, Matthew H. ;
Blumstein, Daniel T. .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY, 2006, 54 (05) :363-367
[10]   INFLUENCE OF SUBSTRATE TEMPERATURE AND DIRECTNESS OF APPROACH ON THE ESCAPE RESPONSES OF JUVENILE COLLARED LIZARDS [J].
Braun, Cody A. ;
Baird, Troy A. ;
LeBeau, Jennifer K. .
HERPETOLOGICA, 2010, 66 (04) :418-424