Disposable masks: Disinfection and sterilization for reuse, and non-certified manufacturing, in the face of shortages during the COVID-19 pandemic

被引:182
作者
Carlos Rubio-Romero, Juan [1 ]
del Carmen Pardo-Ferreira, Maria [1 ]
Antonio Torrecilla-Garcia, Juan [1 ]
Calero-Castro, Santiago [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Malaga, Sch Ind Engn, C Dr Ortiz Ramos S-N Teatinos, Malaga 29071, Spain
基金
英国科研创新办公室;
关键词
PPE; SARS-COV-2; Coronavirus; Filtering facepiece respirators; Decontamination; Reuse; HEALTH-CARE WORKERS; N95; RESPIRATORS; DECONTAMINATION METHODS; SURGICAL MASKS; PERFORMANCE; INFLUENZA;
D O I
10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104830
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The COVID-19 pandemic is posing a huge global health threat. To deal with this problem, in addition to research and work in the medical field, the main health measures being taken in the workplace and at home involve the establishment of safety protocols, which include distance measures, hygiene and the use of personal protective equipment, such as masks, etc. The WHO still does not recommend the use of masks for the general population. However, their successful use in China, South Korea and the Czech Republic has encouraged their widespread use, and the shortage that already existed. This has caused that companies and individuals are looking at the best way to reuse them, and to manufacture, homemade or not, of non-certified masks. This paper is based on two objectives: to consult the scientific literature to identify the main strategies for disinfecting them, and to determine the effectiveness of non-certified disposable masks. A rapid review has been conducted in which the main publications and other information available online have been analyzed. Results showed that the most promising methods are those that use hydrogen peroxide vapor, ultraviolet radiation, moist heat, dry heat and ozone gas. Soapy water, alcohol, bleach immersion, ethylene oxide, ionizing radiation, microwave, high temperature, autoclave or steam are not fully recommended. Regarding the effectiveness of surgical masks compared to PPE, the former have been seen to be slightly less effective than PPE. As for other types of masks the effectiveness of homemade or non-certified masks is very low.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 74 条
[11]  
Bergman MS, 2010, J ENG FIBER FABR, V5, P33
[12]  
Bergman MS., 2011, Journal of the International Society of Respiratory Protection, V28, P48
[13]   Disinfection of reusable elastomeric respirators by health care workers: A feasibility study and development of standard operating procedures [J].
Bessesen, Mary T. ;
Adams, Jill C. ;
Radonovich, Lewis ;
Anderson, Judith .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INFECTION CONTROL, 2015, 43 (06) :629-634
[14]  
Bimedica, 2020, NAT CON FFP3
[15]  
Bimedica, 2020, NAT VERT FFP2
[16]  
Card K. J., 2020, OCCUP ENV HLTH, DOI [10.1101/2020.03.25.20043489, DOI 10.1101/2020.03.25.20043489]
[17]  
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2020, DEC REUS FILT FAC RE
[18]  
Dennis R., 2020, J. Sci. Med., V2, DOI https://doi.org/10.37714/josam.v2i1.35
[19]  
Derraik J. G. B., 2020, RAPID EVIDENCE SUMMA, DOI [10.1101/2020.04.02.20051409, DOI 10.1101/2020.04.02.20051409]
[20]  
Dutch National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, 2020, REUS FFP2 MASKS