Multidisciplinary Design Optimization through process integration in the AEC industry: Strategies and challenges

被引:32
|
作者
Diaz, Hector [1 ]
Alarcon, Luis F. [1 ]
Mourgues, Claudio [1 ]
Garcia, Salvador [2 ]
机构
[1] Pontificia Univ Catolica Chile, Sch Civil Engn, Vicuna Mackenna 4860, Santiago, Chile
[2] Inst Tecnol & Estudios Super Monterrey, Sch Civil Engn, Campus Monterrey,Eugenio Garza Sada 2501 Sur, Monterrey, Mexico
关键词
Building Information Modeling; Process Integration and Design Optimization; Multidisciplinary Design Optimization; Parametric Modeling; Component Interoperability; Architecture-Engineering-Construction; MDO requisites; ZERO-ENERGY BUILDINGS; GENETIC ALGORITHMS; ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN; PERFORMANCE; SYSTEMS; SIMULATION; FRAMEWORK; ENVIRONMENTS; EXPLORATION; FEEDBACK;
D O I
10.1016/j.autcon.2016.09.007
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Recently Multidisciplinary Design Optimization (MDO) has emerged in the Architecture-Engineering-Construction (AEC) industry to assist designers in making the design process more efficient, by achieving more design alternatives in less time. Currently, MDO is developed with software tools that work together and automatically. However, the technical requisites to develop MDO using Process Integration and Design Optimization (PIDO) platforms are not clearly specified in the design optimization literature. There are many difficulties not covered by the literature: especially the tools' behavior, and the strategies to deal with PIDO. To determine the technical requirements, the tools' behavior, the challenges of interoperability and viable strategies, we reviewed the literature and tested five tools. This paper presents the main behavior of the tools we studied, and explains the challenges and strategies to develop MDO through PIDO. We observed three technical tool requisites: component interoperability, tool automation, and model parameterization capabilities. We detected low openness levels of the tool interfaces that did not always enable a full integration with PIDO or permit access to model properties. The scarcity of commands and the presence of pop-up menus impeded performing analyses automatically. Moreover, most of the tools did not allow parametric associations among components, compatibility among themselves or the addition of custom components. The strategies proposed focused on testing the tool interfaces, to validate that each computational process runs automatically, and to confirm that parametric relationships and components are possible: The tools tested were not specifically designed to include full capability to work with PIDO, therefore, enhancements would be needed to meet the three requisites: component interoperability, automation and parameterization. Technological, documentation and programming challenges also emerged when working with tools. We demonstrated that only certain tools can be used with a PIDO platform. However, there may be still other requisites for MDO using different methods that can become the focus of future work. (C) 2016 Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:102 / 119
页数:18
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [21] Model-based multi-parametric programming strategies towards the integration of design, control and operational optimization
    Diangelakis, Nikolaos A.
    Pistikopoulos, Efstratios N.
    27TH EUROPEAN SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTER AIDED PROCESS ENGINEERING, PT B, 2017, 40B : 1867 - 1872
  • [22] Enabling large-scale multidisciplinary design optimization through adjoint sensitivity analysis
    Joaquim R. R. A. Martins
    Graeme J. Kennedy
    Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2021, 64 : 2959 - 2974
  • [23] Role of global buckling in the optimization process of grid shells: Design strategies
    Grande, Ernesto
    Imbimbo, Maura
    Tomei, Valentina
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2018, 156 : 260 - 270
  • [24] Integration of cutting time into the structural optimization process: application to a spreader bar design
    Corbera Caraballo, S.
    Alvarez Fernandez, R.
    Lozano Ruiz, J. A.
    STRUCTURAL AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION, 2018, 58 (05) : 2269 - 2289
  • [25] Integration of cutting time into the structural optimization process: application to a spreader bar design
    S. Corbera Caraballo
    R. Álvarez Fernández
    J. A. Lozano Ruiz
    Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2018, 58 : 2269 - 2289
  • [26] Innovative valorization of biomass waste through integration of pyrolysis and gasification: Process design, optimization, and multi-scenario sustainability analysis
    Ayub, Yousaf
    Zhou, Jianzhao
    Shen, Weifeng
    Ren, Jingzheng
    ENERGY, 2023, 282
  • [27] PROCESS ANALYSIS AND OPTIMIZATION MAPPING THROUGH DESIGN OF EXPERIMENTS AND ITS APPLICATION TO A POLYMERIZATION PROCESS
    Pontes, K. V.
    Wolf Maciel, M. R.
    Maciel, R.
    Embirucu, M.
    BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2011, 28 (01) : 137 - 150
  • [28] Integration of Algorithm-Based Optimization into the Design Process of Industrial Buildings: A Case Study
    Konrad, Mirjam
    Saez, Dana
    Trautz, Martin
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2021 DIGITALFUTURES, CDRF 2021, 2022, : 179 - 188
  • [29] Optimization of olive pomace dehydration process through the integration of computational fluid dynamics and deep learning
    Cabrera-Escobar, Jose
    Vera, David
    Jurado, Francisco
    Cordova-Suarez, Manolo
    Santillan-Valdiviezo, Gonzalo
    Rodriguez-Orta, Antonio
    Cabrera-Escobar, Raul
    ENERGY SOURCES PART A-RECOVERY UTILIZATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS, 2024, 46 (01) : 4756 - 4776
  • [30] Design Optioneering: Multi-disciplinary Design Optimization through Parameterization, Domain Integration and Automation of a Genetic Algorithm
    Gerber, David Jason
    Lin, Shih-Hsin
    Pan, Bei
    Solmaz, Aslihan Senel
    SYMPOSIUM ON SIMULATION FOR ARCHITECTURE AND URBAN DESIGN 2012 (SIMAUD 2012), 2012, 44 (08): : 32 - 39